journal article·2026-03-18Open access

Mechanostat-Informed Strain Mapping of Osseodensification-Inspired Peri-Implant Densification Versus Conventional Drilling in Osteoporotic-like Low-Density Cancellous Bone: A 3D Static Linear Finite Element Analysis

Mesut Tuzlali, Nagehan Baki, Nazik İrem Önügören, Kübra Aral, Erkan Bahçe, Cüneyt Asım Aral

Abstract

Low-density cancellous bone results in reduced trabecular support and may increase crestal cortical strain around implants. Osseodensification (OD) compacts trabecular bone and may create a peri-osteotomy densified zone, but its strain-level effects in osteoporotic-like bone are unclear. This study evaluated whether an OD-inspired peri-implant densified trabecular zone reduces crestal cortical strain compared with conventional drilling (CD) in an osteoporotic-like model. A three-dimensional finite element model of a mandibular posterior segment with a 2.0-mm cortical shell and D4 cancellous core was constructed with a 4.3 × 11.4-mm titanium implant and a cemented monolithic zirconia crown. CD used a 4.0-mm osteotomy in D4 bone. The OD model used the same osteotomy plus a concentric peri-implant densified shell with radial density gradation from D1 to D3. The implant–bone interface was defined as bonded. Static 100 N axial and 45° oblique loads were applied. Outcomes were εeq, εmax, and εmin, summarized as mean top-10 nodal values. OD reduced crestal cortical strains under both loads. Under axial loading, εeq, εmax, and |εmin| decreased by 17.7%, 19.0%, and 24.1%, respectively. Under oblique loading, the corresponding reductions were 9.8%, 8.0%, and 8.9%. Oblique loading produced higher cortical strains than axial loading in both models. OD-inspired peri-implant densification reduced crestal cortical strain in this osteoporotic-like model, whereas oblique loading remained the main driver of elevated strain. These findings support occlusal/prosthetic strategies that minimize oblique forces and warrant experimental and clinical validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Bone health and osteoporosis research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Türkiye

Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Türkiye

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Inonu University, 44280 Malatya, Türkiye

