Detailed Bias‐Dependent Free Energy Loss Analysis for Proposing Device Optimization Strategies in Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell Design
Source abstract
Abstract
A multiscale electro‐optical device model is employed to investigate free energy and other losses in a silicon heterojunction (SHJ) solar cell. A finite element method‐based device model is coupled with free energy loss analysis (FELA) to calculate detailed bias voltage‐dependent losses in terms of and . Such an approach provides insight into identifying possible pathways for synergetic optimization and redesigning a solar cell device in both laboratory and mass production settings. The SHJ solar cell investigated in this work demonstrates that the hole‐selective contact (HSC) is responsible for a significant portion of the free energy loss. At maximum power point, a power density of ~1.6 mWcm −2 at 1 sun is lost associated with carrier transport in HSC and recombination at both selective contacts. This results in a 1.6% absolute loss in power conversion efficiency (PCE). Auger recombination in the wafer limits the open‐circuit voltage. The FELA suggests a pathway for synergistic optimization of the device to regain a significant portion of the ~2.6% absolute loss in PCE. Simultaneously adjusting the conductivity of a‐Si layers in HSC and the concentration of free majority carriers in the wafer can improve the fill factor (FF) to ~87% and PCE close to 26%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany
IMD‐3 Photovoltaics Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Jülich Germany
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Gueymard C. · 1995
2. A Route towards High‐Efficiency Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells
3. Würfel P. · 2016
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41560-023-01255-210.1038/s41560-023-01255-2 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.adf587210.1126/science.adf5872 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41586-023-06667-410.1038/s41586-023-06667-4 ↗
8. Brendel R. · 2008
9. 10.1063/1.300605310.1063/1.3006053 ↗
10. 10.1002/solr.20220105110.1002/solr.202201051 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.00910.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/B978-0-08-054721-3.50037-X10.1016/B978-0-08-054721-3.50037-X ↗
13. 2015
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.16520210.1103/PhysRevB.86.165202 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.486929510.1063/1.4869295 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.152929710.1063/1.1529297 ↗
17. 10.1016/0038-1101(92)90325-710.1016/0038-1101(92)90325-7 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.10955810.1063/1.109558 ↗
19. 10.1002/pip.330010.1002/pip.3300 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7RA04018K10.1039/C7RA04018K ↗
21. L. Z.Peng “Design Fabrication and Characterization of Thin‐Film Materials for Heterojunction Silicon Wafer Solar Cells” (Dissertation National University of Singapore 2014).
22. 10.1063/1.332694510.1063/1.3326945 ↗
23. 10.3390/en1311294810.3390/en13112948 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10825-014-0583-y10.1007/s10825-014-0583-y ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.02910.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.029 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.483277710.1063/1.4832777 ↗
27. Sze S. M. · 2013
28. 10.1063/1.488659510.1063/1.4886595 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssr.20130708010.1002/pssr.201307080 ↗
30. 10.1002/pip.269610.1002/pip.2696 ↗
31. G.MicardandG.Hahn eds. in Free Energy Loss Analysis Decomposition of the Power Voltage Characteristic of an Interdigitated Back Contact Solar Cell 5 pages / 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition (WIP 2014) 1267–1271.
32. 10.1038/nmat326310.1038/nmat3263 ↗
33. Z. R.Abrams “Thermodynamics Entropy Information and the Efficiency of Solar Cells” (Doctor of Philosophy University of California 2012).
34. 10.1063/1.32349410.1063/1.323494 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14874910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148749 ↗
36. 10.1143/JJAP.31.351810.1143/JJAP.31.3518 ↗
37. D.Pysch M.Bivour K.Zimmermann C.Schetter M.Hermle andS. W.Glunz in Comprehensive Study of Different PECVD‐Deposition Methods for Deposition of Thin Intrinsic Amorphous Silicon for Heterojunction Solar Cells 6 pages /24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference Hamburg Germany 21–25 September2009 1580–1585.
38. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.08710.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.087 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.11350410.1016/j.solmat.2025.113504 ↗
40. 10.1002/solr.20240038310.1002/solr.202400383 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.03810.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.038 ↗
42. Comparison of Free Energy Loss Analysis and Synergistic Efficiency Gain Analysis for PERC Solar Cells
43. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227035110.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270351 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41560-021-00805-w10.1038/s41560-021-00805-w ↗