journal article·2026-04-18Open access

Personalized 3D-Printed Hybrid PDMS and PEEK Implants for Revisional Orbitomaxillary Reconstruction: A Translational Case-Based Technical Note

Goran Marić, Darko Solter, Blanka Doko Mandić, Jelena Škunca Herman, Zoran Vatavuk, Damir Godec, Davor Vagić, Alan Pegan

Abstract

The reconstruction of complex orbitomaxillary defects requires biomaterials that can simultaneously provide structural stability, biocompatibility, and accurate restoration of facial volume and contour. While rigid polymers such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) offer reliable mechanical support, they do not adequately replicate the viscoelastic behavior of soft tissues. This report presents a translational revision case employing a personalized hybrid biomaterial approach that combines a 3D-printed PEEK implant for structural orbital floor support with a patient-specific polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) implant for malar volumetric augmentation. Reconstruction was planned using CT segmentation and contralateral mirroring. Patient-specific implants were subsequently designed using CAD/CAM techniques, combining a rigid PEEK implant for structural orbital support with a flexible PDMS implant for malar volumetric augmentation with complementary mechanical properties. Revision surgery included the removal of inadequately positioned titanium hardware, the release of incarcerated extraocular muscles, and the restoration of orbital anatomy and facial symmetry. Postoperative imaging demonstrated stable implant positioning and sustained orbitomaxillary stability. Despite successful anatomical reconstruction, residual functional sequelae, including strabismus related to the severity of the initial orbital trauma, persisted and were addressed separately in a staged manner, resulting in satisfactory ocular alignment and resolution of diplopia in primary gaze. This case underscores the complementary functional roles of rigid and elastic polymers and highlights the translational potential of PDMS as a permanent, patient-specific implant material for volumetric and contour restoration in craniofacial reconstruction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Ocular Disorders and Treatments · Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Ophthalmology, Univeristy Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska Cesta 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Vinogradska Cesta 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects using patient-specific long-lasting titanium implants10.1038/s41598-022-11200-0 ↗
2. What are the limitations of the non-patient-specific implant in titanium reconstruction of the orbit?10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.06.038 ↗
3. Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Implants and the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database: An Updated Review of Adverse Events and Complications10.1097/SCS.0000000000009871 ↗
4. Reconstruction of complex orbital fracture with titanium implants
5. Kauke-Navarro, M., Knoedler, L., Knoedler, S., Deniz, C., and Safi, A.F. (2024). Surface modification of PEEK implants for craniofacial reconstruction and aesthetic augmentation—Fiction or reality?. Front. Surg., 11.10.3389/fsurg.2024.1351749 ↗
6. Miranda, I., Souza, A., Sousa, P., Ribeiro, J., Castanheira, E.M.S., Lima, R., and Minas, G. (2021). Properties and Applications of PDMS for Biomedical Engineering: A Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13010002 ↗
7. Neves, L.B., Afonso, I.S., Nobrega, G., Barbosa, L.G., Lima, R.A., and Ribeiro, J.E. (2024). A Review of Methods to Modify the PDMS Surface Wettability and Their Applications. Micromachines, 15.10.3390/mi15060670 ↗
8. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.x ↗
9. Virtual Surgical Planning for Orbital Reconstruction10.4103/0974-9233.164626 ↗
10. Virtual Surgical Planning and 3-Dimensional Printing for the Treatment of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex and/or Orbital Fracture10.1097/SCS.0000000000009056 ↗
11. D’Alpaos, D., Badiali, G., Ceccariglia, F., and Tarsitano, A. (2024). Delayed Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using Mirroring Technique and Patient-Specific Implants: Proof of Concept. J. Pers. Med., 14.10.3390/jpm14050459 ↗
12. Computer-assisted orbital and midfacial reconstruction
13. Using 3D Printing and Mirror Image Modeling in Orbital Floor Reconstruction10.1097/SCS.0000000000007672 ↗
14. Virtual Surgical Planning and Three-Dimensional Printed Guide for Soft Tissue Correction in Facial Asymmetry10.1097/SCS.0000000000005204 ↗
15. Balderrama, F., Schafer, S., El Shatanofy, M., Bergamo, E.T.P., Mirsky, N.A., Nayak, V.V., Marcantonio Junior, E., Alifarag, A.M., Coelho, P.G., and Witek, L. (2024). Biomimetic Tissue Engineering Strategies for Craniofacial Applications. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9100636 ↗
16. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 ↗
17. Additive manufactured polyether-ether-ketone implants for orthopaedic applications: A narrative review
18. A Comprehensive Review on Manufacturing and Characterization of Polyetheretherketone Polymers for Dental Implant Applications10.1089/3dp.2023.0064 ↗
19. (2025). Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices — Part 1: Evaluation and Testing Within a Risk Management Process (Standard No. ISO 10993-1:2025).
20. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6 ↗
21. Dardouri, M., Bettencourt, A., Martin, V., Carvalho, F.A., Colaço, B., Gama, A., Ramstedt, M., Santos, N.C., Fernandes, M.H., and Gomes, P.S. (2022). Assuring the Biofunctionalization of Silicone Covalently Bonded to Rhamnolipids: Antibiofilm Activity and Biocompatibility. Pharmaceuticals, 14.10.3390/pharmaceutics14091836 ↗
22. Maldonado, F.C., Fonseca, C.G., Jimenez, C.B., Galaviz, L.A.A., Martinez-Fierro, M.L., Vazquez, L.T., and Ortiz, M.E.R. (2025). In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a New Experimental Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Endodontic Sealer. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16110402 ↗
23. Ariati, R., Sales, F., Souza, A., Lima, R.A., and Ribeiro, J. (2021). Polydimethylsiloxane Composites Characterization and Its Applications: A Review. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13234258 ↗
24. Dendrimer-grafted cell adhesion peptide-modified PDMS10.1002/btpr.5 ↗
25. Malar augmentation: A 5-year retrospective review of the silastic midfacial malar implant10.1001/archotol.125.9.980 ↗
26. Facial Contouring Surgery with Custom Silicone Implants Based on a 3D Prototype Model and CT-Scan: A Preliminary Study10.1007/s00266-015-0482-z ↗
27. Clinical efficacy of PEEK patient-specific implants in orbital reconstruction10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.01.006 ↗
28. Patient specific implants in orbital reconstruction: A pilot study10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101222 ↗
29. Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.011 ↗
30. Engineering graded tissue interfaces10.1073/pnas.0801988105 ↗
31. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
32. A New Classification of Three-Dimensional Printing Technologies: Systematic Review of Three-Dimensional Printing for Patient-Specific Craniomaxillofacial Surgery10.1097/PRS.0000000000003232 ↗
33. Discussion: Effects of Nanofat in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review10.1097/PRS.0000000000011443 ↗
34. Fat Grafting for Treatment of Secondary Facial Deformity10.1016/j.cps.2019.08.011 ↗
35. Reconstruction of Post-Traumatic/Pathologic Defects with Zygomatic and Patient-Specific Implants10.1016/j.cxom.2025.04.009 ↗
36. Marić, G., Godec, D., Krajačić, B., Radmilović, M., and Vatavuk, Z. (2025). The VaMa (Vatavuk and Marić) Artificial Intraocular Lens Capsule: A Novel Device and Method for Reversible Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Aphakia Without Efficient Capsular Support. Biomedicines, 13.10.3390/biomedicines13010162 ↗