journal article·2016-08-01Open access

Towards understanding the difference of optoelectronic performance between micro- and nanoscale metallic layers

Mikita Marus, Aliaksandr Hubarevich, Hong Wang, Yauhen Mukha, Aliaksandr Smirnov, Hui Huang, Xiao Wei Sun, Weijun Fan

Optical Materials Express· Volume 6· Issue 8

Abstract

Optoelectronic performance of nano-/microscale porous and wired silver (Ag) and aluminum (Al) layers was theoretically studied. Within the nanoscale region, Ag porous and wired layers – possessing stronger surface plasmon response over the whole visible spectrum –demonstrate up to a 20% higher average transmittance in comparison to identic Al design. In the microscale region, difference in the average transmittance between the above mentioned metallic layers decreases to 5%. Moreover, the microscale Ag and Al layers exhibit up to a 5% higher average transmittance. The obtained results allow deeper analysis of the pattern scale of metallic transparent conductive layers for various optoelectronic applications, such as displays, solar cells, light-emitting diodes, touch screens and smart windows.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic Crystals and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Kang · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 793310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03019 ↗
2. Paeng · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 276210.1002/adma.201500098 ↗
3. Catrysse · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 294410.1021/nl1011239 ↗
4. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 14311210.1063/1.2193653 ↗
5. Layani · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 558110.1039/c4nr00102h ↗
6. Hubarevich · Phys. Status Solidi., A Appl. Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 212 · 217410.1002/pssa.201532198 ↗
7. Jeong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 03111810.1063/1.4906459 ↗
8. Du · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 18111210.1063/1.4765341 ↗
9. Maurer · Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 292110.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04319 ↗
10. Hubarevich · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 1786010.1364/OE.23.017860 ↗
11. Yan · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 15 · 170410.1166/jnn.2015.9499 ↗
12. Marus · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 620910.1364/OE.23.006209 ↗
13. Rathmell · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 355810.1002/adma.201000775 ↗
14. Coe · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2008 · 59 · 17910.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093703 ↗
15. Marus · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 2679410.1364/OE.23.026794 ↗
16. Last · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1971 · 27 · 171910.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1719 ↗
17. Fitzpatrick · Phys. Lett. A · 1974 · 47 · 20710.1016/0375-9601(74)90010-3 ↗
18. Kirkpatrick · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1973 · 45 · 57410.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
19. van de Groep · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 313810.1021/nl301045a ↗
20. Hu · MRS Bull. · 2011 · 36 · 76010.1557/mrs.2011.234 ↗
21. Xie · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · A35510.1364/OE.21.00A355 ↗
22. Rycenga · Chem. Rev. · 2011 · 111 · 366910.1021/cr100275d ↗
23. Choi · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 97710.1039/C2NR32221H ↗
24. Barnes · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 82410.1038/nature01937 ↗
25. Aryal · in SID Symposium Dig. Tech. Pap. · 2014 · 45 · 19410.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00053.x ↗
26. Kang · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 139110.1002/adma.200700134 ↗
27. Kang · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 440810.1002/adma.200800750 ↗