One-Year Clinical Performance of Injectable and Paste-Type Composite Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Acid Etching: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Source abstract
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are common defects in adults that can lead to dentin hypersensitivity and aesthetic concerns, for which composite resin restorations currently represent the gold standard of care. However, evidence regarding the long-term clinical superiority of high-filled injectable composites and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-based cavity preparation remains limited. The present study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical performance of two different surface preparation protocols (Er,Cr:YSGG laser vs. conventional bur preparation with phosphoric acid etching) and two composite resin types (high-filled injectable vs. conventional paste-type) in the restoration of NCCLs. Methods: In this prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial, a total of 168 NCCLs in 27 patients were restored. Lesions were randomly allocated to four groups according to the combination of surface preparation (Er,Cr:YSGG laser or phosphoric acid etching) and high-filled injectable composite (G-ænial Universal Injectable) or paste-type composite (G-ænial Anterior). The same universal adhesive system was used in all cases. Clinical evaluations were performed by a blinded examiner at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months, using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, 25 patients and 150 restorations were available for evaluation, corresponding to a recall rate of 98.22%. High clinical acceptability was observed in all groups with respect to aesthetic, functional, and biological parameters. Retention was 100% in the acid-etched paste-type composite group and ranged from 94.7% to 97.4% in the remaining groups, with no statistically significant differences among groups (p > 0.05). A transient increase in postoperative sensitivity was detected in the laser groups at the 1-week evaluation (p = 0.026); however, sensitivity scores declined to zero in all groups at 6 months and 1 year. Conclusions: High-filled injectable composites demonstrated 1-year clinical performance comparable to that of conventional paste-type composites in the restoration of NCCLs. Er,Cr: YSGG laser-based cavity conditioning produced outcomes similar to conventional phosphoric acid etching with respect to retention, marginal adaptation, and biological compatibility. The early increase in laser-related postoperative sensitivity was transient and did not compromise long-term clinical success. Taken together, the ease of application and favorable clinical performance of injectable composites indicate that these materials constitute a reliable alternative for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Erosion and Treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65080, Türkiye
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65080, Türkiye
Funding
Van Yuzuncu Yil University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Prevalence of Noncarious Cervical Lesions Among Adults: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103285 ↗
2. Patano, A., Malcangi, G., De Santis, M., Morolla, R., Settanni, V., Piras, F., Inchingolo, A., Mancini, A., Inchingolo, F., and Dipalma, G. (2023). Conservative Treatment of Dental Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Scoping Review. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11061530 ↗
3. Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs): Morphology and progression, prevalence, etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical guidelines for restoration10.1111/jopr.13585 ↗
4. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: When, why, and how
5. Amin, F., Fareed, M., Zafar, M.S., Khurshid, Z., Palma, P., and Kumar, N. (2022). Degradation and Stabilization of Resin-Dentine Interfaces in Polymeric Dental Adhesives: An Updated Review. Coatings, 12.10.3390/coatings12081094 ↗
6. Mokeem, L., Garcia, I., and Melo, M. (2023). Degradation and Failure Phenomena at the Dentin Bonding Interface. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11051256 ↗
7. The challenges of composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions10.12968/denu.2025.52.5.340 ↗
8. Surface Pretreatments for Enhancing Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Sclerotic Dentin in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106123 ↗
9. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.007 ↗
10. Is clinical behavior of composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions influenced by the application mode of universal adhesives? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.017 ↗
11. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL—A randomized controlled clinical trial10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358 ↗
12. Three-year Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
13. Tzimas, K., Pappa, E., Fostiropoulou, M., Papazoglou, E., and Rahiotis, C. (2025). Highly Filled Flowable Composite Resins as Sole Restorative Materials: A Systematic Review. Materials, 18.10.20944/preprints202503.1030.v1 ↗
14. Rajabi, H., Denny, M., Karagiannopoulos, K., and Petridis, H. (2024). Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17194749 ↗
