Show source-provided references
1. Papini, M., Zdero, R., Schemitsch, E.H., and Zalzal, P. (2007). The Biomechanics of Human Femurs in Axial and Torsional Loading: Comparison of Finite Element Analysis, Human Cadaveric Femurs, and Synthetic Femurs. J. Biomech. Eng., 129.
10.1115/1.2401178 ↗3. Fractures attributable to osteoporosis:b Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation Journal of bone and mineral research
10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.16 ↗4. Características de las fracturas de cadera: A propósito del análisis de historias clínicas en tres hospitales universitarios colombianos
9. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: The study of osteoporotic fractures
10.1002/jbmr.5650081008 ↗13. Tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas de cadera
15. Rüedi, T.P., and Murphy, W.M. (2007). AO Principles of Fracture Management, Davos Platz [Switzerland]: Thieme; AO Pub.
17. Úlceras por presión en el postoperatorio de intervenciones quirúrgicas de cadera o de rodilla
19. Short-duration prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: A meta-analysis of prospective studies investigating symptomatic outcomes
10.1001/archinte.162.13.1465 ↗20. Fracturas periprotésicas de cadera
23. Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: Implications for osteoporotic fractures
10.1007/BF01774015 ↗24. Finite Element analysis of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture
25. Yadav, D., and Garg, R.K. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Behavior of Femur Bone of Different Age and Sex Using FEA. En Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Technology: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Advanced Production and Industrial Engineering (ICAPIE)-2021, Springer.
10.1007/978-981-16-9613-8_3 ↗27. Primary total knee arthroplasty in super-obese patients: Dramatically higher postoperative complication rates even compared to revision surgery
10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.016 ↗28. Calcium phosphate coatings elaborated by the soaking process on titanium dental implants: Surface preparation, processing and physical–chemical characterization
10.1016/j.dental.2018.10.005 ↗29. Jansen, J. (2009). Thin Calcium Phosphate Coatings for Medical Implants, Springer.
30. Bohara, S., and Suthakorn, J. (2022). Surface coating of orthopedic implant to enhance the osseointegration and reduction of antibacterial colonization: A review. Biomater. Res., 26.
10.1186/s40824-022-00269-3 ↗31. Vogel, D., Wehmeyer, M., Kebbach, M., Heyer, H., and Bader, R. (2021). Stress and strain distribution in femoral heads for hip resurfacing arthroplasty with different materials: A finite element analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 113.
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104115 ↗32. Filip, N., Radu, I., Veliceasa, B., Filip, C., Pertea, M., Clim, A., Pinzau, A.C., Drochioi, I.C., Hilitanu, R.L., and Serban, I.L. (2022). Biomaterials in Orthopedic Devices: Current Issues and Future Perspectives. Coatings, 12.
10.3390/coatings12101544 ↗33. The biomechanical profile of an osseointegrated rectangular block implant: A pilot in vivo experimental study
10.1111/clr.13834 ↗34. Estimation of Porosity Effect on Mechanical Properties in Calcium Phosphate Cement Reinforced by Strontium Nitrate Nanoparticles: Fabrication and FEM Analysis
10.1007/s13369-023-08050-x ↗35. Auciello, O., Renou, S., Kang, K., Tasat, D., and Olmedo, D. (2022). A Biocompatible Ultrananocrystalline Diamond (UNCD) Coating for a New Generation of Dental Implants. Nanomaterials, 12.
10.3390/nano12050782 ↗36. Isaza, E., García, L., and Salazar, E. (2013, January 9–11). Determination of Mechanic Resistance of Osseous Element through Finite Element Modeling. Proceedings of the 2013 COMSOL Conference, Boston, MA, USA. Available online: https://grabcad.com/library/femur--1.
38. Sadeghi, R., Bakhtiari-Nejad, F., and Goudarzi, T. (2018, January 26–29). Vibrational Analysis of Human Femur Bone. Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Quebec City, QC, Canada. V008T10A045.
41. Resnik, M., Benčina, M., Levičnik, E., Rawat, N., Iglič, A., and Junkar, I. (2020). Strategies for improving antimicrobial properties of stainless steel. Materials, 13.
10.3390/ma13132944 ↗42. Mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthopedic one-third tubular plates and cortical screws
10.2217/3dp-2022-0007 ↗44. Bharadwaj, A. (2021). An overview on biomaterials and its applications in medical science. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing.
10.1088/1757-899X/1116/1/012178 ↗45. Al-Shalawi, F.D., Mohamed Ariff, A.H., Jung, D.W., Mohd Ariffin MK, A., Seng Kim, C.L., Brabazon, D., and Al-Osaimi, M.O. (2023). Biomaterials as implants in the orthopedic field for regenerative medicine: Metal versus synthetic polymers. Polymers, 15.
10.3390/polym15122601 ↗46. Emerging magnesium-based biomaterials for orthopedic implantation
47. Ansys Library (2024, September 22). Engineering Data. Section Analysis Systems: Static Structural. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/materials/materials-data-for-simulation.
48. Pérez-Cano, F.D., Jiménez-Pérez, J.R., Molina-Viedma, A.J., López-Alba, E., Luque-Luque, A., Delgado-Martínez, A., Díaz-Garrido, F.A., and Jiménez-Delgado, J.J. (2023). Human femur fracture by mechanical compression: Towards the repeatability of bone fracture acquisition. Comput. Biol. Med., 164.
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107249 ↗49. Amini, M., Reisinger, A., Hirtler, L., and Pahr, D. (2021). Which experimental procedures influence the apparent proximal femoral stiffness? A parametric study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 22.
10.1186/s12891-021-04656-0 ↗50. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: Finite element analysis of the femoral component
10.1054/arth.2000.1359 ↗