An innovative and facile synthesis route of (La,Sr) 2FeO 4+ δ –La 0.4Sr 0.6FeO 3− δ composite as a highly stable air electrode for reversible solid oxide cell applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving thermal cycle stability is an imperative challenge for the successful commercialization of solid oxide cells (SOC) technology. Ruddlesden-Popper (R-P) oxides, with their thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) compatible with common electrolytes, are promising candidates for SOC applications. However, the two-dimensional conduction characteristic of R-P oxides leads to insufficient catalytic activity, which hinders their performance. Here, we proposed a win-win strategy of self-assembly decoration, employing a one-pot method to address this issue. By using the single perovskite oxide (La0.4Sr0.6FeO3) to modify the R-P oxide (La0.8Sr1.2FeO4+δ), we enhance the electrochemistry performance without compromising the stability of the composite electrode. The strategic incorporation of 10 mol% perovskite phase at 800 °C resulted in a significant 49% reduction in polarization resistance, an impressive 86% increase in maximum power density under power generation mode, and a notable 33% increase in electrolysis current density under electrolysis mode. Furthermore, the perovskite-decorated R-P oxide composite also exhibit high thermal and chemical stability, with negligible performance degradation observed under both thermal cycling and charge/discharge cycling conditions. Our results demonstrate that such dual-phase composite, which is simultaneously produced by one-step process, with outstanding catalytic activity and stability can be considered an effective strategy for the advancement of solid oxide cell.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. P Qiu. Materials of solid oxide electrolysis cells for H 2O and CO 2 electrolysis: A review. 2023, 12: 1463-1510.10.26599/JAC.2023.9220767 ↗
2. Y Zhang. Recent progress on advanced materials for solid-oxide fuel cells operating below 500 °C. 2017, 29: 1700132.10.1002/adma.201700132 ↗
3. P Holtappels. SOFC system operating strategies for mobile applications. 2005, 5: 499-508.10.1002/fuce.200400088 ↗
4. RJ Milcarek. Performance investigation of a micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell stack with 3,000 rapid thermal cycles. 2018, 394: 86-93.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.060 ↗
5. J S Shin. Degradation mechanisms of solid oxide fuel cells under various thermal cycling conditions. 2021, 13: 49868-49878.10.1021/acsami.1c13779 ↗
6. M Singh. Recent advancement of solid oxide fuel cells towards semiconductor membrane fuel cells. 2024, 4: 400012.10.20517/energymater.2023.54 ↗
7. V Vibhu. High performance LSC infiltrated LSCF oxygen electrode for high temperature steam electrolysis application. 2019, 166: F102-F108.10.1149/2.0741902jes ↗
8. F Tietz. Thermal expansion of SOFC materials. 1999, 5: 129-139.10.1007/BF02375916 ↗
9. R Pelosato. Cobalt based layered perovskites as cathode material for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells: A brief review. 2015, 298: 46-67.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.034 ↗
10. N Wang. Functional layer engineering to improve performance of protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2023, 42: 2250-2260.10.1007/s12598-022-02257-x ↗
11. SP Jiang. Development of lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite perovskite electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells—A review. 2019, 44: 7448-7493.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.212 ↗
12. W Liu. Structure evaluation of anode-supported planar solid oxide fuel cells based on single/double-sided electrolyte(s) under redox conditions. 2020, 17: 1314-1321.10.1111/ijac.13429 ↗
13. G Nirala. Ruddlesden–Popper phase A 2BO 4 oxides: Recent studies on structure, electrical, dielectric, and optical properties. 2020, 9: 129-148.10.1007/s40145-020-0365-x ↗
14. S Park. A sulfur-tolerant cathode catalyst fabricated with in situ exsolved CoNi alloy nanoparticles anchored on a Ruddlesden–Popper support for CO 2 electrolysis. 2020, 8: 138-148.10.1039/C9TA07700F ↗
15. null10.1039/D0MH00477D ↗
16. YS Feng. Robust tantalum tuned perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. 2024, 43: 3055-3065.10.1007/s12598-024-02691-z ↗
17. H-S Kim. Compilation of all the isothermal mass/charge transport properties of the mixed conducting La 2NiO 4+ δ at elevated temperatures. 2011, 13: 4651-4658.10.1039/c0cp02120b ↗
18. T Nakamura. Thermally-induced and chemically-induced structural changes in layered perovskite-type oxides Nd 2− x Sr x NiO 4+ δ ( x =0, 0.2, 0.4). 2010, 181: 402-411.10.1016/j.ssi.2010.02.002 ↗
19. ZF Li. Evaluation of Fe-doped Pr 1.8Ba 0.2NiO 4 as a high-performance air electrode for reversible solid oxide cell. 2023, 308: 123002.10.1016/j.seppur.2022.123002 ↗
20. PP Ding. Review on Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites as cathode for solid oxide fuel cells. 2021, 4: 022002.10.1088/2515-7639/abe392 ↗
21. VV Kharton. Chemically induced expansion of La 2NiO 4+ δ -based materials. 2007, 19: 2027-2033.10.1021/cm070096x ↗
22. JY Chen. Chemical diffusion and oxygen exchange of LaNi 0.4Fe 0.6O 3− δ ceramics. 2014, 3: 240-249.10.1007/s40145-014-0116-y ↗
23. D Parfitt. Molecular dynamics study of oxygen diffusion in Pr 2NiO 4+ δ . 2010, 12: 6834-6836.10.1039/c001809k ↗
