journal article·2022-07

Low Leakage and High ION/IOFF Ratio in Partial Gated AlGaN/GaN Nanowire Field‐Effect Transistors

Akhil S. Kumar, Swaroop Ganguly, Dipankar Saha

Publisher page

Abstract

Lateral nanowire (NW) field‐effect transistors are fabricated by a top‐down approach on an AlGaN/GaN heterostructure. A combination of dry and anisotropic wet etching is used to form the NW. The channel is controlled by a 2D electric field originating from two partial gates on the parallel sides of the nanowire channel. While a larger overlap of the gate with the channel region, as in a gate‐all‐around transistor, improves gate control in terms of transconductance gm, gate leakage current and ION/IOFF deteriorate. Partial overlapping gate transistors are found to provide a trade‐off, providing extremely low gate leakage current (≈10 μA cm−2), very low IOFF (100 fA μm−1), and very high ION/IOFF (5 × 108). Despite the nature of the partial gate, a good subthreshold swing (SS) of ≈79 mV decade−1 is observed. Various transistor performance parameters can be tuned within a certain window of trade‐offs between them as the transistor evolves from a partial gate to a gate‐all‐around structure. A 1D nature of the channel near the transistor threshold voltage is found to offset the limitations of the partial gate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and devices · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Quantum Mechanics Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering IIT Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2003.81924810.1109/TED.2003.819248 ↗
2. 10.1109/JPROC.2002.102156710.1109/JPROC.2002.1021567 ↗
3. 10.1109/16.90643910.1109/16.906439 ↗
4. 10.1109/55.62493010.1109/55.624930 ↗
5. Kim S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 10 · 1
6. 10.1063/1.502339110.1063/1.5023391 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.506440710.1063/1.5064407 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.494019710.1063/1.4940197 ↗
9. Kumar A. S. · Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 214 · 2
10. 10.1109/LED.2012.222286110.1109/LED.2012.2222861 ↗
11. 10.7567/APEX.8.06650110.7567/APEX.8.066501 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.480824110.1063/1.4808241 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.496001510.1063/1.4960015 ↗
14. 10.1143/JJAP.48.08100210.1143/JJAP.48.081002 ↗
15. 10.1109/LED.2011.217900310.1109/LED.2011.2179003 ↗
16. 10.1109/LED.2011.217997110.1109/LED.2011.2179971 ↗
17. 10.1109/TED.2015.249892310.1109/TED.2015.2498923 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.509886410.1063/1.5098864 ↗
19. 10.1109/LED.2017.278578510.1109/LED.2017.2785785 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.494019710.1063/1.4940197 ↗
21. 10.1109/LED.2013.229655610.1109/LED.2013.2296556 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.495271510.1063/1.4952715 ↗
23. 10.1109/TNANO.2011.217799310.1109/TNANO.2011.2177993 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature1129310.1038/nature11293 ↗