Adhesion and Colonization Intensity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on Smooth, Micro-Textured, and Macro-Textured Silicone Biomaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Implantable biomaterials are widely used in modern medicine, especially in orthopaedics, cardiovascular surgery, dentistry, and plastic and reconstructive surgery. The issue of the interaction of implants with body tissues and the risk of infection associated with them is one of the most studied and topical issues in medicine. It is very important to find a biomaterial that effectively combines both microbiology and tissue compatibility aspects. The aim of this research work was to determine the adhesion and colonization rates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on smooth, microtextured, and macro-textured silicone biomaterials in an in vitro study. A total of 90 silicone biomaterial samples were used, 30 for each type of biomaterial. In each of the biomaterial groups, half of the samples (n = 15) were used to determine the adhesion intensity and the other half to determine the colonization intensity on the active surface of the biomaterial samples. The study found that Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had the highest adhesion intensity on the macro-textured implant, while Candida albicans adhered best to smooth. Among the microorganisms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated the highest colonization rate, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis and then Candida albicans. The most intensive colonization of microorganisms was on the macro-textured implant, then on the micro-textured, and then on the smooth. The smooth and micro-textured implants did not show statistically significant differences in the intensity of adhesion and colonization. The biomaterials did not show pro-oxidant or anti-oxidant properties, and no lipid peroxidation was induced by the biomaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Doctoral Studies, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia
Department of Biology and Microbiology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia
Department of Human Physiology and Biochemistry, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1007 Riga, Latvia
Scientific Laboratory of Biochemistry, Riga Stradiņš University, LV1067 Riga, Latvia
Clinic of Aesthetic Medicine of Medical Doctor Edward Yurshevich, LV1010 Riga, Latvia
Funding
Riga Stradiņš University
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterials: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140027 ↗
2. Implants and Biomaterials
3. Pecquet Goad, M.E., and Goad, D.L. (2013). Biomedical Materials and Devices. Hachek and Rousseaux’s Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology, Elsevier. [3rd ed.]. Chapter 26.10.1016/B978-0-12-415759-0.00026-1 ↗
4. The Toronto Plastic Surgeons (2025, June 02). Breast Augmentation (Implants) Statistics 2023. Available online: https://torontoplasticsurgeon.com/blog/breast-augmentation-implants-statistics-2023.
5. ISAPS (2025, June 02). Global Survey 2023. Full Report and Press Release in English., Available online: https://www.isaps.org/media/rxnfqibn/isaps-global-survey_2023.pdf.
6. Histological Characterization of Human Breast Implant Capsules10.1007/s00266-014-0439-7 ↗
7. Breast-implant texturing associated with delamination of capsular layers: A histological analysis of the double capsule phenomenon10.1016/j.anplas.2017.02.001 ↗
8. A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants10.1097/00006534-199290020-00012 ↗
9. Capsular Biofilm Formation at the Interface of Textured Expanders and Human Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopy Study10.1097/PRS.0000000000004216 ↗
10. Textured Silicone Breast Implant Use in Primary Augmentation10.1097/PRS.0000000000000832 ↗
11. Breast implant surface texture impacts host tissue response10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.035 ↗
12. Textured Breast Implants: A Closer Look at the Surface Debris Under the Microscope10.1177/2292550317716127 ↗
13. Advanced biopolymer-coated drug-releasing titania nanotubes (TNTs) implants with simultaneously enhanced osteoblast adhesion and antibacterial properties10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.021 ↗
14. Prosthesis infections after orthopedic joint replacement: The possible role of bacterial biofilms
15. Yoda, I., Koseki, H., Tomita, M., Shida, T., Horiuchi, H., Sakoda, H., and Osaki, M. (2014). Effect of surface roughness of biomaterials on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion. BMC Microbiol., 14.10.1186/s12866-014-0234-2 ↗
16. Breast Implant Infections: An Update10.1016/j.idc.2018.06.007 ↗
17. The microbial epidemiology of breast implant infections in a regional referral centre for plastic and reconstructive surgery in the south of France10.1016/j.ijid.2015.04.010 ↗
18. Breast Implant Infections10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.003 ↗
19. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Breast Implant Infections10.1097/01.prs.0000244924.61968.d2 ↗
20. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections on implants10.1016/j.jhin.2017.11.008 ↗
21. Pathogenesis of Foreign Body Infection: Description and Characteristics of an Animal Model10.1093/infdis/146.4.487 ↗
22. Pathogenesis of foreign body infection. Evidence for a local granulocyte defect10.1172/JCI111305 ↗
23. Shaped versus Round Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes10.1097/PRS.0000000000003238 ↗
24. Breast Implant Surfaces and Their Impact on Current Practices: Where We Are Now and Where Are We Going?10.1097/GOX.0000000000002466 ↗
25. Effect of Breast Silicone Implant Topography on Bacterial Attachment and Growth: An In Vitro Study10.21873/invivo.12882 ↗
26. In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation of the Influence of Implant Surface on the Formation of Bacterial Biofilm in Mammary Implants10.1097/PRS.0000000000000020 ↗
27. Schoberleitner, I., Baier, L., Lackner, M., Zenz, L.-M., Coraça-Huber, D.C., Ullmer, W., Damerum, A., Faserl, K., Sigl, S., and Steinkellner, T. (2024). Surface Topography, Microbial Adhesion, and Immune Responses in Silicone Mammary Implant-Associated Capsular Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.20944/preprints202401.2166.v1 ↗
28. An Impact of Different Silicone Breast Implants on the Bacterial Attachment and Growth10.4236/jbnb.2021.123003 ↗
29. Microtexture and the Cell/Biomaterial Interface: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Capsular Contracture and Prosthetic Breast Implants10.1093/asj/sjy178 ↗
30. The Relationship of Bacterial Biofilms and Capsular Contracture in Breast Implants10.1093/asj/sjv177 ↗
31. Jurševičs, K., Jurševičs, E., Krasiļņikova, J., Šķesters, A., Lece, A., and Skadiņš, I. (2024). Antioxidant Status in Patients after Breast Mastopexy and Augmentation. Medicina, 60.10.3390/medicina60071046 ↗