Tomographic Assessment of Bone Regeneration in Osteochondral Lesion Treated with Various Biomaterials in a Sheep Model Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Osteochondral defects, involving both articular cartilage and subchondral bone, pose significant challenges to joint function and health due to the lack of spontaneous healing and the risk of long-term degenerative diseases like osteoarthritis. Biomaterials have emerged as important components in the development of scaffolds, providing structural support that facilitates tissue growth, integration, and regeneration. This study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of a tomographic assessment method for optimizing the evaluation of osteochondral regeneration, particularly using Hounsfield units, to enable the evaluation of scaffold integration and tissue regeneration. The sheep model was selected as a model study. Two distinct configurations of biomaterials were utilized in this study: Honey (HMG—Mg doped hydroxyapatite; HWS—wollastonite–hydroxyapatite) and Bi-layer (BWS—wollastonite–hydroxyapatite). The HMG scaffold demonstrated superior integration, reparative tissue quality, and regeneration potential compared to the HWS, BWS, and CTRL groups. The findings underscore the significance of CT assessment as a preliminary method for evaluating hard tissue, such as bone, employing Hounsfield units. Statistical evaluations validated the significant differences in performance, particularly favoring the HMG group. The results of this study underscore the importance of tomographic assessment in evaluation of osteochondral regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Foot and Ankle Surgery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari “ALDO MORO”, 70010 Bari, Italy
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Agricultural University of Tirana, 1025 Tirana, Albania
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Material-Assisted Strategies for Osteochondral Defect Repair10.1002/advs.202200050 ↗
2. Biomechanical Influence of Cartilage Homeostasis in Health and Disease10.1155/2011/979032 ↗
3. Crovace, A.M., Giancamillo, A.D., Gervaso, F., Mangiavini, L., Zani, D., Scalera, F., Palazzo, B., Izzo, D., Agnoletto, M., and Domenicucci, M. (2019). Evaluation of in Vivo Response of Three Biphasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration in a Sheep Model. Vet. Sci., 6.10.3390/vetsci6040090 ↗
4. Jacob, G., Shimomura, K., and Nakamura, N. (2020). Osteochondral Injury, Management and Tissue Engineering Approaches. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 8.10.3389/fcell.2020.580868 ↗
5. Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for Osteochondral Defects of the Talar Dome10.1016/S1083-7515(02)00064-5 ↗
6. A Scaffold-Free Allogeneic Construct from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Regenerates an Osteochondral Defect in a Rabbit Model10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.033 ↗
7. Regeneration of the Osteochondral Defect by a Wollastonite and Macroporous Fibrin Biphasic Scaffold10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00333 ↗
8. Multilayered Scaffold with a Compact Interfacial Layer Enhances Osteochondral Defect Repair10.1021/acsami.8b03445 ↗
9. Applications of Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine10.15761/JSCRM.1000132 ↗
10. ECM and ECM-like Materials—Biomaterials for Applications in Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Therapy10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.019 ↗
11. Strategic Design and Fabrication of Engineered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair10.3390/jfb3040799 ↗
12. Animal Models for Cartilage Repair
13. Longley, R., Ferreira, A.M., and Gentile, P. (2018). Recent Approaches to the Manufacturing of Biomimetic Multi-Phasic Scaffolds for Osteochondral Regeneration. IJMS, 19.10.3390/ijms19061755 ↗
14. Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair10.1007/978-3-319-76735-2_16 ↗
15. Recent Strategies in Osteochondral Substitutes Design: Towards the Mimicking of a Multifaceted Anatomical Unit from the Nano to the Macro Level
16. Osteochondral Lesions of the Knee: Differentiating the Most Common Entities at MRI10.1148/rg.2018180044 ↗
17. Computed Medical Imaging10.1097/00004728-198010000-00017 ↗
18. Effective Use of the Hounsfield Unit in the Age of Variable Energy CT10.1007/s00261-017-1052-4 ↗
19. Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT
20. Banstola, A., and Reynolds, J.N.J. (2022). The Sheep as a Large Animal Model for the Investigation and Treatment of Human Disorders. Biology, 11.10.3390/biology11091251 ↗
21. The Sheep as a Model of Preclinical Safety and Pharmacokinetic Evaluations of Candidate Microbicides10.1128/AAC.04954-14 ↗
22. Cartilage and Diarthrodial Joints as Paradigms for Hierarchical Materials and Structures10.1016/0142-9612(92)90001-5 ↗
23. Mechanical Performance and In Vitro Studies of Hydroxyapatite/Wollastonite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.493-494.855 ↗
24. High-Performance Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications10.1111/j.1744-7402.2011.02662.x ↗
25. Mechanical Stability of Highly Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds during Different Stages of in Vitro Studies10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.139 ↗
26. Influence of the Precipitation Temperature on Properties of Nanohydroxyapatite Powder for the Fabrication of Highly Porous Bone Scaffolds10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.587.27 ↗
27. Influence of the Calcination Temperature on Morphological and Mechanical Properties of Highly Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.076 ↗
28. Osteochondral Repair by a Novel Interconnecting Collagen–Hydroxyapatite Substitute: A Large-Animal Study10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0129 ↗
29. Collagen Scaffold for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: The Benefit of Fibrin Glue and the Proper Culture Time in an Infant Cartilage Model10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0171 ↗
30. Biomechanical Evaluation of hMSCs-Based Engineered Cartilage for Chondral Tissue Regeneration10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.040 ↗
31. Comparison of Three Novel Biphasic Scaffolds for One-Stage Treatment of Osteochondral Defects in a Sheep Model
32. The Influence Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticle Shape and Size on the Properties of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds Coated with Hydroxyapatite–PCL Composites10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.058 ↗
33. A Study on Improving Mechanical Properties of Porous HA Tissue Engineering Scaffolds by Hot Isostatic Pressing10.1088/1748-6041/1/4/002 ↗
34. Physical Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.052 ↗
35. Mechanical and Biological Properties of Hydroxyapatite/Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds Coated with Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid)10.1016/j.actbio.2007.10.006 ↗
36. Influence of Sedation on Onset and Quality of Euthanasia in Sheep10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.11.012 ↗
37. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 ↗
38. Corder, G.W., and Foreman, D.I. (2009). Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach, Wiley.10.1002/9781118165881 ↗
39. Strategies for Osteochondral Repair: Focus on Scaffolds10.1177/2041731414541850 ↗
40. Resurfacing of Goat Articular Cartilage by Chondrocytes Derived from Bone Marrow10.1097/00003086-199609000-00031 ↗
41. Biochemical and Biomechanical Properties of Lesion and Adjacent Articular Cartilage after Chondral Defect Repair in an Equine Model10.1177/0363546505275487 ↗
42. Zhou, L., Ho, K.-W.K., Zheng, L., Xu, J., Chen, Z., Ye, X., Zou, L., Li, Y., Chang, L., and Shao, H. (2024). A Rabbit Osteochondral Defect (OCD) Model for Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Implants on Their Biosafety and Efficacy in Osteochondral Repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1352023 ↗