Non-Hermitian Floquet-free analytically solvable time-dependent systems [Invited]
Source abstract
Abstract
The non-Hermitian models, which are symmetric under parity ( P ) and time-reversal ( T ) operators, are the cornerstone for the fabrication of new ultra-sensitive optoelectronic devices. However, providing the gain in such systems usually demands precise control of nonlinear processes, limiting their application. In this paper, to bypass this obstacle, we introduce a class of time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians (not necessarily Floquet) that can describe a two-level system with temporally modulated on-site potential and couplings. We show that implementing an appropriate non-Unitary gauge transformation converts the original system to an effective one with a balanced gain and loss. This will allow us to derive the evolution of states analytically. Our proposed class of Hamiltonians can be employed in different platforms such as electronic circuits, acoustics, and photonics to design structures with hidden PT -symmetry potentially without imaginary onsite amplification and absorption mechanism to obtain an exceptional point.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Nonlinear Photonic Systems · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Rui · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 24511610.1103/PhysRevB.100.245116 ↗
2. Longhi · Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 81 · 02210210.1103/PhysRevA.81.022102 ↗
3. Ding · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 23531010.1103/PhysRevB.92.235310 ↗
4. Chou · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2011 · 74 · 11660110.1088/0034-4885/74/11/116601 ↗
5. Zhu · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4 · 03104210.1103/PhysRevX.4.031042 ↗
6. Yao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 08680310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086803 ↗
7. Ghaemi-Dizicheh · Phys. Rev. A · 2021 · 104 · 02351510.1103/PhysRevA.104.023515 ↗
8. Ramezani · 202210.48550/arXiv.2207.12193 ↗
9. Tuxbury · Commun. Phys. · 2022 · 5 · 21010.1038/s42005-022-00973-5 ↗
10. Schomerus · Opt. Lett. · 2013 · 38 · 191210.1364/OL.38.001912 ↗
11. Lee · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 13390310.1103/PhysRevLett.116.133903 ↗
12. Lieu · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 04510610.1103/PhysRevB.97.045106 ↗
13. Feng · Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 75210.1038/s41566-017-0031-1 ↗
14. El-Ganainy · Nat. Phys. · 2018 · 14 · 1110.1038/nphys4323 ↗
15. El-Ganainy · Opt. Lett. · 2007 · 32 · 263210.1364/OL.32.002632 ↗
16. Makris · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 10390410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.103904 ↗
17. Rüter · Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 19210.1038/nphys1515 ↗
18. Regensburger · Nature · 2012 · 488 · 16710.1038/nature11298 ↗
19. Peng · Science · 2014 · 346 · 32810.1126/science.1258004 ↗
20. Hodaei · Science · 2014 · 346 · 97510.1126/science.1258480 ↗
21. Peng · Nat. Phys. · 2014 · 10 · 39410.1038/nphys2927 ↗
22. Schindler · Phys. Rev. A · 2011 · 84 · 04010110.1103/PhysRevA.84.040101 ↗
23. Chitsazi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 09390110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.093901 ↗
24. d. J. León-Montiel · Commun. Phys. · 2018 · 1 · 110.1038/s42005-017-0001-4 ↗
25. Berry · Czech. J. Phys. · 2004 · 54 · 103910.1023/B:CJOP.0000044002.05657.04 ↗
26. Bender · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2007 · 70 · 94710.1088/0034-4885/70/6/R03 ↗
27. Rotter · J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. · 2009 · 42 · 15300110.1088/1751-8113/42/15/153001 ↗
28. Moiseyev · 2011
29. Heiss · J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. · 2012 · 45 · 44401610.1088/1751-8113/45/44/444016 ↗
30. Cao · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2015 · 87 · 6110.1103/RevModPhys.87.61 ↗
31. Lin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 21390110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.213901 ↗
32. Fleury · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 590510.1038/ncomms6905 ↗
33. Feng · Science · 2014 · 346 · 97210.1126/science.1258479 ↗
34. Dong · Nat. Electron. · 2019 · 2 · 33510.1038/s41928-019-0284-4 ↗
35. Assawaworrarit · Nat. Electron. · 2020 · 3 · 27310.1038/s41928-020-0399-7 ↗
36. Li · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 124 · 19390110.1103/PhysRevLett.124.193901 ↗
37. Li · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 14 · 03100210.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.031002 ↗
38. Guo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 09390210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.093902 ↗
39. Ornigotti · J. Opt. · 2014 · 16 · 06550110.1088/2040-8978/16/6/065501 ↗
40. Feng · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 10810.1038/nmat3495 ↗
41. Liu · Sci. Adv. · 2019 · 5 · eaax914410.1126/sciadv.aax9144 ↗
42. Jiang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 123 · 19360410.1103/PhysRevLett.123.193604 ↗
43. Yang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2022 · 128 · 06570110.1103/PhysRevLett.128.065701 ↗
44. Hassan · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 118 · 09300210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.093002 ↗
45. Milburn · Phys. Rev. A · 2015 · 92 · 05212410.1103/PhysRevA.92.052124 ↗
46. Shirley · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 138 · B97910.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 ↗
47. Barone · Phys. Rev. A · 1977 · 15 · 110910.1103/PhysRevA.15.1109 ↗
48. Quiroz-Juárez M. A. Cochran Z. A. Aragón J. L. Joglekar Y. N. d. J. León-Montiel R. , “ Parity-time symmetry via time-dependent non-unitary gauge fields ,” arXiv , arXiv:2109.03846 ( 2021 ).
49. Rechtsman · Nature · 2013 · 496 · 19610.1038/nature12066 ↗
50. Doppler · Nature · 2016 · 537 · 7610.1038/nature18605 ↗