journal article·2025-11-11Open access

Biomechanical Influence of Different Cervical Micro-Thread Forms over Narrow-Diameter Implants (2.9 mm) Using Finite Element Analysis

Qiannian Zhang, Waikit Lau, Nalini Cheong, Tonghan Zhang

Journal of Functional Biomaterials· Volume 16· Issue 11

Abstract

Narrow-diameter implants (≤3.5 mm) have garnered significant attention due to their widespread application in areas with insufficient bone volume. However, their mechanical performance is limited. The cervical region, serving as a pivotal stress concentration zone, exhibits a thread form that directly modulates stress distribution and determines the long-term stability of the implant–bone interface. This study was designed to investigate the influence of varying thread forms and face angles on microstrain and stress distribution patterns in narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) and their adjacent cortical bone structures. Through systematic modification of implant thread forms and face angle parameters, finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to develop nine distinct implant models featuring varied geometric characteristics. Each model was implanted into Type III bone tissue, followed by the application of a 100 N occlusal force, including a vertical load and an oblique load deviated 30 degrees lingually from the long axis of the implants. Subsequent biomechanical evaluation quantified peak von Mises stress concentrations at the bone–implant interface, maximum equivalent elastic strain distributions in peri-implant bone tissue, and abutment stress profile characteristics. The results indicated that in the RB thread group, the optimal thread face angle parameter was 60 degrees; in the B thread group, this optimal thread face angle parameter was 45 degrees, whereas in the V thread group, the optimal thread face angle parameter was 30 degrees.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hospital of Stomatology, Zhongshan City, Zhongshan 528400, China

