journal article·2022-02

Performance Enhancement and Signal Distortion Analysis of Virtually Doped Nanotube Tunnel FET with Embedded Ferroelectric Gate Oxide

Ashok Kumar Gupta, Ashish Raman

Silicon· Volume 14· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the effect of ferroelectric gate oxide on the electrostatic doped nanotube tunnel field-effect transistor (FE-ED-NTTFET). The proposed device is a dopingless device, and the electrostatic doped method is used for the operation of the device. For electrostatic doped operation, the operating source voltage (VS) for the proposed device is −1.2 V. The intrinsic doping is used throughout the device. The thin ferroelectric material with a width of 2 nm is used as the gate oxide, to improve the performance of the proposed FE-ED-NTTFET device. For the detailed investigation of the proposed FE-ED-NTTFET device, the following parameters are taken into consideration such as device parameters, analogue parameters, and linearity parameters. In device parameters, energy band diagram, quasi Fermi-level of electron and hole, electron/hole mobility, electric filed, non-local tunneling (BTBT), and hole/electron concentration are taken into consideration. In analogue parameters ON current, OFF current, ION/IOFF current ratio, threshold voltage, and sub-threshold swings are considered. For small-signal analysis linearity parameters such as TGF, cut-off frequencies, HD2, HD3, VIP2, VIP3, IIP3, and IMD3 have been discussed. The proposed FE-ED-NTTFET device shows the higher ON current (ION) 6.24uA, lower OFF current (IOFF) order of 10−17 A, higher ION/IOFF current ratio 1*1012, and better sub-threshold swing (SS) 12 mV/decade for gate voltage (VGS) 1.2 V.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Li H, Jagannathan B, Wang J, Su TC, Sweeney S, Pekarik JJ, Shi Y, Greenberg D, Jin Z, Groves R, Wagner L (2007, June) Technology scaling and device design for 350 GHz RF performance in a 45nm bulk CMOS process. In 2007 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology (pp. 56-57). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLSIT.2007.433972510.1109/VLSIT.2007.4339725 ↗
2. Reisman A (1983) Device, circuit, and technology scaling to micron and submicron dimensions. Proc IEEE 71(5):550–565. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1983.1263810.1109/PROC.1983.12638 ↗
3. Frank DJ, Dennard RH, Nowak E, Solomon PM, Taur Y, Wong HSP (2001) Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies. Proc IEEE 89(3):259–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.91537410.1109/5.915374 ↗
4. Yan R-H, Ourmazd A, Lee KF (Jul. 1992) Scaling the Si MOSFET: from bulk to SOI to bulk. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 39(7):1704–1710. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.14123710.1109/16.141237 ↗
5. Schaller RR (Jul. 1997) Moore’s law: past, present and future. IEEE Spectr 34(6):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/6.59166510.1109/6.591665 ↗
6. Pearce CW, Yaney DS (1985) Short-channel effects in MOSFET's. IEEE electron device letters 6(7):326–328. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDL.1985.2614310.1109/EDL.1985.26143 ↗
7. Kim NS, Austin T, Baauw D, Mudge T, Flautner K, Hu JS, Irwin MJ, Kandemir M, Narayanan V (2003) Leakage current: Moore's law meets static power. Computer 36(12):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.125088510.1109/MC.2003.1250885 ↗
8. Roy K, Mukhopadhyay S, Mahmoodi-Meimand H (2003) Leakage current mechanisms and leakage reduction techniques in deep-submicrometer CMOS circuits. Proc IEEE 91(2):305–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2002.80815610.1109/JPROC.2002.808156 ↗
9. Chan TY, Chen J, Ko PK, Hu C (1987, December) The impact of gate-induced drain leakage current on MOSFET scaling. In 1987 International Electron Devices Meeting (pp. 718-721). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.1987.19153110.1109/IEDM.1987.191531 ↗
10. Wouters DJ, Colinge JP, Maes HE (1990) Subthreshold slope in thin-film SOI MOSFETs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 37(9):2022–2033. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.5716510.1109/16.57165 ↗
