journal article·2020-05Open access

Mesoporous TiO2 mixed crystals for photocatalytic pure water splitting

Lichao Wang, Zhaozhong Xiao, Ye Liu, Shuang Cao, Zhi Ma, Lingyu Piao

Science China Materials· Volume 63· Issue 5

Abstract

Semiconductor mesoporous single crystals have attracted considerable attention due to the merits of excellent light absorption ability and large surface area for photocatalysis capability. However, most of the materials have a relative large size (~um), which can hardly suppress the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes. In this work, we synthesized a series of nano mesoporous TiO2 mixed crystals (brookite and rutile) with high carrier transfer efficiency, improved mass transfer and diffusion abilities, which are crucial for the outstanding photocatalytic performance. Meanwhile, the key factors in the growth process and mechanism of the mesoporous TiO2 mixed crystals were addressed. With the assistance of Pt nanoparticles, H2 and H2O2 production can be simultaneously achieved and the efficiencies can reach up to 9.46 ± 0.56 and 3.29 ± 1.28 μmol mg−1 h−1, respectively. The H2 evolution rate is 2.8-fold higher than that of the reported TiO2 nanoparticle catalyst (3.34 μmol mg−1 h−1). The excellent photocatalytic efficiency can be attributed to the special mixed crystal structure of the mesoporous TiO2 crystals. This work provides new ideas and guidance for precise synthesis of nano mesoporous TiO2 mixed crystals and enhancing their water splitting performance with high value-added products.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Bagheri S, Mohd Hir ZA, Yousefi AT, et al. Progress on mesoporous titanium dioxide: synthesis, modification and applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2015, 218: 206–22210.1016/j.micromeso.2015.05.028 ↗
2. Dong Y, Fei X, Zhou Y. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous - (001) facets TiO2 single crystals. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 403: 662–66910.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.210 ↗
3. Alagarasi A, Rajalakshmi PU, Shanthi K, et al. Ordered mesoporous nanocrystalline titania: a promising new class of photocatalyic materials. Catal Today, 2018, 309: 202–21110.1016/j.cattod.2017.08.001 ↗
4. Zou M, Xiong F, Ganeshraja AS, et al. Visible light photocatalysts (Fe, N):TiO2 from ammonothermally processed, solvothermal self-assembly derived Fe-TiO2 mesoporous microspheres. Mater Chem Phys, 2017, 195: 259–26710.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.04.035 ↗
5. Zhou Y, Fang W, Deng Y, et al. Enhanced photoreduction of Cr(VI) and photooxidation of NO over TiO2−x mesoporous single crystals. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 55927–5593410.1039/C7RA09903G ↗
6. Fan Z, Meng F, Gong J, et al. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of mesoporous Ce-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Mater Sci-Mater Electron, 2016, 27: 11866–1187210.1007/s10854-016-5329-0 ↗
7. Lan K, Liu Y, Zhang W, et al. Uniform ordered two-dimensional mesoporous TiO2 nanosheets from hydrothermal-induced solvent-confined monomicelle assembly. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140: 4135–414310.1021/jacs.8b00909 ↗
8. Jiao Y, Chen X, He F, et al. Simple preparation of uniformly distributed mesoporous Cr/TiO2 microspheres for low-temperature catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene. Chem Eng J, 2019, 372: 107–11710.1016/j.cej.2019.04.118 ↗
9. Lu T, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous anatase TiO2 sphere with high surface area and enhanced photocatalytic activity. J Mater Sci Tech, 2017, 33: 300–30410.1016/j.jmst.2016.03.019 ↗
10. Wang L, Xie Y, Liu W, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous core-shell TiO2 microstructures with coexposed {001}/{101} facets: enhanced intrinsic photocatalytic performance. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2018, 25: 31250–3126110.1007/s11356-018-3113-9 ↗
