Efficiency of Orthodontic Adhesives: Influence of Saliva and Shear Direction—In Vitro Study
Source abstract
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etch adhesives under dry and saliva-contaminated conditions, while also assessing the impact of shear force direction. Extracted molars were bonded with Transbond XT™ (T), Transbond MIP™ (M), or Scotchbond Universal™ (S) under dry or saliva-contaminated conditions. Debonding was performed at 90° or 45°, introducing a clinically relevant but underexplored variable in orthodontic bond-strength testing. ARI scores were assessed via stereomicroscopy and visual inspection. Statistical tests (Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney) showed no significant SBS differences among adhesives under identical conditions (p > 0.05). However, all adhesives exhibited significantly reduced SBS under saliva contamination (p < 0.001; T: 5.4 vs. 4.1 MPa; M: 5.7 vs. 3.6 MPa; S: 5.5 vs. 4.5 MPa). In dry conditions, SBS was significantly higher with 45° debonding (p < 0.05). Under contamination, SBS varied by ARI score (p = 0.05), with ARI 0 specimens showing higher SBS than ARI 3. These findings confirm that moisture reduces bond strength across adhesive types, while 45° force application enhances SBS under dry conditions. ARI score variability under contamination may reflect complex failure modes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Barcelona, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, s/n, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de Barcelona, Carrer Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Funding
University of Barcelona Chairs · 3M Healthcare
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: Progress report10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4 ↗
2. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols10.1093/ejo/22.1.13 ↗
3. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using adhesive systems mixed with TiO2 nanoparticles10.1590/2177-6709.23.4.43.e1-7.onl ↗
4. Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes10.1093/ejo/cjm103 ↗
5. Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index: Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x ↗
6. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666 ↗
7. A comparative investigation into relative bond strengths of Damon3, Damon3MX, and APC II brackets using different primer and adhesive combinations10.1093/ejo/cjr112 ↗
8. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011 ↗
9. Bonded molar tubes: A survey of their use by specialist orthodontists10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000016 ↗
10. Comparison of shear bond strength and ARI of four different adhesive systems used to bond molar tubes: An in vitro study10.1016/j.ortho.2020.11.001 ↗
11. Effect of adhesive application on the shear bond strength using different cementing agents in molar and premolar attachments10.1080/01694243.2013.857632 ↗
12. Demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets with fluoride releasing and conventional bonding agents10.4103/0970-9290.191894 ↗
13. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces10.1177/00220345550340060801 ↗
14. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems10.2319/100507-481.1 ↗
15. A comparison of the shear bond strength of a resin cement and two orthodontic resin adhesive systems
16. Three-dimensional measurement of residual adhesive and enamel loss on teeth after debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro study10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.026 ↗
17. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032 ↗
18. Microphotographic Assessment of Enamel Surface using Self-Etching Primer and Conventional Phosphoric Acid: An In vitro Study10.4103/ccd.ccd_647_17 ↗
19. Examination of the enamel-adhesive interface with focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopy10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.017 ↗
20. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods10.1590/2177-6709.24.4.33.e1-8.onl ↗
21. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives10.4103/2278-0203.132892 ↗
22. An in vivo investigation into bond failure rates with a new self-etching system10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00403-7 ↗
23. Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: A randomized clinical trial10.1093/ejo/26.6.565 ↗
24. Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives10.19082/3584 ↗
25. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics10.1016/S0002-9416(77)90394-3 ↗
26. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.006 ↗
27. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with two different bonding agents under dry conditions and with saliva contamination10.1016/j.jcma.2016.10.003 ↗
28. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8 ↗
29. Effect of storage solutions on microhardness of crown enamel and dentin10.4103/1305-7456.156848 ↗
30. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.10.001 ↗
31. Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis10.1177/070674379403900303 ↗
32. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding10.1093/ejo/cjm052 ↗
33. Bond strength comparison of moisture- insensitive primers10.1067/mod.2002.126594 ↗
34. Shear Bond Strength and Bonding Properties of Orthodontic and nano Adhesives: A Comparative In-Vitro Study10.4103/ccd.ccd_842_18 ↗
35. Effect of thermal cycling on temperature changes and bond strength in different test specimens
36. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Different Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesives-An In vitro Study10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01017.X ↗
37. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: An in vivo comparative study10.1016/0889-5406(89)90169-8 ↗
38. An in vitro study to compare the effect of two etching techniques on the tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to base metal alloy and enamel10.1007/s13191-012-0214-x ↗
39. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use
40. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: The picture we miss and its clinical relevance10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.015 ↗
41. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics10.1179/bjo.21.1.33 ↗