11. Zhang Q, Zhao W, Seabaugh A (2006) Low-subthreshold-swing tunnel transistors. IEEE Electron Device Letters 27(4):297–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2006.87185510.1109/LED.2006.871855 ↗
12. Godoy A, López-Villanueva JA, Jiménez-Tejada JA, Palma A, Gámiz F (2001) A simple subthreshold swing model for short channel MOSFETs. Solid State Electron 45(3):391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1101(01)00060-010.1016/S0038-1101(01)00060-0 ↗
13. Saurabh S, Kumar MJ (Oct. 2016) Fundamentals of tunnel field-effect transistors. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1201/978131536735410.1201/9781315367354 ↗
14. Lu H, Seabaugh A (Jul. 2014) Tunnel field-effect transistors: state-of-theart. IEEE J Electron Devices Soc 2(4):44–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/jeds.2014.232662210.1109/jeds.2014.2326622 ↗
15. Choi WY, Park B-G, Lee JD, Liu T-JK (Aug. 2007) Tunneling field-effect transistors (TFETs) with subthreshold swing (SS) less than 60 mV/dec. IEEE Electron Device Lett 28(8):743–745. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2007.90127310.1109/LED.2007.901273 ↗
16. Mamidala MK, Vishnoi R, Pandey P (Nov. 2016) Tunnel field-effect transistors (TFET): Modelling and simulation. Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.10.1002/9781119246312 ↗
17. Apoorva N, Kumar S, Amin I, Anand S (March 2020) Design and performance optimization of novel Core–Shell Dopingless GAA-nanotube TFET with Si0.5Ge0.5-based source. in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 67(3):789–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.296524410.1109/TED.2020.2965244 ↗
18. A. K. Gupta, A. Raman and N. Kumar, “Cylindrical Nanowire-TFET with Core-Shell Channel Architecture: Design and Investigation”. Silicon, pp.1–8., Dec-2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00331-110.1007/s12633-019-00331-1 ↗
19. Sahay S, Kumar MJ (April 2017) Nanotube junctionless FET: proposal, design, and investigation, in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 64(4): 1851–1856, https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2017.267220310.1109/TED.2017.2672203 ↗
20. Kumar N, Mushtaq U, Amin SI, Anand S (Jan. 2019) Design and performance analysis of dual-gate all around core-shell nanotube TFET. Superlattices Microstructures 125:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2018.09.01210.1016/j.spmi.2018.09.012 ↗
21. Apoorva N, Kumar S, Amin I, Anand S (2020) Design and performance optimization of novel core–shell dopingless GAA-nanotube TFET with Si0.5Ge0.5-based source. IEEE trans. Electron Devices 67(3):789–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.296524410.1109/TED.2020.2965244 ↗
22. Gupta AK, Raman A (2020) Performance analysis of electrostatic plasma-based dopingless nanotube TFET. Applied Physics A 126(7):573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03736-710.1007/s00339-020-03736-7 ↗
23. Gupta AK, Raman A, Kumar N (2020) Performance tuning and reliability analysis of the electrostatically configured nanotube tunnel FET with impact of Interface trap charges. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00777-810.1007/s12633-020-00777-8 ↗
24. Avci UE, Morris DH, Young IA (2015) Tunnel field-effect transistors: prospects and challenges. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 3(3):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2015.239059110.1109/JEDS.2015.2390591 ↗
25. Ilatikhameneh H, Ameen TA, Chen C, Klimeck G, Rahman R (2018) Sensitivity challenge of steep transistors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 65(4):1633–1639. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.280804010.1109/TED.2018.2808040 ↗
26. Claeys C, Leonelli D, Rooyackers R, Vandooren A, Verhulst A, Heyns M, Groeseneken G, De Gendt S (2011) Trends and challenges in Si and hetero-junction tunnel field effect transistors. ECS Transactions 35(5):1510.1149/1.3570772 ↗
