journal article·2016-07-01

Photoelectrochemical properties of InN nanowire photoelectrodes for solar water splitting

J Kamimura, P Bogdanoff, M Ramsteiner, L Geelhaar, H Riechert

Publisher page

Abstract

InN nanowires were grown on Si(111) substrates by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy. Raman spectroscopy showed that the nanowires were strain-free and allowed the deduction of a free carrier concentration of 1–2 × 10 18 cm −3 . This value was confirmed by a Mott–Schottky analysis of electrolyte-based capacitance-voltage measurements. In addition, these measurements directly revealed the existence of a surface accumulation layer in the InN nanowires. In cyclic voltammetry measurements under irradiation from a Xe lamp with about 100 mW cm −2 , high photocurrents of about 4 and 11 mA cm −2 were observed at 1.23 and 1.63 V bias potential versus reversible hydrogen electrode, respectively, using H 2 O 2 as a hole scavenger. By comparing the photocurrent with and without H 2 O 2 , the main limiting factor in the performance of InN nanowire photoanodes was identified to be the poor catalytic efficiency for water oxidation at the surface, followed by parasitic bulk recombination.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl300113810.1021/nl3001138 ↗
2. 10.1039/c2nr32020g10.1039/c2nr32020g ↗
3. 10.1021/ja404043k10.1021/ja404043k ↗
4. 10.1021/nn402882310.1021/nn4028823 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms482510.1038/ncomms4825 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms779710.1038/ncomms7797 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.03310.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.033 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.357532310.1063/1.3575323 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssc.20110044610.1002/pssc.201100446 ↗
10. Kong X · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 2310.1088/0957-4484/23/48/485701 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl404275210.1021/nl4042752 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.491362610.1063/1.4913626 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00206-410.1016/S0927-0248(02)00206-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.02010.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.020 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.366413810.1063/1.3664138 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.190310610.1063/1.1903106 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.12130210.1103/PhysRevB.74.121302 ↗
18. 10.1557/jmr.2011.11210.1557/jmr.2011.112 ↗
19. Kishino K · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 2610.1088/0957-4484/26/22/225602 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.12.10610.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.12.106 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl060547x10.1021/nl060547x ↗
22. 10.1063/1.275629310.1063/1.2756293 ↗
23. 10.1002/pssc.20077859610.1002/pssc.200778596 ↗
24. Chang Y-L · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20
25. 10.1063/1.348882410.1063/1.3488824 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma511213710.3390/ma5112137 ↗
27. 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.209839610.1109/JSTQE.2010.2098396 ↗
28. 10.1039/C0EE00570C10.1039/C0EE00570C ↗
29. 10.1002/cctc.20120047210.1002/cctc.201200472 ↗
30. 10.1149/1.240210410.1149/1.2402104 ↗
31. 10.1557/PROC-884-GG6.610.1557/PROC-884-GG6.6 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.2010.002010.1557/JMR.2010.0020 ↗
33. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8298-710.1007/978-1-4614-8298-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.physe.2007.09.11810.1016/j.physe.2007.09.118 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.474720810.1063/1.4747208 ↗
36. 10.1002/pssr.20120605710.1002/pssr.201206057 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.236488410.1063/1.2364884 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.15521010.1103/PhysRevB.79.155210 ↗
39. 10.1021/cg401838q10.1021/cg401838q ↗
40. 10.1063/1.331951110.1063/1.3319511 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.12550510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.125505 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.156234010.1063/1.1562340 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.03680410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.036804 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.325501010.1063/1.3255010 ↗
45. 10.1002/pssb.20077845210.1002/pssb.200778452 ↗
46. Chang Y L · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 34520310.1088/0957-4484/20/34/345203 ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20100073910.1002/adfm.201000739 ↗
48. 10.1021/nl300476d10.1021/nl300476d ↗
49. 10.1002/pssr.20110553210.1002/pssr.201105532 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.07.02710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.07.027 ↗