11. Jitputti J, Pavasupree S, Suzuki Y, et al. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity for water-splitting reaction of nanocrystalline mesoporous titania prepared by hydrothermal method. J Solid State Chem, 2007, 180: 1743–174910.1016/j.jssc.2007.03.018 ↗
12. Xie C, Yang S, Shi J, et al. Highly crystallized C-doped mesoporous anatase TiO2 with visible light photocatalytic activity. Catalysts, 2016, 6: 11710.3390/catal6080117 ↗
13. Mohamed MA, Wan Salleh WN, Jaafar J, et al. Carbon as amorphous shell and interstitial dopant in mesoporous rutile TiO2: Biotemplate assisted sol-gel synthesis and photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 393: 46–5910.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.145 ↗
14. Wu T, Kang X, Kadi MW, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation of mesoporous rutile TiO2 single crystal with wholly exposed {111} facets. Chin J Catal, 2015, 36: 2103–210810.1016/S1872-2067(15)60996-2 ↗
15. Xie C, Yang S, Li B, et al. C-doped mesoporous anatase TiO2 comprising 10 nm crystallites. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2016, 476: 1–810.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.080 ↗
16. Yang Y, Li Y, Wang J, et al. Graphene-TiO2 mesoporous spheres assembled by anatase and rutile nanowires for efficient NO photooxidation. J Alloys Compd, 2017, 699: 47–5610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.204 ↗
17. Zhang W, Zhou Y, Dong C, et al. Carbon-dot-modified TiO2−x mesoporous single crystals with enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of phenol. Res Chem Intermed, 2018, 44: 4797–480710.1007/s11164-018-3269-4 ↗
18. Zheng X, Kuang Q, Yan K, et al. Mesoporous TiO2 single crystals: facile shape-, size-, and phase-controlled growth and efficient photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 11249–1125710.1021/am403482g ↗
19. Fang WQ, Huo Z, Liu P, et al. Fluorine-doped porous single-crystal rutile TiO2 nanorods for enhancing photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Eur J, 2014, 20: 11439–1144410.1002/chem.201402914 ↗
20. Zhou Y, Yi Q, Xing M, et al. Graphene modified mesoporous titania single crystals with controlled and selective photoredox surfaces. Chem Commun, 2016, 52: 1689–169210.1039/C5CC07567J ↗
21. Dörr TS, Deilmann L, Haselmann G, et al. Ordered mesoporous TiO2 gyroids: effects of pore architecture and Nb-doping on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under UV and visible irradiation. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 180256610.1002/aenm.201802566 ↗
22. Zhang W, He H, Tian Y, et al. Synthesis of uniform ordered mesoporous TiO2 microspheres with controllable phase junctions for efficient solar water splitting. Chem Sci, 2019, 10: 1664–167010.1039/C8SC04155E ↗
23. Lu J, Wang Y, Huang J, et al. In situ synthesis of mesoporous C-doped TiO2single crystal with oxygen vacancy and its enhanced sunlight photocatalytic properties. Dyes Pigments, 2017, 144: 203–21110.1016/j.dyepig.2017.05.033 ↗
24. Sreethawong T, Laehsalee S, Chavadej S. Comparative investigation of mesoporous- and non-mesoporous-assembled TiO2 nanocrystals for photocatalytic H2 production over N-doped TiO2 under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 5947–595710.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.007 ↗
25. Zhao Z, Xing Y, Li H, et al. Constructing CdS/Cd/doped TiO2 Z-scheme type visible light photocatalyst for H2 production. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 851–86010.1007/s40843-017-9170-6 ↗
26. Likodimos V, Han C, Pelaez M, et al. Anion-doped TiO2 nanocatalysts for water purification under visible light. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2013, 52: 13957–1396410.1021/ie3034575 ↗
27. Wang Y, Zhu Y, Yang X, et al. Plasmonic Au decorated single-crystal-like TiO2-NaYF4 mesoporous microspheres for enhanced broadband photocatalysis. Chin J Chem, 2017, 35: 949–95610.1002/cjoc.201600771 ↗
