journal article·2021-01

Sn4+ precursor enables 12.4% efficient kesterite solar cell from DMSO solution with open circuit voltage deficit below 0.30 V

Yuancai Gong, Yifan Zhang, Erin Jedlicka, Rajiv Giridharagopal, James A. Clark, Weibo Yan, Chuanyou Niu, Ruichan Qiu, Jingjing Jiang, Shaotang Yu, Sanping Wu, Hugh W. Hillhouse, David S. Ginger, Wei Huang, Hao Xin

Science China Materials· Volume 64· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

The limiting factor preventing kesterite (CZTSSe) thin film solar cell performance further improvement is the large open-circuit voltage deficit (Voc,def) issue, which is 0.345V for the current world record device with an efficiency of 12.6%. In this work, SnCl4 and SnCl2_2H2O are respectively used as tin precursor to investigate the Voc,def issue of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution processed CZTSSe solar cells. Different complexations of tin compounds with thiourea and DMSO lead to different reaction pathways from solution to absorber material and thus dramatic difference in photovoltaic performance. The coordination of Sn2+ with Tu leads to the formation of SnS and ZnS and Cu2S in the precursor film, which converted to selenides first and then fused to CZTSSe, resulting in poor film quality and device performance. The highest efficiency obtained from this film is 8.84% with a Voc,def of 0.391V. The coordination of Sn4+ with DMSO facilitates direct formation ofkesterite CZTS phase in the precursor film which directed converted to CZTSSe during selenization, resulting in compositional uniform absorber and high device performance. A device with active area efficiency 12.2% and a Voc,def of 0.344 V was achieved from Sn4+ solution processed absorber. Furthermore, CZTSSe/CdS heterojunction heat treatment (JHT) significantly improved Sn4+ device performance but had slightly negative effect on Sn2+ device. A champion CZTSSe solar cell with a total area efficiency of 12.4% (active are efficiency 13.6%) and low Voc,def of 0.297 V was achieved from Sn4+ solution. Our results demonstrate the preformed uniform kesterite phase enabled by Sn4+ precursor is the key in achieving highly efficient kesterite absorber material. The lowest Voc-def and high efficiency achieved here shines new light on the future of kesterite solar cell.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Todorov TK, Tang J, Bag S, et al. Beyond 11% efficiency: Characteristics of state-of-the-art Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2013, 3: 34–3810.1002/aenm.201200348 ↗
2. Xin H, Vorpahl SM, Collord AD, et al. Lithium-doping inverts the nanoscale electric field at the grain boundaries in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 and increases photovoltaic efficiency. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2015, 17: 23859–2386610.1039/C5CP04707B ↗
3. Qi YF, Kou DX, Zhou WH, et al. Engineering of interface band bending and defects elimination via a Ag-graded active layer for efficient (Cu,Ag)2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells. Energy Environ Sci, 2017, 10: 2401–241010.1039/C7EE01405H ↗
4. Yan C, Huang J, Sun K, et al. Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells with over 10% power conversion efficiency enabled by heterojunction heat treatment. Nat Energy, 2018, 3: 764–77210.1038/s41560-018-0206-0 ↗
5. Guo L, Shi J, Yu Q, et al. Coordination engineering of Cu-Zn-Sn-S aqueous precursor for efficient kesterite solar cells. Sci Bull, 2020, 65: 738–74610.1016/j.scib.2020.01.005 ↗
6. Giraldo S, Jehl Z, Placidi M, et al. Progress and perspectives of thin film kesterite photovoltaic technology: A critical review. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180669210.1002/adma.201806692 ↗
7. Liu F, Wu S, Zhang Y, et al. Advances in kesterite Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 solar cells. Sci Bull, 2020, 65: 698–70110.1016/j.scib.2020.02.014 ↗
8. Wang W, Winkler MT, Gunawan O, et al. Device characteristics of CZTSSe thin-film solar cells with 12.6% efficiency. Adv Energy Mater, 2014, 4: 130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
9. Son DH, Kim SH, Kim SY, et al. Effect of solid-H2S gas reactions on CZTSSe thin film growth and photovoltaic properties of a 12.62% efficiency device. J Mater Chem A, 2019, 7: 25279–2528910.1039/C9TA08310C ↗
10. Nakamura M, Yamaguchi K, Kimoto Y, et al. Cd-free Cu(In,Ga) (Se,S)2 thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%. IEEE J Photovoltaics, 2019, 9: 1863–186710.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2937218 ↗
11. Collord AD, Hillhouse HW. Germanium alloyed kesterite solar cells with low voltage deficits. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 2067–207310.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04806 ↗
12. Hadke S, Levcenko S, Sai Gautam G, et al. Suppressed deep traps and bandgap fluctuations in Cu2CdSnS4 solar cells with ≈8% efficiency. Adv Energy Mater, 2019, 9: 190250910.1002/aenm.201902509 ↗
