Mechanism of defect passivation achieved by chemical interaction in inverted perovskite solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
A variety of defects exist in the solution-processed polycrystalline perovskites, resulting in photovoltaic output losses and degradation. Chemical interaction is a promising way to realize the passivation of defects. Herein, cetyl pyridinium bromide (CPB) containing both pyridine units and long-chain alkyl groups was introduced in the perovskite precursor solution as a passivation agent. Experimental results show that pyridine unit in CPB formed coordination with uncoordinated Pb 2+, which also interact with N–H in MAPbI 3. Meanwhile, long-chain alkyl groups in CPB had interaction with MAI and PbI 2 in MAPbI 3 . Thus, trace amount of CPB in the precursor solution improved the optoelectronic properties of perovskite films and suppressed non-radiative carrier recombination in perovskite solar cell (PSC). CPB-modified perovskite films exhibit a lower trap-state density and stronger carrier migration capability. It enables the significant enhancement of PCE values of the p-i-n structured PSC from 18.27 % to 20.53 %, accompanied by the improved stability. Our work exhibits more possibility between passivating additive and PSC performance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Best Research Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html.
2. Lin · Nature · 2022 · 603 · 7310.1038/s41586-021-04372-8 ↗
3. Ni · Nat. Energy · 2022 · 7 · 6510.1038/s41560-021-00949-9 ↗
4. Yi · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 5 · 643210.1021/acsaem.2c00923 ↗
5. Guo · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12
6. Wu · Sol. RRL · 2020 · 4
7. Tress · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 15110.1039/C7EE02415K ↗
8. Zhang · Small · 2018 · 14
9. Wu · Joule · 2021 · 5 · 86310.1016/j.joule.2021.03.001 ↗
10. Tavakoli · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8
11. Wu · ChemSusChem · 2021 · 14 · 435410.1002/cssc.202101573 ↗
12. Noel · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 981510.1021/nn5036476 ↗
13. Hadadian · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 868110.1002/adma.201602785 ↗
14. Fu · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 9
15. Zhen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 275410.1039/C8TA12206G ↗
16. Zheng · Nat. Energy · 2020 · 5 · 13110.1038/s41560-019-0538-4 ↗
17. Niu · Synth. Met. · 2019 · 254 · 8510.1016/j.synthmet.2019.06.011 ↗
18. Malek · Appl. Clay Sci. · 2015 · 109–110 · 810.1016/j.clay.2015.03.007 ↗
19. Xin · J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 4210.1007/s10904-011-9615-2 ↗
20. Nizam · Mater. Res. Express · 2019 · 6
21. Zeng · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2005 · 576 · 8510.1016/j.jelechem.2004.10.009 ↗
22. Barzetti · J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. · 1996 · 92 · 140110.1039/ft9969201401 ↗
23. Yang · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 240410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01039 ↗
24. Li · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 3780410.1021/acsami.9b13951 ↗
25. Kurmaev · Nanomaterials · 2022 · 12 · 434910.3390/nano12234349 ↗
26. Emelianov · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2022 · 13 · 274410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00497 ↗
27. Zhang · J. Solid State Electrochem. · 2021 · 25 · 1
28. Liu · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 399 · 14410.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.093 ↗
29. Tress · Energy Environ. Sci. Ees · 2018 · 11 · 15110.1039/C7EE02415K ↗
30. Chen · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
31. Li · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 207210.1021/acsenergylett.1c00620 ↗