journal article·2026-02-11Open access

Efficiency of Orthodontic Adhesives: Influence of Saliva and Shear Direction—In Vitro Study

Tatiana Ignatova-Mishutina, Elena Xuriguera, Nuno Gustavo d’Oliveira, Meritxell Sánchez-Molins

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etch adhesives under dry and saliva-contaminated conditions, while also assessing the impact of shear force direction. Extracted molars were bonded with Transbond XT™ (T), Transbond MIP™ (M), or Scotchbond Universal™ (S) under dry or saliva-contaminated conditions. Debonding was performed at 90° or 45°, introducing a clinically relevant but underexplored variable in orthodontic bond-strength testing. ARI scores were assessed via stereomicroscopy and visual inspection. Statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney) showed no significant SBS differences among adhesives under identical conditions (p > 0.05). However, all adhesives exhibited significantly reduced SBS under saliva contamination (p < 0.001; T: 5.4 vs. 4.1 MPa; M: 5.7 vs. 3.6 MPa; S: 5.5 vs. 4.5 MPa). In dry conditions, SBS was significantly higher with 45° debonding (p < 0.05). Under contamination, SBS varied by ARI score (p = 0.05), with ARI 0 specimens showing higher SBS than ARI 3. These findings confirm that moisture reduces bond strength across adhesive types, while 45° force application enhances SBS under dry conditions. ARI score variability under contamination may reflect complex failure modes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Barcelona, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain

Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de Barcelona, Carrer Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Funding

University of Barcelona Chairs · 3M Healthcare

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4 ↗
2. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols10.1093/ejo/22.1.13 ↗
3. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using adhesive systems mixed with TiO2 nanoparticles10.1590/2177-6709.23.4.43.e1-7.onl ↗
4. Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes10.1093/ejo/cjm103 ↗
5. Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index: Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x ↗
6. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666 ↗
7. A comparative investigation into relative bond strengths of Damon3, Damon3MX, and APC II brackets using different primer and adhesive combinations10.1093/ejo/cjr112 ↗
8. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011 ↗
9. Bonded molar tubes: A survey of their use by specialist orthodontists10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000016 ↗
10. Comparison of shear bond strength and ARI of four different adhesive systems used to bond molar tubes: An in vitro study10.1016/j.ortho.2020.11.001 ↗
11. Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength using different cementing agents in molar and premolar attachments10.1080/01694243.2013.857632 ↗
12. Demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets with fluoride releasing and conventional bonding agents10.4103/0970-9290.191894 ↗
13. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces10.1177/00220345550340060801 ↗
14. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems10.2319/100507-481.1 ↗
15. A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems
16. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro study10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.026 ↗
17. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032 ↗
18. Microphotographic Assessment of Enamel Surface using Self-Etching Primer and Conventional Phosphoric Acid: An In vitro Study10.4103/ccd.ccd_647_17 ↗
19. Examination of the enamel-adhesive interface with focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.017 ↗
20. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.33.e1-8.onl ↗
21. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives10.4103/2278-0203.132892 ↗
22. An in vivo investigation into bond failure rates with a new self-etching system10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00403-7 ↗
23. Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: A randomized clinical trial10.1093/ejo/26.6.565 ↗
24. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives10.19082/3584 ↗
25. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics10.1016/S0002-9416(77)90394-3 ↗
26. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.006 ↗
27. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination10.1016/j.jcma.2016.10.003 ↗
28. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8 ↗
29. Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin10.4103/1305-7456.156848 ↗
30. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001 ↗
31. Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis10.1177/070674379403900303 ↗
32. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding10.1093/ejo/cjm052 ↗
33. Bond strength comparison of moisture- insensitive primers10.1067/mod.2002.126594 ↗
34. Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and nano Adhesives: A Comparative In-Vitro Study10.4103/ccd.ccd_842_18 ↗
35. Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens
36. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Different Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesives-An In vitro Study10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01017.X ↗
37. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: An in vivo comparative study10.1016/0889-5406(89)90169-8 ↗
38. An in vitro study to compare the effect of two etching techniques on the tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to base metal alloy and enamel10.1007/s13191-012-0214-x ↗
39. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use
40. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: The picture we miss and its clinical relevance10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.015 ↗
41. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics10.1179/bjo.21.1.33 ↗