13. Chen S, Walsh A, Gong XG, et al. Classification of lattice defects in the kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 earth-abundant solar cell absorbers. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 1522–153910.1002/adma.201203146 ↗
14. Gunawan O, Todorov TK, Mitzi DB. Loss mechanisms in hydrazine-processed Cu2ZnSn(Se,S)4 solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2010, 97: 23350610.1063/1.3522884 ↗
15. Min X, Guo L, Yu Q, et al. Enhancing back interfacial contact by in-situ prepared MoO3 thin layer for Cu2ZnSnSxSe4−x solar cells. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 797–80210.1007/s40843-018-9381-1 ↗
16. Kumar M, Dubey A, Adhikari N, et al. Strategic review of secondary phases, defects and defect-complexes in kesterite CZTS-Se solar cells. Energy Environ Sci, 2015, 8: 3134–315910.1039/C5EE02153G ↗
17. Antunez PD, Bishop DM, Luo Y, et al. Efficient kesterite solar cells with high open-circuit voltage for applications in powering distributed devices. Nat Energy, 2017, 2: 884–89010.1038/s41560-017-0028-5 ↗
18. Siebentritt S. High voltage, please! Nat Energy, 2017, 2: 840–84110.1038/s41560-017-0031-x ↗
19. Haass SG, Andres C, Figi R, et al. Complex interplay between absorber composition and alkali doping in high-efficiency kesterite solar cells. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 170176010.1002/aenm.201701760 ↗
20. Su Z, Tan JMR, Li X, et al. Cation substitution of solution-processed Cu2ZnSnS4 thin film solar cell with over 9% efficiency. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 150068210.1002/aenm.201500682 ↗
21. Giraldo S, Saucedo E, Neuschitzer M, et al. How small amounts of Ge modify the formation pathways and crystallization of kesterites. Energy Environ Sci, 2018, 11: 582–59310.1039/C7EE02318A ↗
22. Romanyuk YE, Haass SG, Giraldo S, et al. Doping and alloying of kesterites. J Phys Energy, 2019, 1: 04400410.1088/2515-7655/ab23bc ↗
23. Lee YS, Gershon T, Gunawan O, et al. Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin-film solar cells by thermal co-evaporation with 11.6% efficiency and improved minority carrier diffusion length. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 140137210.1002/aenm.201401372 ↗
24. Todorov T, Hillhouse HW, Aazou S, et al. Solution-based synthesis of kesterite thin film semiconductors. J Phys Energy, 2020, 2: 01200310.1088/2515-7655/ab3a81 ↗
25. Xin H, Katahara JK, Braly IL, et al. 8% Efficient Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells from redox equilibrated simple precursors in DMSO. Adv Energy Mater, 2014, 4: 130182310.1002/aenm.201301823 ↗
26. Fu J, Fu J, Tian Q, et al. Tuning the Se content in Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 absorber to achieve 9.7% solar cell efficiency from a thiol/amine-based solution process. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2018, 1: 594–60110.1021/acsaem.7b00146 ↗
27. Jiang J, Giridharagopal R, Jedlicka E, et al. Highly efficient copper-rich chalcopyrite solar cells from DMF molecular solution. Nano Energy, 2020, 69: 10443810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104438 ↗
28. Wu S, Jiang J, Yu S, et al. Over 12% efficient low-bandgap CuIn(S, Se)2 solar cells with the absorber processed from aqueous metal complexes solution in air. Nano Energy, 2019, 62: 818–82210.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.010 ↗
29. Li J, Yuan ZK, Chen S, et al. Effective and noneffective recombination center defects in Cu2ZnSnS4: Significant difference in carrier capture cross sections. Chem Mater, 2019, 31: 826–83310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03933 ↗
30. Kim S, Park JS, Walsh A. Identification of killer defects in kesterite thin-film solar cells. ACS Energy Lett, 2018, 3: 496–50010.1021/acsenergylett.7b01313 ↗
31. Ki W, Hillhouse HW. Earth-abundant element photovoltaics directly from soluble precursors with high yield using a non-toxic solvent. Adv Energy Mater, 2011, 1: 732–73510.1002/aenm.201100140 ↗
32. Haass SG, Diethelm M, Werner M, et al. 11.2% Efficient solution processed kesterite solar cell with a low voltage deficit. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 150071210.1002/aenm.201500712 ↗
33. Gershon T, Shin B, Bojarczuk N, et al. The role of sodium as a surfactant and suppressor of non-radiative recombination at internal surfaces in Cu2ZnSnS4. Adv Energy Mater, 2015, 5: 140084910.1002/aenm.201400849 ↗
34. Yang KJ, Sim JH, Son DH, et al. Precursor designs for Cu2ZnSn(S, Se)4 thin-film solar cells. Nano Energy, 2017, 35: 52–6110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.025 ↗
35. Rey G, Redinger A, Sendler J, et al. The band gap of Cu2ZnSnSe4: Effect of order-disorder. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105: 11210610.1063/1.4896315 ↗
36. Rey G, Weiss TP, Sendler J, et al. Ordering kesterite improves solar cells: A low temperature post-deposition annealing study. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2016, 151: 131–13810.1016/j.solmat.2016.02.014 ↗