Carrier Tunnelings on Ultrashort‐Gate Junction‐Less Field‐Effect Transistor Designs
Source abstract
Abstract
This study discusses tunneling problems encountered when designing ultrashort‐gate junction‐less field‐effect transistors (FETs). Ultrathin‐body silicon‐on‐insulator (UTB‐SOI) FETs are suitable for nano‐length gate designs owing to the augmented bandgap at channel regions. However, a comprehensive understanding of source‐to‐drain (S/D) and gate‐dielectric (G/D) tunneling is essential to ensure optimal performance and reliability. In this study, numerical simulations of UTB‐SOI FETs are conducted to reveal their effects. First, for S/D tunneling, only a p‐channel FET (PFET) is considered critical, and larger tunneling mass eases this problem. Second, for G/D tunneling, an n‐channel FET (NFET) is considered critical. Therefore, the oxide‐wall UTB‐SOI design is considered for the NFET, enabling a large and small ratios for NFET and PFET. Conversely, the conventional trenched UTB‐SOI is considered suitable for PFET. Moreover, the findings demonstrate that adopting hafnium oxide (HfO) as the oxide material renders good FET characteristics. The optimized FET designs can facilitate the minimum gate length to be 1 nm or shorter, especially for NFETs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering Keio University Yokohama Kanagawa 223‐8522 Japan
Funding
University of Tokyo
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TDMR.2023.334003210.1109/TDMR.2023.3340032 ↗
2. 10.1143/JJAP.42.35110.1143/JJAP.42.351 ↗
3. 10.1109/TCAD.2023.324093810.1109/TCAD.2023.3240938 ↗
4. 10.1109/TNANO.2024.338920910.1109/TNANO.2024.3389209 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2019.289496710.1109/TED.2019.2894967 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-021-04323-310.1038/s41586-021-04323-3 ↗
7. 10.1109/TED.2012.220068810.1109/TED.2012.2200688 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.03210.1016/j.solener.2020.11.032 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mee.2003.12.04710.1016/j.mee.2003.12.047 ↗
10. 2021
11. 10.1109/LED.2015.243771510.1109/LED.2015.2437715 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sse.2022.10853310.1016/j.sse.2022.108533 ↗
13. M.Ieong P. M.Solomon S. E.Laux H. P.Wong D.Chidambarrao inInt. Electron Device Meeting 1998 Technical Digest IEEE1998.
14. 10.1063/1.36536410.1063/1.365364 ↗
15. 10.1088/0268-1242/22/5/02110.1088/0268-1242/22/5/021 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.136106510.1063/1.1361065 ↗
17. A.Benvenuti M. R.Pinto W. M.Coughran N. L.Schryer C. U.Naldi G.Ghione inInt. Electron Device Meeting 1991 Technical Digest IEEE1991.