28. Pan J, Liu G, Lu GQM, et al. On the true photoreactivity order of {001}, {010}, and {101} facets of anatase TiO2 crystals. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2011, 50: 2133–213710.1002/anie.201006057 ↗
29. Fan Y, Hu G, Yu S, et al. Recent advances in TiO2 nanoarrays/ graphene for water treatment and energy conversion/storage. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 325–34010.1007/s40843-018-9346-3 ↗
30. Ran J, Zhang J, Yu J, et al. Earth-abundant cocatalysts for semiconductor-based photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43: 7787–781210.1039/C3CS60425J ↗
31. Li D, Zhou H, Honma I. Design and synthesis of self-ordered mesoporous nanocomposite through controlled in-situ crystallization. Nat Mater, 2004, 3: 65–7210.1038/nmat1043 ↗
32. Kondo JN, Domen K. Crystallization of mesoporous metal oxides. Chem Mater, 2008, 20: 835–84710.1021/cm702176m ↗
33. Jiao W, Xie Y, Chen R, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous single crystal rutile TiO2 with improved photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical activities. Chem Commun, 2013, 49: 1177010.1039/c3cc46527f ↗
34. Vequizo JJM, Matsunaga H, Ishiku T, et al. Trapping-induced enhancement of photocatalytic activity on brookite TiO2 powders: comparison with anatase and rutile TiO2 powders. ACS Catal, 2017, 7: 2644–265110.1021/acscatal.7b00131 ↗
35. Moss B, Lim KK, Beltram A, et al. Comparing photoelectrochemical water oxidation, recombination kinetics and charge trapping in the three polymorphs of TiO2. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 293810.1038/s41598-017-03065-5 ↗
36. Di Paola A, Bellardita M, Palmisano L. Brookite, the least known TiO2 photocatalyst. Catalysts, 2013, 3: 36–7310.3390/catal3010036 ↗
37. Monai M, Montini T, Fornasiero P. Brookite: Nothing new under the sun? Catalysts, 2017, 7: 30410.3390/catal7100304 ↗
38. Nobre FX, Gil Pessoa Junior WA, Ruiz YL, et al. Facile synthesis of nTiO2 phase mixture: characterization and catalytic performance. Mater Res Bull, 2019, 109: 60–7110.1016/j.materresbull.2018.09.019 ↗
39. Yang Z, Wang B, Cui H, et al. Synthesis of crystal-controlled TiO2 nanorods by a hydrothermal method: rutile and brookite as highly active photocatalysts. J Phys Chem C, 2015, 119: 16905–1691210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02485 ↗
40. Allen NS, Mahdjoub N, Vishnyakov V, et al. The effect of crystalline phase (anatase, brookite and rutile) and size on the photocatalytic activity of calcined polymorphic titanium dioxide (TiO2). Polym Degradation Stability, 2018, 150: 31–3610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.02.008 ↗
41. Xu H, Zhang L. Controllable one-pot synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity of mixed-phase TiO2 nanocrystals with tunable brookite/rutile ratios. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 1785–179010.1021/jp8089903 ↗
42. Lin J, Zhao L, Heo YU, et al. Mesoporous anatase single crystals for efficient Co(2+/3+)-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Energy, 2015, 11: 557–56710.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.017 ↗
43. Zhang H, Banfield JF. Understanding polymorphic phase transformation behavior during growth of nanocrystalline aggregates: insights from TiO2. J Phys Chem B, 2000, 104: 3481–348710.1021/jp000499j ↗
44. Mamaghani AH, Haghighat F, Lee CS. Systematic variation of preparation time, temperature, and pressure in hydrothermal synthesis of macro-/mesoporous TiO2 for photocatalytic air treatment. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem, 2019, 378: 156–17010.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.04.022 ↗
45. Tompsett GA, Bowmaker GA, Cooney RP, et al. The Raman spectrum of brookite, TiO2 (Pbca, Z = 8). J Raman Spectrosc, 1995, 26: 57–6210.1002/jrs.1250260110 ↗
46. Cao Y, Li X, Bian Z, et al. Highly photocatalytic activity of brookite/rutile TiO2 nanocrystals with semi-embedded structure. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2016, 180: 551–55810.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.003 ↗
