The Effect of Biomechanical Loading Parameters on the Stress and Strain Behavior of Orthodontic Mini-Implants: A Finite Element Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of key biomechanical parameters—orthodontic force magnitude, loading direction, and insertion depth—on stress and strain distribution in orthodontic mini-implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEM). Methods: A three-dimensional model of a titanium orthodontic mini-implant inserted into a mandibular bone segment was developed and analyzed under varying force magnitudes (1–10 N), loading directions (30°, 45°, and 60°), and insertion depths (2–4 mm). Cortical and cancellous bone components were included, and static loading conditions were applied using simplified, linear elastic material assumptions. Results: Stress and strain levels increased with higher force magnitudes, with implant stresses approaching critical values at loads above 9 N. Cortical bone stresses remained within physiological limits, whereas cancellous bone exceeded the microdamage strain threshold at forces greater than 3 N. A 60° loading direction reduced implant bending and strain, while deeper insertion significantly decreased strain and displacement, indicating improved primary stability. Conclusions: Within the limits of this computational model, optimal mechanical behavior was observed under 1–3 N forces, a 60° loading direction, and a 2–4 mm insertion depth. Loads above 9 N approached fatigue and interfacial risk. These findings provide computational insight into the biomechanical behavior of orthodontic mini-implants under the modeled conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi, 700259 Iași, Romania
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure of palatal and buccal mini-implants10.2319/090720-777.1 ↗
2. Factorial analysis of variables affecting bone stress adjacent to mini-implants used for molar distalization by direct anchorage—A finite element study10.4103/jos.jos_77_22 ↗
3. Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01149.x ↗
4. Sequential bone response to immediately loaded mini-implants, in vivo study
5. Evaluation of stability of three different mini-implants based on thread shape factor and numerical analysis of stress around mini-implants with different insertion angles under en-masse retraction force10.1590/2177-6709.25.6.059-068.oar ↗
6. Comparison of mini-implants placed at different heights and angulations for retraction and intrusion of maxillary incisors: A finite element model study10.1177/03015742241265790 ↗
7. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion—A three-dimensional finite element study10.1186/s40510-016-0117-1 ↗
8. Choi, J., Kim, M., Kim, S., Chung, K., and Nelson, G. (2021). Effect of different head hole positions on the rotational resistance and stability of orthodontic miniscrews: A three-dimensional finite element study. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21113798 ↗
9. Buccal cortical bone thickness in Iraqi Arab adults by cone beam computed tomography for orthodontic mini-implants10.12816/0038674 ↗
10. An evaluation of insertion sites for mini-implants10.2319/042512-344.1 ↗
11. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01465.x ↗
12. Effect of different angulation of forces on mini implant and abutment at various levels10.18231/j.jdp.2022.008 ↗
13. Effect Of changing various parameters on stress distribution in mini-screws and surrounding alveolar bone: A three dimensional finite element analysis10.21608/eos.2019.76617 ↗
14. Use of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Conjunction with Elastics for Extrusion of Impacted Canines and Correction of Bimaxillary Protrusion10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_581_24 ↗
15. Anchorage and Stability of Orthodontic Mini Implants in Relation to Length and Types of Implants
16. Assessment of the stresses produced on the bone implant/tissue interface to the different insertion angulations of the implant—A three-dimensional analysis by the finite elements method10.4317/jced.57387 ↗
17. Implant insertion angle and depth: Peri-implant bone stress analysis by the finite element method
18. Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: An in vitro experiment and finite element analysis10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.251 ↗
19. Dynamic plastic response of beams subjected to localised pulse loads10.1177/2041419618807721 ↗
20. Comparative evaluation of displacement and stress distribution pattern during mandibular arch distalization with extra and inter-radicular mini-implants: A three-dimensional finite element study10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321373.oar ↗
21. Stress influence on orthodontic system components under simulated treatment loadings10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105569 ↗
22. Geometrical design characteristics of orthodontic mini-implants predicting maximum insertion torque10.4041/kjod.2014.44.4.177 ↗
