Synergistic Effects of Simulated Energy Drink Exposure and Fatigue Loading on Bioactive and Conventional Resin Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The consumption of energy and sports drinks is on the rise globally, exposing dental restorations to more frequent low-pH challenges, which affect degradation. This in vitro study simulated the combined effect of energy drink exposure and cyclic fatigue loading on the fatigue survival rate and flexural strength of three direct dental resin restorative materials with distinct chemistries: a bioactive ionic resin (Activa Presto), a giomer (Beautifil Flow Plus F00) and a conventional nano-hybrid composite (Tetric Ceram). Bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were fabricated according to ISO 4049 and stored for 24 h in either distilled water or 0.2 M citric acid (pH ≈ 2.5), simulating an energy drink (n = 10/group). The samples then underwent chewing simulation (40 N, 100,000 cycles, 1.6 Hz) using a steel antagonist; surviving specimens were tested via three-point bending to determine their flexural strength. All the materials were affected by storage conditions: Activa Presto showed the lowest fatigue survival (20% in water; 0% in citric acid), Tetric N-Ceram moderate survival (40% in both solutions) and Beautifil Flow Plus F00 the highest and most stable survival (90% in water; 40% in citric acid). Among the surviving specimens, Tetric Ceram exhibited the highest flexural strength, followed by Beautifil Flow Plus F00 and then Activa Presto. Citric acid exposure and cyclic loading adversely affected the mechanical performance of all the materials within the limitations of this study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Dental Health and Care Utilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
Funding
KAU Endowment (WAQF) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Resin composite—State of the art10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 ↗
2. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0022034514544217 ↗
3. Clinical Longevity of Complex Direct Posterior Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.2341/24-007-LIT ↗
4. Ferracane, J.L. (2024). A Historical Perspective on Dental Composite Restorative Materials. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15070173 ↗
5. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations—An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters10.1016/j.dental.2021.10.018 ↗
6. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4 ↗
7. Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.11.002 ↗
8. Prevalence of energy drink consumption world-wide: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/add.16390 ↗
9. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00380-0 ↗
10. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005 ↗
11. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products10.1177/10454411010120020401 ↗
12. Effect of Chemical Challenges on the Properties of Composite Resins10.1155/2021/4895846 ↗
13. Therapeutic effects of novel resin bonding systems containing bioactive glasses on mineral-depleted areas within the bonded-dentine interface10.1007/s10856-012-4606-6 ↗
14. The rise of advanced bioactive restorative materials: Are they redefining operative dentistry?10.1016/j.dental.2025.08.003 ↗
15. Giomers in dentistry—At the boundary between dental composites and glass-ionomers10.15386/mpr-1169 ↗
16. Flexural Properties of Contemporary Bioactive Restorative Materials: Effect of Environmental pH10.2341/21-202-L ↗
17. Effects of an Acidic Environment on the Strength and Chemical Changes of Resin-based Composites10.2341/22-031-L ↗
18. (2019). Dentistry—Polymer-Based Restorative Materials (Standard No. ISO 4049:2019).
19. Elsharkawy, Y.M.M., Mohamed, H.T., Saeedi, T., and Farahat, A.M.S. (2025). Comparative in vitro study on wear resistance and colour stability of 3D-printed, milled, and conventional PMMA denture teeth. BMC Oral Health, 25.10.1186/s12903-025-05983-7 ↗
20. Developing an optimised method for accurate wear testing of dental materials using the ‘Rub&Roll’ device10.1038/s41598-024-68873-y ↗
21. Wear of dental materials: Clinical significance and laboratory wear simulation methods -A review10.4012/dmj.2018-140 ↗
22. Insights Into the Effects and Implications of Acidic Beverages on Resin Composite Materials in Dental Restorations: An In Vitro Study10.1111/jerd.13372 ↗
23. Long-Term Effect of Acidic Beverages on Dental Injectable Composite Resin: Microhardness, Surface Roughness, Elastic Modulus, and Flexural Strength Patterns10.1007/s11223-022-00409-z ↗
24. One-Year Clinical Evaluation of a Fluoride, Calcium, and Phosphate-Releasing New Bioactive Material versus a Fluoride-Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material in Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial10.21608/adjc.2024.319591.1627 ↗
25. S-PRG-based composites erosive wear resistance and the effect on surrounding enamel10.1038/s41598-021-03745-3 ↗
26. In Vitro Hydrolytic Degradation of Giomer-Based and Fluoride-Releasing Bulk Fill Composites Simulated for Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease10.1021/acsomega.5c00784 ↗
27. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review10.2341/17-208-T ↗
28. Erosion--diagnosis and risk factors10.1007/s00784-007-0179-z ↗
29. Factors Related to Erosive Tooth Wear throughout a Lifetime10.1159/000543570 ↗
30. The continuum of dental caries--evidence for a dynamic disease process10.1177/154405910408301s08 ↗
31. Clinical applications and outcomes of using indicators of risk in caries management10.1002/j.0022-0337.2001.65.10.tb03461.x ↗
32. Featherstone, J.D.B., Crystal, Y.O., Alston, P., Chaffee, B.W., Doméjean, S., Rechmann, P., Zhan, L., and Ramos-Gomez, F. (2021). Evidence-Based Caries Management for All Ages-Practical Guidelines. Front. Oral Health, 2.10.3389/froh.2021.657518 ↗
33. Erosive tooth wear: A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge10.1159/000360380 ↗
34. Impact of erosive conditions on tooth-colored restorative materials10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.017 ↗
35. The Chemistry of Dental Erosion and Determination of Erosion Potential10.1159/000543890 ↗
36. Terminology of Erosive Tooth Wear: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by the ORCA and the Cariology Research Group of the IADR10.1159/000503308 ↗
37. Gálvez-Bravo, F., Edwards-Toro, F., Contador-Cotroneo, R., Opazo-García, C., Contreras-Pulache, H., Goicochea-Palomino, E.A., Cruz-Gonzales, G., and Moya-Salazar, J. (2025). Erosive Potential of Sports, Energy Drinks, and Isotonic Solutions on Athletes’ Teeth: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, 17.10.3390/nu17030403 ↗
38. Evaluation of the erosive potential of soft drinks10.1055/s-0039-1698304 ↗
39. Analyses of the Erosive Potential of Various Soft Drinks and Packaged Fruit Juices on Teeth
40. Influence of pH environment on polymer based dental material properties10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.004 ↗
41. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: A literature review10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18 ↗
42. Fatigue behaviour of dental composite materials10.1016/j.jdent.2008.12.008 ↗