Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Hybrid Abutment Crowns Made from a Tooth-Colored Ceramic Filled Hybrid Composite: A Pilot Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this pilot in vitro study is to investigate the fracture strength of hybrid abutment crowns (HACs) made of a 3D-printable, tooth-colored, ceramic-reinforced composite (CRC). Based on an upper first premolar, a crown was designed, and specimens were additively fabricated from a composite material (VarseoSmile Crown plus) (N = 32). The crowns were bonded to standard abutments using a universal resin cement. Half (n = 16) of the samples were subjected to artificial aging, during which three samples suffered minor damage. All specimens were mechanically loaded at an angle of 30° to the implant axis. In addition, an FEM simulation was computed. Statistical analysis was performed at a significance level of p < 0.05. The mean fracture load without aging was 389.04 N (SD: 101.60 N). Two HACs suffered screw fracture, while the crowns itself failed in all other specimens. In the aged specimens, the mean fracture load was 391.19 N (SD: 143.30 N). The failure mode was predominantly catastrophic crown fracture. FEM analysis showed a maximum compressive stress of 39.79 MPa, a maximum tensile stress of 173.37 MPa and a shear stress of 60.29 MPa when loaded with 389 N. Within the limitations of this pilot study, the tested 3D-printed hybrid abutment crowns demonstrated fracture resistance above a clinically acceptable threshold, suggesting promising potential for clinical application. However, further investigations with larger sample sizes, control groups, and clinical follow-up are required.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
Funding
BEGO Implant Systems (Germany)
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x ↗
2. Single implants in dorsal areas—A systematic review
3. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns10.1111/clr.13863 ↗
4. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011 ↗
5. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial10.11607/jomi.3963 ↗
6. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: A randomized controlled trial10.1111/clr.12753 ↗
7. The future of dental devices is digital10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 ↗
8. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns10.11607/jomi.7431 ↗
9. Fracture Resistance of Titanium-Based Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Implant Restorations10.1111/jopr.12765 ↗
10. Clinical performance of monolithic lithium disilicate hybrid abutment crowns over at least 3.5 years10.1111/jopr.13719 ↗
11. Current status of zirconia restoration10.1016/j.jpor.2013.09.001 ↗
12. Zarone, F., Di Mauro, M.I., Ausiello, P., Ruggiero, G., and Sorrentino, R. (2019). Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health, 19.10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x ↗
13. Three-dimensional (3D) printing in dental practice: Applications, areas of interest, and level of evidence10.1007/s00784-023-04983-7 ↗
14. Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of lithium disilicate glass ceramic for dental applications10.1016/j.msec.2020.111180 ↗
15. Branco, A.C., Colaço, R., Figueiredo-Pina, C.G., and Serro, A.P. (2023). Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16051860 ↗
16. Short communication: In vitro pilot study: Are monolithic 3Y-TZP zirconia crowns too strong for titanium Implants?10.11607/ijp.7322 ↗
17. Biomechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns on one-piece zirconia implants after long-term chewing simulation10.1186/s40729-018-0127-5 ↗
18. In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.003 ↗
19. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites10.1111/jerd.13371 ↗
20. Comparison of the accuracy of resin-composite crowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and milling methods10.4012/dmj.2022-074 ↗
21. Abad-Coronel, C., Freire Bonilla, C., Vidal, S., Rosero, F., Encalada Abad, C., Mena Córdova, N., Paltan, A., Fajardo, J.I., and Aliaga, P. (2025). Evaluating a Novel 3D-Printed Resin for Dental Restorations: Fracture Resistance of Restorations Fabricated by Digital Press Stereolithography. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17172322 ↗
22. Güney, B., Nalbant, A.D., and Bankoğlu Güngör, M. (2025). Comparison of the Fracture Resistance of Provisional Crowns and Fixed Partial Dentures Manufactured with Conventional, Milling, and 3D-Printing Techniques. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15126539 ↗
23. Microstructural investigation of hybrid CAD/CAM restorative dental materials by micro-CT and SEM10.1016/j.dental.2024.04.006 ↗
24. Graf, T., Erdelt, K.J., Guth, J.F., Edelhoff, D., Schubert, O., and Schweiger, J. (2022). Influence of Pre-Treatment and Artificial Aging on the Retention of 3D-Printed Permanent Composite Crowns. Biomedicines, 10.10.3390/biomedicines10092186 ↗
25. Grzebieluch, W., Kowalewski, P., Grygier, D., Rutkowska-Gorczyca, M., Kozakiewicz, M., and Jurczyszyn, K. (2021). Printable and Machinable Dental Restorative Composites for CAD/CAM Application—Comparison of Mechanical Properties, Fractographic, Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14174919 ↗
26. Mechanical Characteristics of Composite Resins Produced by Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing
27. 3D-printed and conventional provisional single crown fabrication on anterior implants: A randomized clinical trial10.1016/j.dental.2023.12.004 ↗
28. Influence of monolithic restorative materials on the implant-abutment interface of hybrid abutment crowns: An in vitro investigation10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00115 ↗
29. Othman, A., Sandmair, M., Alevizakos, V., and von See, C. (2023). The fracture resistance of 3D-printed versus milled provisional crowns: An in vitro study. PLoS ONE, 18.10.1371/journal.pone.0285760 ↗
30. Marginal gap and fracture resistance of implant-supported 3D-printed definitive composite crowns: An in vitro study10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104216 ↗
31. (2017). Dentistry—Implants—Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants (Standard No. DIN EN ISO 14801:2017-03).
32. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences10.3758/BF03193146 ↗
33. Laboratory methods to simulate the mechanical degradation of resin composite restorations10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.006 ↗
34. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Failure Modes of Maxillary Premolars Restored with Different Coronal Designed Fiber Posts: In Vitro Study
35. Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: A systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.005 ↗
36. Proliferation and adhesion capability of human gingival fibroblasts onto zirconia, lithium disilicate and feldspathic veneering ceramic in vitro10.4012/dmj.2013-185 ↗
37. Jung, S., Moser, M.M., Kleinheinz, J., and Happe, A. (2021). Biocompatibility of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Oxide Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies for Dental Implant Abutments. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22147700 ↗
38. Retention and marginal integrity of CAD/CAM fabricated crowns adhesively cemented to titanium base abutments—Influence of bonding system and restorative material
39. A prospective clinical cohort study analyzing single-unit implant crowns after three years of loading: Introduction of a novel Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS)10.1111/clr.12955 ↗
40. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses10.1016/j.jdent.2016.10.017 ↗
41. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.016 ↗
42. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study10.1111/clr.13693 ↗
43. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I
44. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: A methodologic clinical study
45. (2015). Dentistry—Ceramic materials (Standard No. DIN EN ISO 6872:2015).