15. Randomized controlled clinical trial of a highly filled flowable composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year results10.1007/s00784-021-03901-z ↗
16. Moharam, L., Salem, H., Abdou, A., and Afifi, R. (2025). Outcome of Er, Cr:YSGG laser and antioxidant pretreatments on bonding quality to caries-induced dentin. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-024-05390-4 ↗
17. Effect of different types of adhesive systems on the bond strength and marginal integrity of composite restorations in cavities prepared with the erbium laser—A systematic review10.1007/s10103-021-03294-1 ↗
18. Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Zhang, J., and Li, Y. (2020). Does Er,Cr:YSGG reduce the microleakage of restorations when used for cavity preparation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health, 20.10.1186/s12903-020-01252-x ↗
19. Heyder, M., Sigusch, B., Hoder-Przyrembel, C., Schuetze, J., Kranz, S., and Reise, M. (2022). Clinical effects of laser-based cavity preparation on class V resin-composite fillings. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0270312 ↗
20. Pappa, E., Gkavela, G., Sampri, I., Masouras, K., Rahiotis, C., and Kakaboura, A. (2024). A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial of Three Bonding Techniques in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions. Medicina, 60.10.20944/preprints202404.1636.v1 ↗
21. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study10.1016/S0002-8177(91)25015-1 ↗
22. Does a new formula have an input in the clinical success of posterior composite restorations? A chat study10.1007/s00784-020-03472-5 ↗
23. Surface conditioning of artificial caries lesions with Er, Cr:YSGG laser before resin infiltration: An in vitro study10.1007/s41547-024-00216-6 ↗
24. FDI World Dental Federation—Clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples
25. Influence of different viscosity and chemical composition of flowable composite resins: A 48-month split-mouth double-blind randomized clinical trial10.1016/j.dental.2024.07.034 ↗
26. Manarte-Monteiro, P., Domingues, J., Teixeira, L., Gavinha, S., and Manso, M. (2021). Universal Adhesives and Adhesion Modes in Non-Carious Cervical Restorations: 2-Year Randomised Clinical Trial. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14010033 ↗
27. Multi-Mode adhesives performance and success/retention rates in NCCLs restorations: Randomised clinical trial one-year report
28. Clinical performance of preheating thermoviscous composite resin for non-carious cervical lesions restoration: A 24-month randomized clinical trial10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104930 ↗
29. Yurdagüven, G.Y., Doğruer, I., Çam, M., Ulukapı, H., and Aykor, A.A. (2025). Clinical evaluation of different solvent type and HEMA-content of universal adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions: A two-year double-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-07081-0 ↗
30. Clinical performance of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A four-year randomized clinical trial10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105529 ↗
31. Fernández, E., Gil, A.C., Caviedes, R., Díaz, L., and Bersezio, C. (J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2025). Clinical Longevity of Direct Dental Restorations: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews, J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., online ahead of print.10.1111/jerd.70052 ↗
32. Composite restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?10.1002/cre2.310 ↗
33. Comparison of the 2-year clinical performances of class II restorations using different restorative materials10.1007/s00784-025-06207-6 ↗
34. Basheer, R., Hasanain, F., and Abuelenain, D. (2024). Evaluating flexure properties, hardness, roughness and microleakage of high-strength injectable dental composite: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 24.10.1186/s12903-024-04333-3 ↗
35. Viscosity modulation of resin composites versus hand application on internal adaptation of restorations10.1007/s00784-022-04452-7 ↗
36. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009 ↗
37. Dentinal tubule occlusion using Er:YAG Laser: An in vitro study10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0266 ↗
38. Evaluation of dentinal tubule occlusion and pulp tissue response after using 980-nm diode laser for dentin hypersensitivity treatment10.1007/s00784-023-05114-y ↗
39. In vitro study of the effects of diode laser on dentin hypersensitivity and evaluation of intra-pulpal temperature variation10.1007/s10103-025-04291-4 ↗
40. Effect of laser applications with different agents on dentin surface roughness, bacterial adhesion and tubule occlusion10.1007/s00784-025-06443-w ↗
41. Marginal Adaptation of Flowable vs Sonically Activated or Preheated Resin Composites in Cervical Lesions
42. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.010 ↗
43. Dietschi, D., Askari, M., Rossier, I., Caseiro, L., Krejci, I., Leprince, J., Di Bella, E., and Ardu, S. (2023). Marginal Adaptation of In Vitro Class II Restorations Made Out of Bulk or Conventional Composite Using Single- or Multi-Layered Techniques. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16186325 ↗
44. Effect of erbium family laser etching on shear bond strength of enamel surfaces: A meta-analysis-PRISMA10.1097/MD.0000000000030990 ↗