Osteogenic and Biocompatibility Potential of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials: A Systematic Review of Human Primary Cells Studies
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) relies on barrier membranes, for which polylactic acid (PLA) and its copolymer poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are promising biodegradable polymers. However, their inherent hydrophobicity limits biological performance, and the evidence regarding how specific modifications affect key human cell types, particularly osteoblasts and fibroblasts, remains scattered. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to synthesize the in vitro evidence on the response of primary human osteoblasts and fibroblasts to polylactic acid-based materials. Following a pre-registered protocol (10.17605/OSF.IO/CE8KB), a comprehensive search was performed across four major databases, and the risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using an adapted OHAT tool. Results: Twenty-six studies were included, which showed that polylactic acid-based materials have limited bioactivity, and their modification significantly improves cellular responses. The incorporation of bioceramics and growth factors, or alterations in surface topography, notably enhanced osteogenic differentiation and mineralization in osteoblasts. For gingival fibroblasts, topographical modifications like micro-grooves guided cell alignment and modulated proliferation. Conclusions: Native polylactic acid-based materials display limited bioactivity. However, functionalization through bioceramics incorporation, growth factor delivery, and surface topographical modification is crucial for transforming them into bioactive scaffolds capable of achieving the dual biofunctionality required for successful GBR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Santo Tomas de Aquino, Bucaramanga 680006, Colombia
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga—UNAB, Bucaramanga 681003, Colombia
Banco Multitejidos y Centro de Terapias Avanzadas, Clínica FOSCAL Internacional, Floridablanca 681004, Colombia
Oral Peri-Implant Research Group, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15833, Peru
Funding
Universidad Científica del Sur
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Implant Placement Post-Extraction in Esthetic Single-Tooth Sites: When Immediate, When Early, When Late?10.1111/prd.12170 ↗
2. Membrane Barriers for Guided Bone Regeneration: An Overview of Available Biomaterials10.1111/prd.12502 ↗
3. Guided Bone Regeneration in Implant Dentistry: Basic Principle, Progress over 35 Years, and Recent Research Activities10.1111/prd.12539 ↗
4. Degradation Mechanisms and Acceleration Strategies of Poly(Lactic Acid) Scaffold for Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110066 ↗
5. Horizontal Bone-Augmentation Procedures in Implant Dentistry: Prosthetically Guided Regeneration10.1111/prd.12219 ↗
6. 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid: Recent Advances and Opportunities10.1007/s00170-022-10795-y ↗
7. Polylactide Degradation Activates Immune Cells by Metabolic Reprogramming10.1002/advs.202304632 ↗
8. Shalem, A., Yehezkeli, O., and Fishman, A. (2024). Enzymatic Degradation of Polylactic Acid (PLA). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 108.10.1007/s00253-024-13212-4 ↗
9. Castañeda-Rodríguez, S., González-Torres, M., Ribas-Aparicio, R.M., Del Prado-Audelo, M.L., Leyva-Gómez, G., Gürer, E.S., and Sharifi-Rad, J. (2023). Recent Advances in Modified Poly(Lactic Acid) as Tissue Engineering Materials. J. Biol. Eng., 17.10.1186/s13036-023-00338-8 ↗
10. Meng, C., Liu, X., Li, R., Malekmohammadi, S., Feng, Y., Song, J., Gong, R.H., and Li, J. (2024). 3D Poly (L-lactic acid) fibrous sponge with interconnected porous structure for bone tissue scaffold. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 268.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131688 ↗
11. Meng, C., Liu, X., and Li, J. (2024). Hierarchical porous PLLA/ACP fibrous membrane towards bone tissue scaffold. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 152.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106455 ↗
12. Chemical Enhancements and Advanced Manufacturing Methods of Poly(Lactic Acid) for Tissue Engineering Applications10.1016/j.polymer.2024.127691 ↗
13. Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.019 ↗
14. A Phenotypic Comparison of Osteoblast Cell Lines versus Human Primary Osteoblasts for Biomaterials Testing10.1002/jbm.a.34937 ↗
15. In Vitro Evaluation of Bone Cell Response to Novel 3D-Printable Nanocomposite Biomaterials for Bone Reconstruction10.1002/jbm.a.37719 ↗
16. 3D Printing of PLA:CaP:GO Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Applications10.1039/D3RA00981E ↗
17. Annunziata, M., Nastri, L., Cecoro, G., and Guida, L. (2017). The Use of Poly-d,l-lactic Acid (PDLLA) Devices for Bone Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review. Molecules, 22.10.3390/molecules22122214 ↗
18. Use of 3D-printed polylactic acid/bioceramic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering in preclinical in vivo studies: A systematic review10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.013 ↗
19. Correlation between Surface Properties of Polystyrene and Polylactide Materials and Fibroblast and Osteoblast Cell Line Behavior: A Critical Overview of the Literature10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00214 ↗
20. Zhou, Z., Yun, J., Li, J., Chen, Y., Duan, T., Wang, L., Han, J., Jiang, H.B., and Niu, G. (2023). Comparison of the efficacy of different biodegradable membranes in guided bone/tissue regeneration: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Biomed. Mater., 18.10.1088/1748-605X/acc99a ↗
21. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