23. Mechanical anisotropy of orthodontic mini-implants10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.009 ↗
24. Bone stress for a mini-implant close to the roots of adjacent teeth—3D finite element analysis10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.011 ↗
25. Lu, Y., Chang, S.-H., Ye, J., Shan, Y., and Yu, Y. (2015). Finite element analysis of bone stress around micro-implants of different diameters and lengths with application of a single or composite torque force. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0144744 ↗
26. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the bone mini-implant interface based on the mini-implant angle of insertion, diameter, and length10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_524_22 ↗
27. Stress distribution around single short dental implants: A Finite Element Study10.1007/s13191-014-0390-y ↗
28. A comparative study of mechanical properties and machinability of wrought and additive manufactured (selective laser melting) titanium alloy—Ti-6Al-4V10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0105 ↗
29. High strength porous Ti–6Al–4V foams synthesized by solid state powder processing10.1088/0022-3727/41/10/105404 ↗
30. Lv, Z., Li, H., Che, L., Chen, S., Zhang, P., He, J., Wu, Z., Niu, S., and Li, X. (2023). Effects of HIP Process Parameters on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Fabricated by SLM. Metals, 13.10.3390/met13050991 ↗
31. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stability of mini-implants close to the roots of adjacent teeth upon application of bite force10.4012/dmj.2017-359 ↗
32. Evaluation of stress distribution in implant body and surrounding bone with and without splinting—A three-dimensional finite element analysis: An in vitro study10.1055/s-0042-1749464 ↗
33. Stress distribution on short implants at maxillary posterior alveolar bone model with different bone-to-implant contact ratios: Finite element analysis
34. Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with and without Microthreads under Static and Dynamic Loading10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2017020007 ↗
35. Biomechanical analysis of a radial functionally graded dental implant–bone system under multi-directional dynamic loads10.1007/s40430-018-1166-9 ↗
36. Linearly dependent vectorial decomposition of clutters10.1016/j.endm.2014.08.028 ↗
37. Completion and decomposition of a clutter into representable matroids10.1016/j.laa.2015.01.023 ↗
38. Lin, D., Wen, S., Ye, Z., Yi, Y., Yuan, X., Lai, W., and Long, H. (2024). Evaluation of optimal insertion sites and angles for orthodontic mini-implants at the anterior nasal spine region based on cone-beam computed tomography. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13030837 ↗
39. Popa, A., Dehelean, C., Călniceanu, H., Watz, C., Brad, S., Sinescu, C., and Szuhanek, C. (2020). A custom-made orthodontic mini-implant—Effect of insertion angle and cortical bone thickness on stress distribution with a complex in vitro and in vivo biosafety profile. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13214789 ↗
40. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants10.2319/100707-484.1 ↗
41. Evaluation of strain and insertion torque of mini-implants at 90° and 45° angulations on a bone model using three-dimensional finite element analysis10.4103/ccd.ccd_725_21 ↗
42. Finite element analysis of stress and displacement around mini-implants using different insertion angles and various directions of orthodontic force in maxilla and mandible10.4103/0301-5742.162235 ↗
43. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.037 ↗
44. Temporary anchorage device insertion variables: Effects on retention10.2319/070309-376.1 ↗
45. Risk factors for failure of orthodontic mini-screws placed in the median palate10.2334/josnusd.17-0377 ↗
46. Influence of insertion depth on stress distribution in orthodontic miniscrew and the surrounding bone by finite element analysis10.4012/dmj.2020-400 ↗
47. Stability of paramedian inserted palatal mini-implants at the initial healing period: A controlled clinical study10.1111/clr.12321 ↗
48. Effects of Rigid and Nonrigid Connections between the Miniscrew and Anchorage Tooth on Dynamics, Efficacy, and Adverse Effects of Maxillary Second Molar Protraction: A Finite Element Analysis10.1155/2022/4714347 ↗
49. Mešić, E., Muratović, E., Redžepagić-Vražalica, L., Pervan, N., Muminović, A.J., Delić, M., and Glušac, M. (2021). Experimental & FEM Analysis of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Design on Primary Stability. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11125461 ↗
50. Incorporating tissue anisotropy and heterogeneity in finite element models of trabecular bone altered predicted local stress distributions10.1007/s10237-017-0981-8 ↗
51. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Trabecular Bone: A Review10.1115/1.4029176 ↗