24. MY Xie. Review on Fe-based double perovskite cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells. 2024, 4: 400007.10.20517/energymater.2023.70 ↗
25. RK Sharma. Design of La 2– x Pr x NiO 4+ δ SOFC cathodes: A compromise between electrochemical performance and thermodynamic stability. 2017, 5: 1120-1132.10.1039/C6TA08011A ↗
26. H Shirani-Faradonbeh. Synthesis and electrochemical studies of novel cobalt free (Nd 0.9La 0.1) 1.6Sr 0.4Ni 0.75Cu 0.25O 3.8 (NLSNC4) cathode material for IT-SOFCs. 2019, 19: 578-586.10.1002/fuce.201900065 ↗
27. YH Liu. A high performance La 2NiO 4+ δ impregnated PrBaCo 2O 5+ δ cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells. 2023, 403: 116387.10.1016/j.ssi.2023.116387 ↗
28. S Han. Beneficial effect of oxygen-ion conductor infiltration on the electrocatalytic properties of a heavily strontium-doped lanthanum nickelate Ruddlesden–Popper SOFC cathode. 2024, 30: 2177-2189.10.1007/s11581-024-05431-6 ↗
29. JK Sang. Enhancing coking tolerance of flat-tube solid oxide fuel cells for direct power generation with nearly-dry methanol. 2023, 556: 232485.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232485 ↗
30. PP Zhang. Direct power generation from methanol by solid oxide fuel cells with a Cu-ceria based catalyst layer. 2022, 194: 439-447.10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.089 ↗
31. S Das. Optical, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of a fluorite-perovskite Ce 0.9Gd 0.1O 2− ∂ −La 0.6Sr 0.4FeO 3− ∂ nanocomposite synthesized by one pot sol–gel auto-combustion route. 2024, 50: 3397-3408.10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.11.087 ↗
32. ZY Zhao. Stable perovskite-fluorite dual-phase composites synthesized by one-pot solid-state reactive sintering for protonic ceramic fuel cells. 2021, 47: 32856-32866.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.182 ↗
33. null10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101050 ↗
34. R Yang. Revealing the detrimental CO 2 reduction effect of La 0.6Sr 0.4FeO 3− δ -derived heterostructure in solid oxide electrolysis cells. 2024, 27: 109648.10.1016/j.isci.2024.109648 ↗
35. Y Zhang. Enhanced oxygen reduction kinetics of IT-SOFC cathode with PrBaCo 2O 5+ δ /Gd 0.1Ce 1.9O 2− δ coherent interface. 2022, 10: 3495-3505.10.1039/D1TA09615J ↗
36. TH Wan. Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: Implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. 2015, 184: 483-499.10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗
37. MB Effat. Bayesian and hierarchical Bayesian based regularization for deconvolving the distribution of relaxation times from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data. 2017, 247: 1117-1129.10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.050 ↗
38. WT Hong. Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. 2015, 8: 1404-1427.10.1039/C4EE03869J ↗
39. YL Lee. Prediction of solid oxide fuel cell cathode activity with first-principles descriptors. 2011, 4: 3966-3970.10.1039/c1ee02032c ↗
40. HD Li. Fabrication of two lanthanides co-doped Bi 2MoO 6 photocatalyst: Selection, design and mechanism of Ln 1/Ln 2 redox couple for enhancing photocatalytic activity. 2017, 217: 378-387.10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.015 ↗
42. MJD Rushton. Effect of strain on the oxygen diffusion in yttria and gadolinia co-doped ceria. 2013, 230: 37-42.10.1016/j.ssi.2012.09.015 ↗
43. JA Dawson. Proton trapping in Y and Sn co-doped BaZrO 3. 2015, 3: 10045-10051.10.1039/C5TA01450F ↗
44. Y Zheng. Oxygen reduction kinetic enhancements of intermediate-temperature SOFC cathodes with novel Nd 0.5Sr 0.5CoO 3− δ /Nd 0.8Sr 1.2CoO 4± δ heterointerfaces. 2018, 51: 711-720.10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.017 ↗
45. PP Gao. Thermal expansion and elastic moduli of electrolyte materials for high and intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell. 2017, 300: 1-9.10.1016/j.ssi.2016.11.015 ↗
46. I Yasuda. Precise determination of the chemical diffusion coefficient of calcium-doped lanthanum chromites by means of electrical conductivity relaxation. 1994, 141: 1268-1273.10.1149/1.2054908 ↗
47. JD Kim. Characterization of LSM–YSZ composite electrode by ac impedance spectroscopy. 2001, 143: 379-389.10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00877-3 ↗
48. M Li. La 0.4Bi 0.4Sr 0.2FeO 3− δ as cobalt-free cathode for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell. 2016, 191: 651-660.10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.164 ↗
49. MJ Escudero. A kinetic study of oxygen reduction reaction on La 2NiO 4 cathodes by means of impedance spectroscopy. 2007, 611: 107-116.10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.08.006 ↗
50. M Saccoccio. Optimal regularization in distribution of relaxation times applied to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy: Ridge and lasso regression methods—A theoretical and experimental study. 2014, 147: 470-482.10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.058 ↗
51. J Xia. A perspective on DRT applications for the analysis of solid oxide cell electrodes. 2020, 349: 136328.10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136328 ↗
52. DM Bastidas. A symmetrical solid oxide fuel cell demonstrating redox stable perovskite electrodes. 2006, 16: 1603-1605.10.1039/b600532b ↗