Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates of Crown Restorations with Various Endodontic Posts: A Retrospective Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate long-term outcomes lcomplication rates of crown restorations supported by different types of endodontic posts and to determine the influence of post material on biological and technical outcomes. Materials and Methods: Clinical and radiographic data from 437 crowned teeth retained by fiber, metallic, or custom-made posts were collected at Qassim University Dental Hospital between August and November 2025. Biological (secondary caries, periapical lesions) and technical (debonding, fracture, chipping) complications were recorded. Kaplan–Meier and life-table analyses were used to estimate complication-free survival, and Cox regression was employed to identify significant predictors (α = 0.05). Results: The mean observation period was 6.76 ± 4.88 years. The overall complication rate was 56.8%. Crowns restored with fiber posts exhibited the lowest complication rate (40.0%) and the highest 15-year cumulative survival (52%), followed by custom-made (38%) and metallic posts (15%). Fiber posts demonstrated a significantly lower hazard of complications than metal posts (HR = 1.70, p = 0.009). Female sex (HR = 1.69, p = 0.001) and mandibular location (HR = 1.36, p = 0.048) were associated with increased risk. Metal–ceramic crowns showed a protective effect compared to ceramic crowns (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The type of post significantly affected long-term prognosis of crowned endodontically treated teeth. Fiber posts provided the most favorable outcomes by minimizing catastrophic root fractures, while metallic and custom-made posts demonstrated higher complication hazards. Crown material, arch location, and patient factors further influenced survival outcomes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetics Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Buraidah 51452, Saudi Arabia
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Survival rates against fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with full-coverage crowns or resin composite restorations: A systematic review10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.157 ↗
2. Post-endodontic restorative treatments and their mechanical behavior: A narrative review10.1016/j.dentre.2023.100067 ↗
3. “Ferrule Comes First. Post Is Second!” Fake News and Alternative Facts? A Systematic Review10.1016/j.joen.2017.09.020 ↗
4. Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treated teeth: Findings from a survey with dentists
5. Survey of dentists to determine contemporary use of endodontic posts10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.015 ↗
6. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.006 ↗
7. Fabricating a custom zirconia post-and-core without a post-and-core pattern or a scan post10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.004 ↗
8. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: A representative survey in Germany10.1007/s00784-015-1505-5 ↗
9. Influence of Different Post-endodontic Restorations on the Survival Rate Against Fracture of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Affected by Cervical Lesions with Pulpal Involvement: A Retrospective Clinical Study10.14744/eej.2023.15870 ↗
10. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.2334/josnusd.24-0098 ↗
11. Clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: Up-to ten-year results10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.014 ↗
12. Secondary caries in fixed dental prostheses: Long-term clinical evaluation10.1002/cre2.696 ↗
13. Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.002 ↗
14. Alenezi, A., and Aloqayli, S. (2023). Technical complications with tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) of different span lengths: An up to 15-year retrospective study. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-03121-9 ↗
15. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass-fiber versus metal posts in single-crowned teeth: 15 Year follow-up10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105694 ↗
16. Complications of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and single crowns or fixed dental prostheses—A systematic review10.1007/s00784-016-1919-8 ↗
17. Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: A systematic review10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0064 ↗
18. Fracture resistances of zirconia, cast Ni-Cr, and fiber-glass composite posts under all-ceramic crowns in endodontically treated premolars10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.170 ↗
19. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011 ↗
20. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber–supported postendodontic restoration: A prospective observational clinical study10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.003 ↗
21. Ferrule effect: A literature review10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.024 ↗
22. Long-term evaluation of post restorations: Results from a practice-based study with up to 20 years of follow-up10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106238 ↗
23. Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
24. Post-Retained Single Crowns versus Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 7-Year Prospective Clinical Study10.1177/0022034517724146 ↗
25. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 ↗
26. The Simplified Oral Hygiene Index10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034 ↗
27. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003 ↗
28. Influence of ferrule, post system, and length on stress distribution of weakened root-filled teeth10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.015 ↗
29. Postendodontic Restoration: Endodontic Post-and-Core or No Post At All?
30. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns10.1111/clr.13306 ↗
31. Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses10.1111/clr.13871 ↗
32. Longevity and Risk Factors of Post Restorations after up to 15 Years: A Practice-based Study10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.009 ↗
33. Comparing survival rates of endodontically treated teeth restored either with glass-fiber-reinforced or metal posts: A systematic review and meta-analyses10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.003 ↗