Spike propagation in a nanolaser-based optoelectronic neuron
Source abstract
Abstract
With the recent development of artificial intelligence and deep neural networks, alternatives to the Von Neumann architecture are in demand to run these algorithms efficiently in terms of speed, power and component size. In this theoretical study, a neuromorphic, optoelectronic nanopillar metal-cavity consisting of a resonant tunneling diode (RTD) and a nanolaser diode (LD) is demonstrated as an excitable pulse generator. With the proper configuration, the RTD behaves as an excitable system while the LD translates its electronic output into optical pulses, which can be interpreted as bits of information. The optical pulses are characterized in terms of their width, amplitude, response delay, distortion and jitter times. Finally, two RTD-LD units are integrated via a photodetector and their feasibility to generate and propagate optical pulses is demonstrated. Given its low energy consumption per pulse and high spiking rate, this device has potential applications as building blocks in neuromorphic processors and spiking neural networks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Photonic and Optical Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of the Balearic Islands, Carretera de Valldemossa
University of Strathclyde
Universidade de Lisboa
Bio- and Nanophotonics, INL - International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory
Funding
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies · UK Research and InnovationTuring AI Acceleration Fellowshops Programme
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Merolla · Science · 2014 · 345 · 66810.1126/science.1254642 ↗
2. Miller · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2017 · 35 · 34610.1109/JLT.2017.2647779 ↗
3. Shastri · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 1912610.1038/srep19126 ↗
4. Romeira · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 1951010.1038/srep19510 ↗
5. Feldmann · Nature · 2019 · 569 · 20810.1038/s41586-019-1157-8 ↗
6. Deng · IEEE Access · 2018 · 6 · 6795110.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878940 ↗
7. Nahmias · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2013 · 19 · 110.1109/JSTQE.2013.2257700 ↗
8. Hejda · APL Photonics · 2021 · 6 · 06080210.1063/5.0048674 ↗
9. Ellis · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 29710.1038/nphoton.2011.51 ↗
10. Takeda · Nat. Photonics · 2013 · 7 · 56910.1038/nphoton.2013.110 ↗
11. Crosnier · Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 29710.1038/nphoton.2017.56 ↗
12. Hill · Nat. Photonics · 2007 · 1 · 58910.1038/nphoton.2007.171 ↗
13. Oulton · Nature · 2009 · 461 · 62910.1038/nature08364 ↗
14. Romeira · Nanophotonics · 2020 · 9 · 414910.1515/nanoph-2020-0177 ↗
15. Izhikevich · 2007
16. Zhang · Photonics Res. · 2021 · 9 · B20110.1364/PRJ.412141 ↗
17. Zhang · Photonics Res. · 2021 · 9 · 105510.1364/PRJ.422628 ↗
18. Shastri · Nat. Photonics · 2021 · 15 · 10210.1038/s41566-020-00754-y ↗
19. Romeira · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2018 · 54 · 110.1109/JQE.2018.2802464 ↗
20. Romeira · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 2093110.1364/OE.21.020931 ↗
21. Slight · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2008 · 44 · 115810.1109/JQE.2008.2000924 ↗
22. Wang · IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 2018 · 66 · 469810.1109/TMTT.2018.2859983 ↗
23. Schulman · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1996 · 17 · 22010.1109/55.491835 ↗
24. Yokoyama · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 480110.1063/1.343793 ↗
25. Mørk · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 14110310.1063/1.5022958 ↗
26. Bjork · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1991 · 27 · 238610.1109/3.100877 ↗
27. Rice · Phys. Rev. A · 1994 · 50 · 431810.1103/PhysRevA.50.4318 ↗
28. Diebold · Electron. Lett. · 2016 · 52 · 199910.1049/el.2016.2941 ↗
29. Ortega-Piwonka · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2021 · 15 · 03401710.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034017 ↗
30. Ortega-Piwonka · Chaos · 2021 · 31 · 11312810.1063/5.0062686 ↗
31. Samardak · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 10240810.1063/1.3577609 ↗
32. Goulding · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 15390310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.153903 ↗
33. Selmi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 112 · 18390210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.183902 ↗
34. Barbay · Opt. Lett. · 2011 · 36 · 447610.1364/OL.36.004476 ↗
35. Kuhnert · Nature · 1989 · 337 · 24410.1038/337244a0 ↗
36. Strogatz · 2015
37. Agez · Phys. Rev. E · 2008 · 77 · 02621810.1103/PhysRevE.77.026218 ↗
38. Gardiner · 1995
39. Tredicce · Am. J. Phys. · 2004 · 72 · 79910.1119/1.1688783 ↗
40. Marconi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 125 · 13410210.1103/PhysRevLett.125.134102 ↗
41. Scharpf · Opt. Commun. · 1987 · 63 · 34410.1016/0030-4018(87)90189-1 ↗
42. Mandel · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 181810.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1818 ↗
43. Romeira · Chaos · 2017 · 27 · 11432310.1063/1.5008888 ↗
44. Robertson · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 609810.1038/s41598-020-62945-5 ↗
45. Romeira · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2013 · 49 · 3110.1109/JQE.2012.2225415 ↗