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Osseointegration: A review of the fundamentals for assuring cementless skeletal fixation
2. Fixation Failure in Osteoporotic Bone: A Review of Complications and Outcomes10.1007/s43465-024-01316-y ↗
3. Advancements in osteoporotic spine fixation10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.028 ↗
4. An overview and management of osteoporosis
5. Shen, Y., Huang, X., Wu, J., Lin, X., Zhou, X., Zhu, Z., Pan, X., Xu, J., Qiao, J., and Zhang, T. (2022). The Global Burden of Osteoporosis, Low Bone Mass, and Its Related Fracture in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019. Front. Endocrinol., 13.10.3389/fendo.2022.882241 ↗
6. Osteoporosis and fragility fractures10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.003 ↗
7. Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.021 ↗
8. Do dental implants placed in patients with osteoporosis have higher risks of failure and marginal bone loss compared to those in healthy patients? A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1007/s00784-023-05005-2 ↗
9. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw–2024 Update10.33425/2639-9490.1142 ↗
10. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients on Antiresorptive Medication With Dental Implants. A Scoping Review10.1111/clr.14453 ↗
11. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update10.1016/j.joms.2022.02.008 ↗
12. Effect of bone quality and quantity on the primary stability of dental implants in a simulated bicortical placement10.1007/s00784-020-03432-z ↗
13. Risk factors associated with early implant failure: A retrospective review10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101749 ↗
14. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact10.11607/jomi.4817 ↗
15. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep10.1097/ID.0000000000000358 ↗
16. Osseodensification effect on implants primary and secondary stability: Multicenter controlled clinical trial10.1111/cid.13007 ↗
17. Mohammadi, M., Mohamadi Moghadam, M., and Arab-Zozani, M. (2025). Primary and secondary stability in implants placed in low-density bone using conventional vs. osseodensification technique: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-07201-w ↗
18. The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Levels: A Randomized Control Clinical Trial10.1002/cre2.70126 ↗
19. Bone’s mechanostat: A 2003 update10.1002/ar.a.10119 ↗
20. Bones’ adaptive response to mechanical loading is essentially linear between the low strains associated with disuse and the high strains associated with the lamellar/woven bone transition10.1002/jbmr.1599 ↗
21. Marques, F.C., Boaretti, D., Walle, M., Scheuren, A.C., Schulte, F.A., and Müller, R. (2023). Mechanostat parameters estimated from time-lapsed in vivo micro-computed tomography data of mechanically driven bone adaptation are logarithmically dependent on loading frequency. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 11.10.3389/fbioe.2023.1140673 ↗
22. Fontes Pereira, J., Costa, R., Nunes Vasques, M., Salazar, F., Mendes, J.M., and Infante da Câmara, M. (2023). Osseodensification: An Alternative to Conventional Osteotomy in Implant Site Preparation: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12227046 ↗
23. Using Finite Element Modeling in Bone Mechanoadaptation10.1007/s11914-023-00776-9 ↗
24. Finite element analysis in the Dental Sciences: A Bibliometric and a Visual Study10.1016/j.identj.2024.08.005 ↗
25. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002 ↗
26. Fixture design effects on posterior dental implant stability using finite element analysis (FEA): A systematic review10.1186/s13005-025-00566-x ↗
27. Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: A three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1007/s13191-012-0189-7 ↗
28. The bending stress distribution in bilayered and graded zirconia-based dental ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.245 ↗
29. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. An experimental study in sheep10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.007 ↗
30. Pisarciuc, C., Dan, I., and Cioară, R. (2023). The Influence of Mesh Density on the Results Obtained by Finite Element Analysis of Complex Bodies. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16072555 ↗
31. Stress and strain distribution in three different mini dental implant designs using in implant retained overdenture: A finite element analysis study
32. A Nonlinear Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution and Microstrain Evaluation in Short Dental Implants with Three Different Implant-Abutment Connections in Single and Splinted Conditions in the Posterior Mandible10.1155/2023/8851098 ↗
33. A 3-D finite element analysis of the effect of dental implant thread angle on stress distribution in the surrounding bone10.34172/joddd.2022.009 ↗
34. Preventing stress singularities in peri-implant bone—A finite element analysis using a graded bone model10.1080/10255842.2023.2190832 ↗
35. İlter Er, Ö., and Çelenk, S. (2025). Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Immature Permanent Incisors Following MTA Apexification with Different Coronal Base Materials. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10110746 ↗
36. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal10.1002/ar.1092190104 ↗
37. Numerical prediction of peri-implant bone adaptation: Comparison of mechanical stimuli and sensitivity to modeling parameters10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.08.008 ↗
38. The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments: A study in sheep10.1002/jbm.b.34154 ↗
39. Baek, Y.-W., Lim, Y.-J., and Kim, B. (2023). Comparison of Implant Surgery Methods of Cortical Tapping and Cortical Widening in Bone of Various Density: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16083261 ↗
40. Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Ren, M., Chen, X., Luo, L., Zheng, L., and Liu, Y. (2023). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9 ↗
41. González-Mederos, P., Rodríguez-Guerra, J., González, J.E., Picardo, A., and Torres, Y. (2025). A Finite Element Analysis of a New Dental Implant Design: The Influence of the Diameter, Length, and Material of an Implant on Its Biomechanical Behavior. Materials, 18.10.3390/ma18122692 ↗
42. Influence of dental implant designs on the strain at the peri-implant cortical bone: A finite element study10.1080/10255842.2020.1813424 ↗
43. The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: A systematic review10.1038/s41598-021-90142-5 ↗
44. Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations10.1155/2013/265412 ↗
45. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: A literature review10.1055/s-0039-1697833 ↗
46. Linear viscoelasticity-bone volume fraction relationships of bovine trabecular bone10.1007/s10237-016-0787-0 ↗
47. Bone volume fraction and fabric anisotropy are better determinants of trabecular bone stiffness than other morphological variables10.1002/jbmr.2437 ↗
48. Reporting guidelines for in-silico studies using finite element analysis in medicine (RIFEM)10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106675 ↗