journal article·2015-10Open access

Electrostatic Limit of Detection of Nanowire‐Based Sensors

Alex Henning, Michel Molotskii, Nandhini Swaminathan, Yonathan Vaknin, Andrey Godkin, Gil Shalev, Yossi Rosenwaks

Small· Volume 11· Issue 37

Abstract

Scanning gate microscopy is used to determine the electrostatic limit of detection (LOD) of a nanowire (NW) based chemical sensor with a precision of sub‐elementary charge. The presented method is validated with an electrostatically formed NW whose active area and shape are tunable by biasing a multiple gate field‐effect transistor (FET). By using the tip of an atomic force microscope (AFM) as a local top gate, the field effect of adsorbed molecules is emulated. The tip induced charge is quantified with an analytical electrostatic model and it is shown that the NW sensor is sensitive to about an elementary charge and that the measurements with the AFM tip are in agreement with sensing of ethanol vapor. This method is applicable to any FET‐based chemical and biological sensor, provides a means to predict the absolute sensor performance limit, and suggests a standardized way to compare LODs and sensitivities of various sensors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physical Electronics School of Electrical Engineering Tel‐Aviv University Ramat‐Aviv 69978 Israel

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.106271110.1126/science.1062711 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl048928310.1021/nl0489283 ↗
3. 10.1038/nbt113810.1038/nbt1138 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat189110.1038/nmat1891 ↗
5. 10.1002/ange.20100084710.1002/ange.201000847 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20100084710.1002/anie.201000847 ↗
7. 10.3390/s14010024510.3390/s140100245 ↗
8. 10.1021/nn201184c10.1021/nn201184c ↗
9. 10.1021/nn203653h10.1021/nn203653h ↗
10. 10.1021/am400464910.1021/am4004649 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl404335p10.1021/nl404335p ↗
12. 10.3390/s14081399910.3390/s140813999 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.287.5453.62210.1126/science.287.5453.622 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.287.5459.180110.1126/science.287.5459.1801 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl034220x10.1021/nl034220x ↗
16. 10.1038/am.2012.7510.1038/am.2012.75 ↗
17. 10.1002/wnan.123510.1002/wnan.1235 ↗
18. 10.1021/ac50064a00410.1021/ac50064a004 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00105-110.1016/S0003-2670(99)00105-1 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.221131010.1063/1.2211310 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.134580510.1063/1.1345805 ↗
22. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/29570510.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295705 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.608210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.6082 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.21680110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.216801 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.106992310.1126/science.1069923 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.274642210.1063/1.2746422 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.21680710.1103/PhysRevLett.107.216807 ↗
28. 10.1007/s12274‐015‐0729‐710.1007/s12274‐015‐0729‐7 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.320788710.1063/1.3207887 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.10522710.1063/1.105227 ↗
31. Glatzel T. · 2011 · 13
32. 10.1016/0038-1101(93)90217-E10.1016/0038-1101(93)90217-E ↗
33. 10.1021/jp02737210.1021/jp027372 ↗
34. 10.1119/1.1150110.1119/1.11501 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10051005021910.1007/s100510050219 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.37150610.1063/1.371506 ↗
37. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/29/29570210.1088/0957-4484/24/29/295702 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.266910.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2669 ↗
39. 10.1116/1.58518810.1116/1.585188 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.00710.1016/j.snb.2014.12.007 ↗
41. 10.1016/0038-1101(65)90046-810.1016/0038-1101(65)90046-8 ↗
42. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/2/00410.1088/0957-4484/15/2/004 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.26610110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.266101 ↗
44. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/22/22550510.1088/0957-4484/18/22/225505 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.11378010.1063/1.113780 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01484-810.1016/S0169-4332(02)01484-8 ↗