47. Bhattacharyya D, Kumar P, Smith YR, et al. Plasmonic-enhanced electrochemical detection of volatile biomarkers with gold functionalized TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Mater Sci Tech, 2018, 34: 905–91310.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.010 ↗
48. Byrappa K, Adschiri T. Hydrothermal technology for nanotechnology. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater, 2007, 53: 117–16610.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.04.001 ↗
49. Rossetti Jr. GA, Watson DJ, Newnham RE, et al. Kinetics of the hydrothermal crystallization of the perovskite lead titanate. J Cryst Growth, 1992, 116: 251–25910.1016/0022-0248(92)90631-R ↗
50. Liu S, Zhou J, Liu R, et al. Preparation of nano ZrO2 by integrated technique of high gravity field and microwave field. J Synth Cryst, 2014, 43: 79–86
51. Zhou W, Liu X, Cui J, et al. Control synthesis of rutile TiO2 microspheres, nanoflowers, nanotrees and nanobelts via acid-hydrothermal method and their optical properties. CrystEngComm, 2011, 13: 455710.1039/c1ce05186e ↗
52. Li Y, Zhang M, Guo M, et al. Hydrothermal growth of well-aligned TiO2 nanorod arrays: Dependence of morphology upon hydrothermal reaction conditions. Rare Met, 2010, 29: 286–29110.1007/s12598-010-0050-2 ↗
53. Meng A, Zhang L, Cheng B, et al. Dual cocatalysts in TiO2 photocatalysis. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 180766010.1002/adma.201807660 ↗
54. Xiao F, Zhou W, Sun B, et al. Engineering oxygen vacancy on rutile TiO2 for efficient electron-hole separation and high solar-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 822–83010.1007/s40843-018-9222-4 ↗
55. Testino A, Bellobono IR, Buscaglia V, et al. Optimizing the photocatalytic properties of hydrothermal TiO2 by the control of phase composition and particle morphology. a systematic approach. J Am Chem Soc, 2007, 129: 3564–357510.1021/ja067050+ ↗
56. Li C, Yang W, Li Q. TiO2-based photocatalysts prepared by oxidation of TiN nanoparticles and their photocatalytic activities under visible light illumination. J Mater Sci Tech, 2018, 34: 969–97510.1016/j.jmst.2017.06.010 ↗
57. Zhang W, Zhang H, Xu J, et al. 3D flower-like heterostructured TiO2@Ni(OH)2 microspheres for solar photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chin J Catal, 2019, 40: 320–32510.1016/S1872-2067(18)63169-9 ↗
58. Kinsinger NM, Wong A, Li D, et al. Nucleation and crystal growth of nanocrystalline anatase and rutile phase TiO2 from a water-soluble precursor. Cryst Growth Des, 2010, 10: 5254–526110.1021/cg101105t ↗
59. Tang Y, Zhou P, Chao Y, et al. Face-to-face engineering of ultra-thin Pd nanosheets on amorphous carbon nitride for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Sci China Mater, 2019, 62: 351–35810.1007/s40843-018-9327-y ↗
60. Cao S, Chan TS, Lu YR, et al. Photocatalytic pure water splitting with high efficiency and value by Pt/porous brookite TiO2 nanoflutes. Nano Energy, 2020, 67: 10428710.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104287 ↗
61. Nakabayashi Y, Nishikawa M, Saito N, et al. Significance of hydroxyl radical in photoinduced oxygen evolution in water on monoclinic bismuth vanadate. J Phys Chem C, 2017, 121: 25624–2563110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03641 ↗
62. Seabold JA, Choi KS. Effect of a cobalt-based oxygen evolution catalyst on the stability and the selectivity of photo-oxidation reactions of a WO3 photoanode. Chem Mater, 2011, 23: 1105–111210.1021/cm1019469 ↗
63. Kumaravel V, Mathew S, Bartlett J, et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production using metal doped TiO2: A review of recent advances. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2019, 244: 1021–106410.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.080 ↗
64. Zhang W, Hu Y, Yan C, et al. Surface plasmon resonance enhanced direct Z-scheme TiO2/ZnTe/Au nanocorncob heterojunctions for efficient photocatalytic overall water splitting. Nanoscale, 2019, 11: 9053–906010.1039/C9NR01732A ↗