Original Locking Rod System Designed for Diaphyseal Fractures of Long Bones
Source abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Intramedullary nailing is widely used for long bone fractures. Traditional systems are reliable, but they present some complications regarding lack of modularity or possible growth plate damage. Methods: A novel locking rod–screw system featuring a central rod and a grooved screw with a secondary interlocking mechanism was developed and tested. Mechanical testing followed ASTM F543 and ISO 6475 standards using a 3.0 mm steel alloy prototype. Results: The system withstood mechanical testing >200,000 cycles at loads up to 200 N with no rates of failure or loosening, significantly outperforming other implants of the same size (3.0 mm TENS). Conclusions: The proposed implant demonstrates superior biomechanical performance in vitro, enabled by its unique hollow screw and secondary locking configuration. This modular and minimally invasive system shows promise for use in cases of smaller long bones, personalized paediatric fractures, and all types of diaphyseal fractures, but does warrant in vivo validation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone fractures and treatments · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
Department Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cork University Hospital, T12 DC4A Cork, Ireland
Veterinaria Timisoara, 300502 Timisoara, Romania
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta “Pius Brinzeu” Timisoara, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Early history of operative treatment of fractures10.1007/s00402-010-1082-7 ↗
2. Dan, P., Petreus, T., Asaftei, R., Berea, G., and Botez, P. (2011). Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Long Bone Fractures—Biomechanics—Design—Clinical Results. Biomechanics in Applications, IntechOpen Limited.10.5772/21189 ↗
3. The history of intramedullary nailing10.1007/s00264-021-04973-y ↗
4. Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Treatment of Pediatric Femoral Fractures; A 15-Year Single Centre Experience10.29252/beat-070213 ↗
5. Martínez-Aznar, C., Mateo, J., Ibarz, E., Gracia, L., Rosell, J., and Puértolas, S. (2023). Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10101179 ↗
6. Özkaya, M., and Demir, T. (2024). Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of the expandable wedge locked nail fixation in retrograde use: A finite element study. Comput. Biol. Med., 174.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108419 ↗
7. Mechanical comparison of standard interlocking, clawed, and expandable wedge locked nail fixations: An experimental and numerical study10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.002 ↗
8. Putame, G., Pascoletti, G., Terzini, M., Zanetti, E.M., and Audenino, A.L. (2020). Mechanical Behavior of Elastic Self-Locking Nails for Intramedullary Fracture Fixation: A Numerical Analysis of Innovative Nail Designs. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00557 ↗
9. Marchetti Vicenzi elastic retrograde nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: Review of the current literature10.1007/s12306-015-0387-7 ↗
10. Intramedullary nailing of the femur with an inflatable self-locking nail: Comparison with locked nailing10.1007/s00776-003-0709-8 ↗
11. Comparison of our self-designed rotary self-locking intramedullary nail and interlocking intramedullary nail in the treatment of long bone fractures10.1186/1749-799X-9-47 ↗
12. The biomechanical study of rotating-arm self-locking intramedullary nails in comminuted femoral shaft fractures
13. Kim, D.H., Jang, H.S., Kwak, S.H., Jung, S.Y., Jeon, J.M., Ahn, T.Y., and Lee, S.H. (2023). Surgical outcomes of segmental diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults: A small case series on plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary nailing, and other surgical methods. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 24.10.1186/s12891-023-06857-1 ↗
14. Saul, D., Menger, M.M., Ehnert, S., Nüssler, A.K., Histing, T., and Laschke, M.W. (2023). Bone Healing Gone Wrong: Pathological Fracture Healing and Non-Unions—Overview of Basic and Clinical Aspects and Systematic Review of Risk Factors. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10010085 ↗
15. Open Tibial Fractures10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00051 ↗
16. Fixation Failure in Osteoporotic Bone: A Review of Complications and Outcomes10.1007/s43465-024-01316-y ↗
17. The Economic Significance of Orthopaedic Infections10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00394 ↗
18. Mechanical testing of internal fixation devices: A theoretical and practical examination of current methods10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.013 ↗
19. Havaldar, R., Pilli, S.C., and Putti, B.B. (2014). Insights into the effects of tensile and compressive loadings on human femur bone. Adv. Biomed. Res., 3.10.4103/2277-9175.129375 ↗
20. Biomechanical assessment of composite versus metallic intramedullary nailing system in femoral shaft fractures: A finite element study10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.05.010 ↗
21. Evaluating the Biomechanical Efficacy of 2.5-mm and 2.0-mm Double Plating Against 3.5-mm Single Plating in Ulnar Shaft Fracture Fixation: A Cadaveric Study10.1302/1358-992X.2024.18.010 ↗
22. Fracture Fixation Strength in Metacarpal Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing Using a 3-Point Bending Model: A Cadaveri c, Biomechanical Study10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.04.020 ↗
23. A systematic review of the use of titanium versus stainless steel implants for fracture fixation10.1097/OI9.0000000000000138 ↗
24. (2024). Implants for Surgery—Metallic Materials. Part 1: Wrought Stainless Steel (Standard No. ISO 5832-1:2024).
25. (1989). Implants for Surgery—Metal Bone Screws with Asymmetrical Thread and Spherical Under-Surface—Mechanical Requirements and Test Methods (Standard No. ISO 6475:1989).
26. (2017). Axial and Torsion Testing of Metallic Medical Bone Screws (Standard No. ASTM F543).
27. Osteosynthesis with Intramedullary Nails in Children10.1590/S0102-36162009000500002 ↗
28. Differences in biomechanical stability of femur fracture fixation when using titanium nails of increasing diameter10.1007/s11832-007-0040-6 ↗
29. Intramedullary Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures Using Headless Compression Screws10.1055/s-0036-1593390 ↗
30. Headless Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Neck Fractures: A Mechanical Comparative Analysis10.1177/1558944717731859 ↗
31. Bone Response To Stainless Steel And Titanium Bone Plates10.1016/S0377-1237(17)31029-8 ↗
32. Ladani, L., and Palmieri, M. (2024). Review of the Use of Metals in Biomedical Applications: Biocompatibility, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, and Standards and Regulations. Metals, 14.10.3390/met14091039 ↗
33. Holt, J.M., Mindlin, H., and Ho, C.Y. (1997). Structural Alloys Handbook, CINDAS/Purdue University.
34. Daood, K. (2025, February 02). Mechanics of Materials by B. J. 7th. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/35205827/Mechanics_of_Materials_By_B_J_7th.
35. Comparison of a 2.7-mm and 3.5-mm locking compression plate for ulnar fractures: A biomechanical evaluation10.1097/OI9.0000000000000278 ↗
36. Influence of intramedullary nail diameter and locking mode on the stability of tibial shaft fracture fixation10.1007/s00402-008-0700-0 ↗
37. Mechanical study of the safe distance between distal femoral fracture site and distal locking screws in antegrade intramedullary nailing10.1097/01.bot.0000184140.44707.a2 ↗
38. Outcome Analysis of Intramedullary Nailing Augmented with Poller Screws for Treating Difficult Reduction Fractures of Femur and Tibia: A Retrospective Cohort Study
39. Variation of Mid shaft Antero-posterior and Transverse Diameter of Femur in Bangladeshi People
40. An Anthropometric Study of the Humerus in Adults
41. Reduction with Pre-Drilling Combined with a Finger Reduction Tool in Difficult-to-Reduce Intertrochanteric Fracture10.1111/os.13447 ↗
42. (2016). Standard Specification and Test Methods for Intramedullary Fixation Devices (Standard No. ASTM F1264-16e1).