School of Stomatology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

Funding

Social Welfare and Basic Research Projects in Zhongshan City

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Systematic Review on Success of Narrow-Diameter Dental Implants10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.3 ↗
2. Group 1 Iti Consensus Report: The Influence of Implant Length and Design and Medications on Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes10.1111/clr.13342 ↗
3. Effect of Implant Diameter on Fatigue Strength10.1097/ID.0000000000000502 ↗
4. Sarul, M., Lis, J., Park, H.S., and Rumin, K. (2022). Evidence-Based Selection of Orthodontic Miniscrews, Increasing Their Success Rate in the Mandibular Buccal Shelf. A Randomized, Prospective Clinical Trial. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02460-3 ↗
5. Fracture Resistance after Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs
6. Zhang, W.T., Cheng, K.J., Liu, Y.F., Wang, R., Chen, Y.F., Ding, Y.D., Yang, F., and Wang, L.H. (2022). Effect of the Prosthetic Index on Stress Distribution in Morse Taper Connection Implant System and Peri-Implant Bone: A 3d Finite Element Analysis. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02465-y ↗
7. Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: Comparison between Matched Groups of Bruxer and Non-Bruxer Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study10.1111/cid.13161 ↗
8. Influence of Marginal Bone Resorption on Two Mini Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: An in Vitro Study10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.55 ↗
9. The Influence of the Implant-Abutment Complex on Marginal Bone and Peri-Implant Conditions: A Retrospective Study10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.46 ↗
10. Galindo-Moreno, P., Concha-Jeronimo, A., Lopez-Chaichio, L., Rodriguez-Alvarez, R., Sanchez-Fernandez, E., and Padial-Molina, M. (2021). Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10225427 ↗
11. Medina-Galvez, R., Cantó-Navés, O., Marimon, X., Cerrolaza, M., Ferrer, M., and Cabratosa-Termes, J. (2021). Bone Stress Evaluation with and without Cortical Bone Using Several Dental Restorative Materials Subjected to Impact Load: A Fully 3d Transient Finite-Element Study. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14195801 ↗
12. Influence of an Alternative Implant Design and Surgical Protocol on Primary Stability10.1590/0103-6440201902324 ↗
13. How Does Dental Implant Macrogeometry Affect Primary Implant Stability? A Narrative Review10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z ↗
14. Biomechanical Influence of Thread Form on Stress Distribution over Short Implants (≤6 mm) Using Finite Element Analysis10.1515/bmt-2020-0215 ↗
15. Influence of Three Different Implant Thread Designs on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis10.4103/0972-4052.191283 ↗
16. The Effect of Thread Pattern Upon Implant Osseointegration10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x ↗
17. The Cumulative Survival Rate of Dental Implants with Micro-Threads: A Long-Term Retrospective Study10.5051/jpis.2203240162 ↗
18. The Effect of Microthread Design on Magnitude and Distribution of Stresses in Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis10.4103/1735-3327.240475 ↗
19. Biomechanical Behavior Analysis of Four Types of Short Implants with Different Placement Depths Using the Finite Element Method10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.005 ↗
20. Yağır, M.O., Şen, Ş., and Şen, U. (2024). Examination of Various Abutment Designs Behavior Depending on Load Using Finite Element Analysis. Biomimetics, 9.10.3390/biomimetics9080498 ↗
21. Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121139 ↗
22. Dental Biomechanics of Root-Analog Implants in Different Bone Types10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.10.005 ↗
23. Finite Element Analysis Study of the Effect of Superstructure Material on Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis
24. The Biomechanical Aspects of Reconstruction for Segmental Defects of the Mandible: A Finite Element Study to Assess the Optimisation of Plate and Screw Factors10.1016/j.jcms.2013.12.005 ↗
25. Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study10.11607/jomi.6261 ↗
26. Wang, P.S., Tsai, M.H., Wu, Y.L., Chen, H.S., Lei, Y.N., and Wu, A.Y. (2023). Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant-Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14100515 ↗
27. Experimental and Fe Shear-Bonding Strength at Core/Veneer Interfaces in Bilayered Ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.001 ↗
28. Pala, E., Ozdemir, I., Grund, T., and Lampke, T. (2024). The Influence of Design on Stress Concentration Reduction in Dental Implant Systems Using the Finite Element Method. Crystals, 14.10.3390/cryst14010020 ↗
29. The Effectiveness of a New Algorithm on a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Construction of Bone Trabeculae in Implant Biomechanics10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00442.x ↗
30. Research on Influence of Mesh Parameters Modification on Solution Accuracy of Finite Element Analysis10.1088/1757-899X/1199/1/012008 ↗
31. Biomechanical Effects of Bone Quality and Design Features in Dental Implants in Long-Term Bone Stability
32. Stress Analysis and Factor of Safety in Three Dental Implant Systems by Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.08.006 ↗
33. Biological Reactions of Alveolar Bone to Orthodontic Loading of Oral Implants10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002144.x ↗
34. Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with and without Microthreads under Static and Dynamic Loading10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2017020007 ↗
35. Park, S., Park, J., Kang, I., Lee, H., and Noh, G. (2022). Effects of Assessing the Bone Remodeling Process in Biomechanical Finite Element Stability Evaluations of Dental Implants. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 221.10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106852 ↗
36. Atay, A.İ., Gültekin, B.A., and Yalçın, S. (2025). Finite Element Analysis of Trabecular-Surfaced Implants and Implant Angulation in Different Mandibular Arch Forms. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16090333 ↗
37. Biomechanical Behavior of All-on-4 Concept and Alternative Designs under Different Occlusal Load Configurations for Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 3-D Finite Element Analysis10.1007/s10266-024-00941-1 ↗
38. Cantó-Navés, O., Marimon, X., Ferrer, M., and Cabratosa-Termes, J. (2021). Comparison between Experimental Digital Image Processing and Numerical Methods for Stress Analysis in Dental Implants with Different Restorative Materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 113.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104092 ↗
39. Heterogeneous Material Models for Finite Element Analysis of the Human Mandible Bone-a Systematic Review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40668 ↗
40. A 3d Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Varying Thread Angles10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.163 ↗
41. Silva, G.A.F., Faot, F., Possebon, A., da Silva, W.J., and Del Bel Cury, A.A. (2021). Effect of Macrogeometry and Bone Type on Insertion Torque, Primary Stability, Surface Topography Damage and Titanium Release of Dental Implants During Surgical Insertion into Artificial Bone. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 119.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104515 ↗
42. Relationship between Dental Implant Macro-Design and Osseointegration: A Systematic Review10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4 ↗
43. Alemayehu, D.B., and Jeng, Y.R. (2021). Three-Dimensional Finite Element Investigation into Effects of Implant Thread Design and Loading Rate on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Anisotropic Bone. Materials, 14.10.20944/preprints202109.0221.v1 ↗
44. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of the Bone Matrix10.1038/s41413-022-00223-y ↗
45. Predicting the Output Dimensions, Porosity and Elastic Modulus of Additive Manufactured Biomaterial Structures Targeting Orthopedic Implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.07.023 ↗
46. Narrow- and Regular-Diameter Implants in the Posterior Region of the Jaws to Support Single Crowns: A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial10.1111/clr.13076 ↗
47. Use of Narrow-Diameter Implants in the Posterior Segments of the Jaws: A Retrospective Observational Study of 2 to 11 Years10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.017 ↗
48. Probability of Survival and Stress Distribution of Narrow Diameter Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Taper Angles10.1002/jbm.b.34942 ↗