Piezoelectric ion gated organic electrochemical transistors for efficient vibration sensing and on-site amplification
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate detection of physiological vibrations is vital for monitoring health and enabling sensory feedback in bioelectronics. Current technologies often suffer from low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), bulkiness, and the need for external amplification. Here, we introduce piezoelectric internal ion-gated organic electrochemical transistors (Piezo-IGTs), which efficiently convert mechanical vibrations into amplified electrical signals. These devices integrate laminated P(VDF-TrFE) microfiber films as the gate atop the transistor channel, generating voltage upon deformation to modulate mobile ions in the conducting polymer. Fabricated via sequential deposition and lamination, Piezo-IGTs achieve high fill factors and efficient on-site amplification, improving SNR over standalone piezoelectric films. They operate near 0 V gate voltage, enabling low-power performance. We validate their functionality in mechanomyography, speech recognition, and mechanocardiography using microscale Piezo-IGTs. This self-contained, flexible architecture demonstrates promise for integration into implantable and wearable systems, offering real-time, high-fidelity acquisition of bio-mechanical signals in next-generation health monitoring and neuroprosthetic applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A. & Koch, C. The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).10.1038/nrn3241 ↗
2. Hodaie, M., Wennberg, R. A., Dostrovsky, J. O. & Lozano, A. M. Chronic Anterior Thalamus Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy. Epilepsia 43, 603–608 (2002).10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.26001.x ↗
3. Wilson, B. S. Cochlear implants: Current designs and future possibilities. J. Rehabilit. Res. Dev. 45, 695–730 (2008).10.1682/JRRD.2007.10.0173 ↗
4. Wong, K. et al. Auditory Brainstem Implants: Recent Progress and Future Perspectives. Front. Neurosci. 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00010 (2019).10.3389/fnins.2019.00010 ↗
5. Fan, X. et al. Ultrathin, Rollable, Paper-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Acoustic Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Sound Recording. ACS Nano 9, 4236–4243 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b00618 ↗
6. Jung, Y., Kwak, J.-H., Lee, Y., Kim, W. & Hur, S. Development of a Multi-Channel Piezoelectric Acoustic Sensor Based on an Artificial Basilar Membrane. Sensors 14, 117–128 (2013).10.3390/s140100117 ↗
7. Lee, H. S. et al. Flexible Inorganic Piezoelectric Acoustic Nanosensors for Biomimetic Artificial Hair Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 6914–6921 (2014).10.1002/adfm.201402270 ↗
8. Roy, K. et al. A Self-Powered Wearable Pressure Sensor and Pyroelectric Breathing Sensor Based on GO Interfaced PVDF Nanofibers. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 2013–2025 (2019).10.1021/acsanm.9b00033 ↗
9. Wang, C. et al. Tissue‐Adhesive Piezoelectric Soft Sensor for In Vivo Blood Pressure Monitoring During Surgical Operation. Adv. Functional Mater. 33 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202303696 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202303696 ↗
10. Schwartz, G. et al. Flexible polymer transistors with high pressure sensitivity for application in electronic skin and health monitoring. Nat. Commun. 4, 1859–1859 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2832 ↗
11. Zhao, C., Park, J., Root, S. E. & Bao, Z. Skin-inspired soft bioelectronic materials, devices and systems. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 671–690 (2024).10.1038/s44222-024-00194-1 ↗
12. Khodagholy, D. et al. In vivo recordings of brain activity using organic transistors. Nat. Commun. 4, 1575–1575 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2573 ↗
13. Drakopoulou, S. et al. Hybrid neuroelectronics: towards a solution-centric way of thinking about complex problems in neurostimulation tools. Front. Electronics 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2023.1250655 (2023).10.3389/felec.2023.1250655 ↗
