journal article·2025-08

An Analysis of the Linearity of a GaSb/Si Heterojunction TFET‐Based Highly Sensitive pH Sensor

Kalai Selvi Kanagarajan, Girish Wadhwa

physica status solidi (a)· Volume 222· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

This work presents a novel pH sensor design, referred to as the hetero‐VTFET‐pH sensor. It integrates GaSb/Si heterojunction vertical tunnel field‐effect transistors (TFETs) with split‐gate and step‐channel heterojunction TFET architecture. GaSb in the source region optimizes sensor sensitivity by enhancing carrier tunneling through GaSb–Si heterojunctions. The pH model is developed to evaluate the change in the potential drop due to pH change in the electrolyte. The pH model calculates the density of states corresponding to pH values for the electrolyte solution. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis for drain current, transconductance has been done with a variation of the pH value of the electrolyte. The proposed pH sensor is simulated using SILVACO TCAD. In addition, linearity figures of merit are analyzed, including VIP2, VIP3, IIP3, and IMD3. The proposed pH sensor exhibits a voltage of ≈100 mV pH−1, exceeding the Nernst limit of 59 mV pH−1.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ECE Department Government College of Engineering Tirunelveli Tamil Nadu 627007 India

Amity School of Engineering and Technology Amity University Punjab Mohali Punjab 140306 India

Graphic Era Hill University Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248002 India

Graphic Era Deemed University Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248002 India

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cta.261810.1002/cta.2618 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.09.05510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.09.055 ↗
3. 10.1021/jp980642x10.1021/jp980642x ↗
4. 10.1109/TED.2017.266852010.1109/TED.2017.2668520 ↗
5. Turner A. P. F. · 1987
6. Lim T.‐C. · 2011
7. 10.1109/LED.2012.223407810.1109/LED.2012.2234078 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20180673910.1002/adma.201806739 ↗
9. 10.1109/TBME.1970.450268810.1109/TBME.1970.4502688 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mejo.2020.10471010.1016/j.mejo.2020.104710 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.11695110.1016/j.mseb.2023.116951 ↗
12. 10.1109/TNB.2022.320224210.1109/TNB.2022.3202242 ↗
13. 10.1109/TNANO.2022.314892210.1109/TNANO.2022.3148922 ↗
14. 10.1109/TNANO.2019.291819210.1109/TNANO.2019.2918192 ↗
15. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.322403610.1109/JSEN.2022.3224036 ↗
16. 10.1109/JSEN.2017.271610210.1109/JSEN.2017.2716102 ↗
17. 10.1109/TED.2012.220811510.1109/TED.2012.2208115 ↗
18. Tanu W. · Silicon · 2020 · 13 · 1
19. Wadhwa G. · Silicon · 2020 · 13 · 1
20. Mahalaxmi A. · IEEE Sens. J. · 2020 · 21 · 2526
21. 10.1109/T-ED.1983.2128410.1109/T-ED.1983.21284 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.297901610.1109/JSEN.2020.2979016 ↗
23. 10.1109/TED.2017.273282010.1109/TED.2017.2732820 ↗
24. J.Go P. R.Nair B.Reddy B.Dorvel R.Bashir M. A.Alam in2010 Int. Electron Devices Meeting Piscataway NJ USA IEEE2010 pp.8–7.
25. 10.1021/nl200623n10.1021/nl200623n ↗
26. Ahn J.‐H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102
27. 10.1109/LED.2011.217402410.1109/LED.2011.2174024 ↗
28. 10.1109/TED.2020.296442810.1109/TED.2020.2964428 ↗
29. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.304405610.1109/JSEN.2020.3044056 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41928-020-00531-310.1038/s41928-020-00531-3 ↗
31. Atlas User's Manual Silvaco Int. Softw. Silvaco Inc. Santa Clara CA USA2016.
32. 10.1109/TED.2015.246425110.1109/TED.2015.2464251 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.micrna.2022.20739210.1016/j.micrna.2022.207392 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mejo.2020.10497310.1016/j.mejo.2020.104973 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11220-025-00563-z10.1007/s11220-025-00563-z ↗