CrAs Monolayer: Low Buckled 2D Half‐Metal Ferromagnet
Source abstract
Abstract
Ab initio calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) are performed to study the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of 2D free‐standing honeycomb CrAs. It is shown that CrAs has a low buckled stable structure. Magnetic CrAs has larger buckling than nonmagnetic CrAs. 2D CrAs is a ferromagnetic semiconductor at lattice constant , and above this lattice constant CrAs is a half‐metal ferromagnet. 2D CrAs is shown to be half‐metal ferromagnetic with a magnetic moment of 3.0 μB per unit cell, at equilibrium structure. The orbital of the band is completely empty in the spin‐down state, whereas it is almost occupied in the spin‐up state, and the magnetic moment in the band is mainly dominated by the orbital of Cr. The and orbitals of the band are partially occupied in the spin‐up state and behave like a metal, whereas they are insulators in the spin‐down state. Phonon calculations confirm the thermodynamic stability of 2D CrAs. The ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) interactions between the Cr atoms reveal that the FM state is more stable than the AFM state of 2D CrAs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Iron-based superconductors research · Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad 45320 Pakistan
Institute of Physics of ANAS Azerbaijan Tecnical University G. Javid Ave. 131 AZ1143 Baku Azerbaijan
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.486879410.1063/1.4868794 ↗
4. 10.2147/NSA.S4032410.2147/NSA.S40324 ↗
5. 10.7566/JPSJ.84.12100310.7566/JPSJ.84.121003 ↗
6. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/44/44300210.1088/0953-8984/27/44/443002 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-017-04210-w10.1038/s41598-017-04210-w ↗
8. 10.1209/0295-5075/105/3701210.1209/0295-5075/105/37012 ↗
9. 10.1038/ncomms565110.1038/ncomms5651 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn501226z10.1021/nn501226z ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms545810.1038/ncomms5458 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.08542310.1103/PhysRevB.91.085423 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41699-018-0068-010.1038/s41699-018-0068-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.04210.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.042 ↗
15. 10.1088/1361-648X/aab8b810.1088/1361-648X/aab8b8 ↗
16. 10.1209/0295-5075/119/5700210.1209/0295-5075/119/57002 ↗
17. 10.1038/nature2239110.1038/nature22391 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature2206010.1038/nature22060 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.03540710.1103/PhysRevB.92.035407 ↗
20. 10.3390/cryst705012110.3390/cryst7050121 ↗
21. 10.1021/cm504242t10.1021/cm504242t ↗
22. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed ↗
23. 10.1143/JJAP.39.L111810.1143/JJAP.39.L1118 ↗
24. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.25-170310.3891/acta.chem.scand.25-1703 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.21441710.1103/PhysRevB.82.214417 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.122710.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.723110.1103/PhysRevB.43.7231 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00325-710.1016/S0927-0256(02)00325-7 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41598-019-44444-410.1038/s41598-019-44444-4 ↗
33. 10.1002/smll.20140204110.1002/smll.201402041 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1555310.1103/PhysRevB.62.15553 ↗
35. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa6b9810.1088/1361-648X/aa6b98 ↗
36. 10.1080/14786435.2017.137560710.1080/14786435.2017.1375607 ↗
37. Further work would be needed to see the correlation between the bandwidthWand Coulomb potentialU i.e. U/W under stress/buckling.
38. Matsuda M. · Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 031017