Controlling Fatigue Cracks in the Transmission Electron Microscope
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fatigue cracking in materials is a widespread engineering challenge with substantial economic and safety consequences. In situ Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is an emerging method to investigate the nanoscale origins of fatigue. Recent nanoindenter‐based methods enabled detailed observation of crack propagation in the TEM, yet these experiments remain difficult to control. Here, a novel control methodology adopted from linear elastic fracture mechanics employs a stress intensity factor K to quantify the driving force acting on propagating fatigue cracks in the TEM. This present method, demonstrated here on nanocrystalline Pt alloys, provides a quantitative basis to compare response of different materials. Controlling crack growth over many micrometers for in situ TEM fatigue experiments also unlocks an ability to observe nanoscale damage mechanisms including crack blunting, closure, deflection, branching, healing, and fatigue‐induced grain growth. Such an approach is readily extensible to investigate the nanoscale origins of cyclic degradation in both bulk structural materials and in functional nanotechnology applications such as micro‐/nano‐electronic components, MEMS (micro‐electro‐mechanical systems) devices, flexible electronics, and thin film applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM 87123 USA
Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque NM 87123 USA
Department of Nuclear Engineering University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 37996 USA
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/1478643590824326810.1080/14786435908243268 ↗
2. 10.1080/1478643590823826610.1080/14786435908238266 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478643650822396710.1080/14786436508223967 ↗
4. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90265-310.1016/0001-6160(66)90265-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/0026-0800(85)90056-410.1016/0026-0800(85)90056-4 ↗
6. 10.1080/0141861870821439110.1080/01418618708214391 ↗
7. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90093-V10.1016/0956-7151(90)90093-V ↗
8. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90269-910.1016/0921-5093(90)90269-9 ↗
9. 10.1002/jemt.106017030910.1002/jemt.1060170309 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.148176810.1063/1.1481768 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl403426c10.1021/nl403426c ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10033710.1016/j.mtla.2019.100337 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.355319510.1063/1.3553195 ↗
14. 10.1039/C3NR04035F10.1039/C3NR04035F ↗
15. 10.1557/mrs.2019.12310.1557/mrs.2019.123 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.132023511010.1073/pnas.1320235110 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms586410.1038/ncomms5864 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0156010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01560 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11837-019-03361-710.1007/s11837-019-03361-7 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41586-023-06223-010.1038/s41586-023-06223-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11012-014-9896-y10.1007/s11012-014-9896-y ↗
22. ASTM E399 – 20a 03.01 Standard Test Method for Linear‐Elastic Plane‐Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials 2022 38.
23. 10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04073-810.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04073-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/0025-5416(86)90217-X10.1016/0025-5416(86)90217-X ↗
25. 10.1557/s43578-021-00167-910.1557/s43578-021-00167-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.04110.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.041 ↗
27. 10.1115/1.80153510.1115/1.801535 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11340-009-9301-210.1007/s11340-009-9301-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.10106610.1016/j.xpro.2021.101066 ↗
30. 10.1179/imr.1984.29.1.44510.1179/imr.1984.29.1.445 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.05.01410.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.05.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.04710.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.047 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11661-007-9147-010.1007/s11661-007-9147-0 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14296910.1016/j.msea.2022.142969 ↗
35. 10.3390/cryst1209121110.3390/cryst12091211 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11661-011-0708-x10.1007/s11661-011-0708-x ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-016-0437-z10.1007/s10853-016-0437-z ↗
38. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/15/15540210.1088/0953-8984/25/15/155402 ↗
39. 10.1038/s43246-025-00752-z10.1038/s43246-025-00752-z ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.002 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.05510.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.055 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.tsf.2024.14030410.1016/j.tsf.2024.140304 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1710236510.3390/ma17102365 ↗
44. M. R.Douglass in1998 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 36th Annual (Cat. No. 98CH36173) IEEE Reno NV USA1998 pp.9–16.10.1109/RELPHY.1998.670436 ↗
45. X.Xiong Y. L.Wu W. B.Jone in2008 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance of VLSI Systems IEEE Boston MA USA2008 pp.314–322.10.1109/DFT.2008.37 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13391-018-0043-010.1007/s13391-018-0043-0 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.180926010.1063/1.1809260 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.00310.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.003 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.02510.1016/j.jmst.2021.02.025 ↗