27. Krishnamohan T, Kim D, Raghunathan S, Saraswat K (2008) Double-gate strained-Ge heterostructure tunneling FET (TFET) with record high drive currents and 60 mV/dec subthreshold slope, in Proc. IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2008.479683910.1109/IEDM.2008.4796839 ↗
28. Patel J, Sharma D, Yadav S, Lemtur A, Suman P (2019) Performance improvement of nano wire TFET by hetero-dielectric and hetero-material: at device and circuit level. Microelectron J 85:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2019.02.00410.1016/j.mejo.2019.02.004 ↗
29. Kumar N, Raman A (March 2019) Design and investigation of charge-plasma-based work function engineered dual-metal-heterogeneous gate Si-Si0.55Ge0.45 GAA-cylindrical NWTFET for Ambipolar analysis. in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 66(3):1468–1474. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2019.289322410.1109/TED.2019.2893224 ↗
30. Rahimian M, Fathipour M (2017) Improvement of electrical performance in junctionless nanowire TFET using hetero-gate-dielectric. Mater Sci Semicond Process 63:142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2016.12.01110.1016/j.mssp.2016.12.011 ↗
31. Raad BR, Nigam K, Sharma D, Kondekar PN (2016) Performance investigation of bandgap, gate material work function and gate dielectric engineered TFET with device reliability improvement. Superlattice Microst 94:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.04.01610.1016/j.spmi.2016.04.016 ↗
32. Vandooren A, Leonelli D, Rooyackers R, Hikavyy A, Devriendt K, Demand M, Loo R, Groeseneken G, Huyghebaert C (2013) Analysis of trap-assisted tunneling in vertical Si homo-junction and SiGe hetero-junction tunnel-FETs. Solid State Electron 83:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2013.01.02610.1016/j.sse.2013.01.026 ↗
33. Kumar N, Raman A (2019) Performance assessment of the charge-plasma-based cylindrical GAA vertical nanowire TFET with impact of interface trap charges. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 66(10):4453–4460. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2019.293534210.1109/TED.2019.2935342 ↗
34. Kumar N, Amin SI, Anand S (2020) Design and performance optimization of novel Core–Shell Dopingless GAA-nanotube TFET with Si 0.5 Ge 0.5-based source. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 67(3):789–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.296524410.1109/TED.2020.2965244 ↗
35. Agarwal H, Kushwaha P, Lin YK, Kao MY, Liao YH, Dasgupta A, Salahuddin S, Hu C (March 2019) Proposal for capacitance matching in negative capacitance field-effect transistors. in IEEE Electron Device Letters 40(3):463–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2019.289154010.1109/LED.2019.2891540 ↗
36. Gupta AK, Raman A, Kumar N (2020) Charge-plasma-based negative capacitance ring-FET: design. Investigation and Reliability Analysis Journal of Elec Materi 49:4852–4863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-020-08205-810.1007/s11664-020-08205-8 ↗
37. Anderson JD, Merkel J, Macmahon D, Kurinec SK (2018) Evaluation of Si:HfO2 ferroelectric properties in MFM and MFIS structures. IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 6:525–534. https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2018.282697810.1109/JEDS.2018.2826978 ↗
38. Zhou D, Kamlah M, Munz D (2005) Effects of uniaxial prestress on the ferroelectric hysteretic response of soft PZT. J Eur Ceram Soc 25(4):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.01.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.01.016 ↗
39. ATLAS (2011) User’s manual, version 5. SILVACO, Santa Clara, CA, USA
40. Cutaia D et al. (2015) Fabrication and analysis of vertical p-type InAs-Si nanowire Tunnel FETs, EUROSOI-ULIS 2015: 2015 Joint International EUROSOI Workshop and International Conference on Ultimate Integration on Silicon, Bologna, pp. 61–64, https://doi.org/10.1109/ULIS.2015.706377310.1109/ULIS.2015.7063773 ↗
41. Gupta AK, Raman A (2020) Electrostatic-doped nanotube TFET: proposal, design, and investigation with linearity analysis. Silicon. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-020-00584-110.1007/s12633-020-00584-1 ↗