journal article·2017-03

Highly efficient organic photovoltaic cells fabricated by electrospray deposition using a non‐halogenated solution

Kazuya Takahira, Asuki Toda, Katsumi Suzuki, Takeshi Fukuda

physica status solidi (a)· Volume 214· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Since a large amount of solvents are needed for roll‐to‐roll printing processes of organic photovoltaic cells, an environmentally friendly process for practical mass production systems is in high demand. In this research, a highly efficient organic photovoltaic cell was successfully demonstrated by the electrospray deposition method using a non‐halogenated solvent, o‐xylene. An addition of acetonitrile and 1,8‐diiodooctane drastically reduced domain size of the organic active layer, resulting in improved device performance. In addition, the photoconversion efficiency was continuously increased with increasing the solvent evaporation time of a droplet deposited on a substrate, and the highest photoconversion efficiency of 5.6% was achieved by optimizing the solvent evaporation time. Current‐density–voltage characteristics under irradiation with AM 1.5 light and corresponding AFM images of the active layers electrosprayed with and without the addition of 1,8‐diiodooctane in o‐xylene and acetonitrile.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Functional Materials Science Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University 255 Shimo‐Okubo, Sakura‐ku, Saitama 338‐8570 Japan

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20140207210.1002/adma.201402072 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.8410.1038/nphoton.2015.84 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.01410.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.014 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20150342010.1002/adfm.201503420 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.06.02410.1016/j.orgel.2016.06.024 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cep.2010.07.01210.1016/j.cep.2010.07.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.02010.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.020 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4TA07029A10.1039/C4TA07029A ↗
9. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.00410.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.004 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20090352810.1002/adma.200903528 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5EE01917F10.1039/C5EE01917F ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.11.04210.1016/j.solmat.2014.11.042 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20150217710.1002/aenm.201502177 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.06.01610.1016/j.orgel.2012.06.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.06.01910.1016/j.tsf.2016.06.019 ↗
16. 10.7567/JJAP.51.02BK1210.7567/JJAP.51.02BK12 ↗
17. A.JaworekandA. T.Sobczyk J.Elecstrostatics66 197(2008).10.1016/j.elstat.2007.10.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.07.04810.1016/j.tsf.2011.07.048 ↗
19. 10.1002/pssr.20110523210.1002/pssr.201105232 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.5b1226010.1021/acsami.5b12260 ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms386710.1038/ncomms3867 ↗