Performance optimization of monolithic all-perovskite tandem solar cells under standard and real-world solar spectra
Source abstract
Abstract
Constructing monolithic all-perovskite tandem solar cells is a promising strategy to increase the efficiency beyond the single-junction limit. However, two fundamental questions remain unanswered: (1) is “current match” always a necessary condition of maximizing the tandem efficiency and (2) how can we minimize the current-mismatching loss under the real-world solar spectra? Herein, we answer the questions by conducting simulations using validated optical and electrical models. The best efficiency of this all-perovskite tandem structure under standard test conditions is achieved when the wide-bandgap top subcell has a higher short-circuit current density of about 1.05 mA cm−2 than the bottom one. To answer the second question, we use real-world weather data as the inputs of the simplified models, which dramatically reduce the calculation time and improve the annual energy yield by up to 4.5%. The marginal current-mismatching losses, and even gains, ease the concern over the de-rated tandem products under real-world solar spectra. Constructing monolithic all-perovskite tandem solar cells is a promising strategy to increase the efficiency beyond the single-junction limit. However, two fundamental questions remain unanswered: (1) is “current match” always a necessary condition of maximizing the tandem efficiency and (2) how can we minimize the current-mismatching loss under the real-world solar spectra? Herein, we answer the questions by conducting simulations using validated optical and electrical models. The best efficiency of this all-perovskite tandem structure under standard test conditions is achieved when the wide-bandgap top subcell has a higher short-circuit current density of about 1.05 mA cm−2 than the bottom one. To answer the second question, we use real-world weather data as the inputs of the simplified models, which dramatically reduce the calculation time and improve the annual energy yield by up to 4.5%. The marginal current-mismatching losses, and even gains, ease the concern over the de-rated tandem products under real-world solar spectra.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · solar cell performance optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. NREL
3. Monolithic all-perovskite tandem solar cells with 24.8% efficiency exploiting comproportionation to suppress Sn (ii) oxidation in precursor ink10.1038/s41560-019-0466-3 ↗
4. All-perovskite tandem solar cells with 24.2% certified efficiency and area over 1 cm 2 using surface-anchoring zwitterionic antioxidant10.1038/s41560-020-00705-5 ↗
5. All-perovskite tandem solar cells with improved grain surface passivation10.1038/s41586-021-04372-8 ↗
6. Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with> 29% efficiency by enhanced hole extraction10.1126/science.abd4016 ↗
7. Mechanically stacked, two-terminal graphene-based perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with efficiency over 26%10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.015 ↗
8. Blade-coated perovskites on textured silicon for 26%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.008 ↗
9. Grain engineering for perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells with efficiency of 25.4%10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.003 ↗
10. Proton radiation hardness of perovskite tandem photovoltaics10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.006 ↗
11. Too many junctions? A case study of multijunction thin-film silicon solar cells10.1002/adsu.201700077 ↗
12. III-V-on-Si tandem solar cells10.1016/j.joule.2021.01.010 ↗
13. Solution-processed all-perovskite multi-junction solar cells10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.007 ↗
14. Solution-processed monolithic all-perovskite triple-junction solar cells with efficiency exceeding 20%10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01184 ↗
15. Interplay between temperature and bandgap energies on the outdoor performance of perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells10.1038/s41560-020-00687-4 ↗
16. I.E.C. · 2019
17. ASTM · 2012
18. Optical analysis of C CH 3 NH 3 Sn x Pb 1−x I 3 absorbers: A roadmap for perovskite-on-perovskite tandem solar cells10.1039/C6TA04840D ↗
19. Perovskite-perovskite tandem photovoltaics with optimized band gaps10.1126/science.aaf9717 ↗
20. Efficient monolithic perovskite/perovskite tandem solar cells10.1002/aenm.201602121 ↗
21. High voltage vacuum-deposited CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3–CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 tandem solar cells10.1039/C8EE01936C ↗
22. Efficient two-terminal all-perovskite tandem solar cells enabled by high-quality low-bandgap absorber layers10.1038/s41560-018-0278-x ↗
23. Methodology of energy yield modelling of perovskite-based multi-junction photovoltaics10.1364/OE.27.00A507 ↗
24. Perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells: marriage of convenience or true love story? – An overview10.1002/admi.201700731 ↗
25. Highly efficient monolithic perovskite silicon tandem solar cells: analyzing the influence of current mismatch on device performance10.1039/C9SE00120D ↗
26. Influence of the subcell properties on the fill factor of two-terminal perovskite-silicon tandem solar cells10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00156 ↗
27. Matching of silicon thin-film tandem solar cells for maximum power output10.1155/2013/314097 ↗
28. Efficient bifacial monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells via bandgap engineering10.1038/s41560-020-00756-8 ↗
29. Predicting and optimising the energy yield of perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells under real world conditions10.1039/C7EE01232B ↗
30. Strategies for high performance perovskite/c-Si tandem solar cells: effects of bandgap engineering, solar concentration and device temperature10.1016/j.optmat.2020.109935 ↗
31. Spectral mismatch correction and spectrometric characterization of monolithic III-V multi-junction solar cells10.1002/pip.407 ↗
32. Pro4 optical model for solar cell simulation and its application to multijunction solar cells10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2669640 ↗
33. Comparing optical performance of a wide range of perovskite/silicon tandem architectures under real-world conditions10.1515/nanoph-2020-0643 ↗
34. Impact of irradiance data on the energy yield modeling of dual-junction solar module stacks for one-sun applications10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3064562 ↗
35. Novel seven-parameter model for photovoltaic modules10.1016/j.solmat.2014.07.016 ↗
36. Temperature coefficients of perovskite photovoltaics for energy yield calculations10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00748 ↗
37. Perovskite solar cells go outdoors: field testing and temperature effects on energy yield10.1002/aenm.202000454 ↗
38. Relaxed current matching requirements in highly luminescent perovskite tandem solar cells and their fundamental efficiency limits10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02481 ↗
39. Standard or local solar spectrum? Implications for solar technologies studies in the Atacama Desert10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.039 ↗
40. Solar Resource Maps and GIS Data. https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/tech-specs.
41. Spectral On-Demand Data. https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/about/spectral-on-demand-data.html.
42. Comparison of solar spectral irradiance measurements using the average photon energy parameter10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.023 ↗
43. Nelder and Mead Simplex Algorithm. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/69636-nelder-and-mead-simplex-algorithm.
44. Photovoltaic module thermal / wind performance: long -Term monitoring and model development for energy rating
45. Interpolation for 2-D Gridded Data in Meshgrid Format. https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/interp2.html.