journal article·2021-05

Solution‐Processed Copper‐Doped Chromium Oxide with Tunable Oxygen Vacancy for Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells Hole‐Selective Contacts

Zhiyuan Xu, Shanglong Peng, Hao Lin, Shuhao Tian, Zilei Wang, Jian He, Lun Cai, Juan Hou, Pingqi Gao

Solar RRL· Volume 5· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Compared with vacuum evaporation, metal oxides deposited by solution process exhibit advantages, for example, dopants can be easily incorporated in a wide range and the contents are easy to be regulated by changing the composition of precursors. Herein, solution‐processed p‐type copper‐doped chromium oxide (Cu:CrOx) films with tunable oxygen vacancy are demonstrated via a postannealing process. The synthetic and postannealing temperature have a significant impact on the chromium cation oxidation state in the Cu:CrOx films, leading to the variation of work function for the oxide films. By adjusting the work function of Cu:CrOx films, a low contact resistivity of 95 mΩ cm2 can be realized for the Ag/Cu:CrOx/p‐Si contact. Finally, the optimized Cu:CrOx films are used as the hole transporting layer in c‐Si solar cells, showing an increased power conversion efficiency from 15.2% (without Cu:CrOx) to 16.9% (with Cu:CrOx). The results show an effective stage to use p‐type metal oxides as a hole‐selective layer in c‐Si solar cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Semiconductor materials and devices · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physical Science and Technology Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000 China

School of Materials Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou 510275 China

College of Science/Key Laboratory of Ecophysics Department of Physics Shihezi University Shihezi 832003 Xinjiang China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.490346710.1063/1.4903467 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.03.03210.1016/j.materresbull.2018.03.032 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20120061510.1002/adfm.201200615 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.02.01310.1016/j.tsf.2011.02.013 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.7b1368010.1021/acsami.7b13680 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10411610.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104116 ↗
7. 10.1002/advs.20170054710.1002/advs.201700547 ↗
8. Battaglia C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104
9. 10.1002/adfm.20200436710.1002/adfm.202004367 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.0c0987710.1021/acsami.0c09877 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7TA01959A10.1039/C7TA01959A ↗
12. 10.1002/aelm.20200046710.1002/aelm.202000467 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.04210.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.042 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b1288610.1021/acsami.7b12886 ↗
15. Wan Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 1601863
16. Tong H. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 8 · 1702921
17. 10.1002/pssr.20160025410.1002/pssr.201600254 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0287810.1021/acsami.8b02878 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20180336710.1002/aenm.201803367 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10393010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103930 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.04310.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.043 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20160024110.1002/aenm.201600241 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20200555410.1002/adfm.202005554 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.010 ↗
25. 10.1021/am503949g10.1021/am503949g ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20140038010.1002/adfm.201400380 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep1209310.1038/srep12093 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.03710.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.037 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20160632110.1002/adma.201606321 ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20170449310.1002/smll.201704493 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12177910.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121779 ↗
32. 10.1002/admi.20150079910.1002/admi.201500799 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.03110.1016/j.solmat.2015.05.031 ↗
34. 10.1002/solr.20170022710.1002/solr.201700227 ↗
35. 10.1002/solr.20170024510.1002/solr.201700245 ↗