22. Assessing Risk of Bias in Human Environmental Epidemiology Studies Using Three Tools: Different Conclusions from Different Tools10.1186/s13643-020-01490-8 ↗
23. Osteoinduction: A Review of Old Concepts with New Standards10.1177/0022034511435260 ↗
24. Human Gingival Fibroblast Secretome Accelerates Wound Healing through Anti-Inflammatory and Pro-Angiogenic Mechanisms10.1038/s41536-020-00109-9 ↗
25. In Vitro Comparison of Bioabsorbable and Non-Resorbable Membranes in Bone Regeneration10.1902/jop.2001.72.6.753 ↗
26. Biomembranes Enriched with TGF-β1 Favor Bone Matrix Protein Expression by Human Osteoblasts In Vitro10.1002/jbm.10301 ↗
27. A Comparison of Polymer and Polymer-Hydroxyapatite Composite Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Use in Bone Regeneration: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study10.1002/jbm.a.34926 ↗
28. BMP2 Cross-Linked by Transglutaminase 2 to Collagen-PLLA Scaffold Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation in Mesenchymal Stem Cells10.1007/s10529-014-1551-0 ↗
29. Osteoblasts Interaction with PLGA Membranes Functionalized with Titanium Film Nanolayer by PECVD: In Vitro Assessment of Surface Influence on Cell Adhesion during Initial Cell–Material Interaction10.3390/ma7031687 ↗
30. Terriza, A., Vilches-Pérez, J.I., De la Orden, E., Yubero, F., González-Caballero, J.L., González-Elipe, A.R., Vilches, J., and Salido, M. (2014). Osteoconductive Potential of Barrier NanoSiO2 PLGA Membranes Functionalized by Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition. Biomed. Res. Int., 2014.10.1155/2014/253590 ↗
31. Synergistic Interaction of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) with the Surface of PLLA/Col/HA and PLLA/HA Scaffolds Produces Rapid Osteogenic Differentiation. Colloids Surf10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.053 ↗
32. Layer-by-Layer Bioassembly of Cellularized Polylactic Acid Porous Membranes for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1007/s10856-017-5887-6 ↗
33. Fu, L., Wang, Z., Dong, S., Cai, Y., Ni, Y., Zhang, T., Wang, L., and Zhou, Y. (2017). Bilayer Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid)/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Membrane with Barrier Function and Osteogenesis Promotion for Guided Bone Regeneration. Materials, 10.10.3390/ma10030257 ↗
34. Wu, S., Xiao, Z., Song, J., Li, M., and Li, W. (2018). Evaluation of BMP-2 Enhances the Osteoblast Differentiation of Human Amnion Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded on Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Collagen/Poly(L-Lactide). Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19082171 ↗
35. Kang, I.G., Kim, J., Park, S., Kim, H.E., and Han, C.M. (2020). PLLA Membrane with Embedded Hydroxyapatite Patterns for Improved Bioactivity and Efficient Delivery of Growth Factor. Macromol. Biosci., 20.10.1002/mabi.202000136 ↗
36. Chen, Y., Lee, K., Yang, Y., Kawazoe, N., and Chen, G. (2020). PLGA–Collagen–ECM Hybrid Meshes Mimicking Stepwise Osteogenesis and Their Influence on the Osteogenic Differentiation of hMSCs. Biofabrication, 12.10.1088/1758-5090/ab782b ↗
37. Development of a “Mechano-Active” Scaffold for Tissue Engineering10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00342-8 ↗
38. Janus Porous Polylactic Acid Membranes with Versatile Metal–Phenolic Interface for Biomimetic Periodontal Bone Regeneration10.1038/s41536-023-00305-3 ↗
39. Increased Osteoblast Functions among Nanophase Titania/Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide) Composites of the Highest Nanometer Surface Roughness10.1002/jbm.a.30734 ↗
40. Morphology and Adhesion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on PLLA, Apatite and Apatite/Collagen Surfaces10.1007/s10856-007-3195-2 ↗
41. Human Bone-Derived Cell Culture on PLGA Flat Sheet Membranes of Different Lactide:Glycolide Ratio10.1002/bit.21902 ↗
42. Scaffold’s Surface Geometry Significantly Affects Human Stem Cell Bone Tissue Engineering10.1002/jcp.21175 ↗
43. The Influence of Coupling Agents on Mechanical Property Retention and Long-Term Cytocompatibility of Phosphate Glass Fibre-Reinforced PLA Composites10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.014 ↗
44. Effective Immobilization of BMP-2 Mediated by Polydopamine Coating on Biodegradable Nanofibers for Enhanced In Vivo Bone Formation10.1021/am501391z ↗
45. Core–Shell PLGA/Collagen Nanofibers Loaded with Recombinant FN/CDHs as Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds10.3109/03008207.2014.918112 ↗
46. Poly-Lactic Acid Nanopillar Array-Driven Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Determined by Pillar Diameter10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04747 ↗
47. Migration of Human Gingival Fibroblasts over Guided Tissue Regeneration Barrier Materials10.1902/jop.1996.67.3.236 ↗
48. Evaluation of Initial Attachment of Human Gingival Fibroblast Cells to Biodegradable Membranes In Vitro by Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy10.2334/josnusd.41.57 ↗
49. A PLGA Membrane Controlling Cell Behaviour for Promoting Tissue Regeneration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.055 ↗
50. Potential Role of Integrin α5β1/Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) and Actin Cytoskeleton in the Mechanotransduction and Response of Human Gingival Fibroblasts Cultured on a Three-Dimensional PLGA Scaffold10.12659/MSM.921626 ↗
51. Su, H., Fujiwara, T., Skalli, O., Selders, G.S., Li, T., Mao, L., and Bumgardner, J.D. (2024). Porous Nano-Fiber Structure of Modified Electrospun Chitosan GBR Membranes Improves Osteoblast Calcium Phosphate Deposition in Osteoblast–Fibroblast Co-Cultures. Mar. Drugs, 22.10.3390/md22040160 ↗
52. Cell Lines: Valuable Tools or Useless Artifacts10.4161/spmg.19885 ↗