Tuning the composition and optical band gap of pulsed laser deposited ZnO1−S alloy films by controlling the substrate temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High-quality ZnO 1− x S x thin films were grown on (0 0 1) sapphire substrates in the temperature range of 300–800 °C by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) with a ZnS ceramic target and O 2 as reactive gas. By increasing the substrate temperature, the crystalline quality of the films is enhanced. The S content in the single-phase ZnO 1− x S x films can be systematically adjusted from 0.556 to 0.202 via changing the substrate temperature. The maximum S content in the film grown at 300 °C reaches 0.556 without phase separation, which is significantly higher than the solid solubility limits reported previously for the ZnOS alloys. The narrowed band gap of the ZnO 1− x S x film (2.63 eV) grown at the low substrate temperature will extend the application of ZnO-based optoelectronic devices to the blue light region. As the composition, structure, and band gap energy of the ZnOS films were found to depend critically on the growth temperature, this work suggests a simple and flexible means of tuning the composition and optical band gap of ZnOS alloy films by controlling the substrate temperature during the PLD process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Özgür · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 04130110.1063/1.1992666 ↗
2. Ohtomo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 246610.1063/1.121384 ↗
3. Makino · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 123710.1063/1.1350632 ↗
4. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 06191110.1063/1.3478006 ↗
5. Yoo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 379810.1063/1.1521577 ↗
6. Jeon · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 10111310.1063/1.3340946 ↗
7. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 12190310.1063/1.3567549 ↗
8. He · J. Alloys Comp. · 2014 · 587 · 36910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.201 ↗
9. He · J. Alloys Comp. · 2012 · 534 · 8110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.04.040 ↗
10. Choopun · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 152910.1063/1.1456266 ↗
11. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 342410.1063/1.1576309 ↗
12. Meyer · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 492910.1063/1.1825053 ↗
13. Pan · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 256 · 462110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.02.061 ↗
14. Locmelis · J. Mater. Sci. · 2007 · 42 · 196510.1007/s10853-006-0415-y ↗
15. Wilmott · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2000 · 72 · 31510.1103/RevModPhys.72.315 ↗
16. Persson · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 14640310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.146403 ↗
17. Thankalekshmi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 06370810.1063/1.4754014 ↗
18. Polity · Phys. Status Solidi (a) · 2006 · 203 · 286710.1002/pssa.200669570 ↗
19. Bernard · Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 36 · 319910.1103/PhysRevB.36.3199 ↗