14. Aabid, A. et al. A Systematic Review of Piezoelectric Materials and Energy Harvesters for Industrial Applications. Sensors 21, 4145–4145 (2021).10.3390/s21124145 ↗
15. Jiang, C. et al. All-electrospun flexible triboelectric nanogenerator based on metallic MXene nanosheets. Nano Energy 59, 268–276 (2019).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.052 ↗
16. İlik, B., Koyuncuoğlu, A., Şardan-Sukas, Ö. & Külah, H. Thin film piezoelectric acoustic transducer for fully implantable cochlear implants. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 280, 38–46 (2018).10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.020 ↗
17. Inaoka, T. et al. Piezoelectric materials mimic the function of the cochlear sensory epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 18390–18395 (2011).10.1073/pnas.1110036108 ↗
18. Zaszczyńska, A., Gradys, A. & Sajkiewicz, P. Progress in the Applications of Smart Piezoelectric Materials for Medical Devices. Polymers 12, 2754–2754 (2020).10.3390/polym12112754 ↗
19. Viola, G. et al. Bioinspired Multiresonant Acoustic Devices Based on Electrospun Piezoelectric Polymeric Nanofibers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 34643–34657 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c09238 ↗
20. Zhang, D. et al. Enhanced piezoelectric performance of PVDF/BiCl3/ZnO nanofiber-based piezoelectric nanogenerator. Eur. Polym. J. 166, 110956–110956 (2022).10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110956 ↗
21. Stadlober, B., Zirkl, M. & Irimia-Vladu, M. Route towards sustainable smart sensors: ferroelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-based materials and their integration in flexible electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1787–1825 (2019).10.1039/C8CS00928G ↗
22. Chen, F. et al. Effect of stretching orientation on the crystalline structure and energy storage properties of poly(vinylidene fluoride) films. Mater. Today Commun. 41, 110598–110598 (2024).10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110598 ↗
23. Motamedi, A. S., Mirzadeh, H., Hajiesmaeilbaigi, F., Bagheri-Khoulenjani, S. & Shokrgozar, M. Effect of electrospinning parameters on morphological properties of PVDF nanofibrous scaffolds. Prog. Biomater. 6, 113–123 (2017).10.1007/s40204-017-0071-0 ↗
24. Ico, G. et al. Size-dependent piezoelectric and mechanical properties of electrospun P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers for enhanced energy harvesting. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2293–2304 (2016).10.1039/C5TA10423H ↗
25. Wang, X. et al. Tactile-Sensing Based on Flexible PVDF Nanofibers via Electrospinning: A Review. Sensors 18, 330–330 (2018).10.3390/s18020330 ↗
26. Chen, D., Wang, C., Chen, W., Chen, Y. & Zhang, J. X. J. PVDF-Nafion nanomembranes coated microneedles for in vivo transcutaneous implantable glucose sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 74, 1047–1052 (2015).10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.036 ↗
27. Li, T. et al. Pure OPM nanofibers with high piezoelectricity designed for energy harvesting in vitro and in vivo. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 5343–5352 (2018).10.1039/C8TB01702F ↗
28. Pan, C.-T. et al. Development of MMG sensors using PVDF piezoelectric electrospinning for lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 301, 111708–111708 (2020).10.1016/j.sna.2019.111708 ↗
29. Xin, Y. et al. Flexible piezoelectric sensor based on PVDF-TrFE/Nanoclay composite nanofibers for physiological micro-vibration signal sensing. Measurement 201, 111742–111742 (2022).10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111742 ↗
30. Li, G.-Y. et al. Hierarchical PVDF-HFP/ZnO composite nanofiber–based highly sensitive piezoelectric sensor for wireless workout monitoring. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 5, 766–775 (2022).10.1007/s42114-021-00331-z ↗
31. Rivnay, J., Wang, H., Fenno, L., Deisseroth, K. & Malliaras, G. G. Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing. Sci. Adv. 3 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601649 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601649 ↗
32. Ohayon, D., Druet, V. & Inal, S. A guide for the characterization of organic electrochemical transistors and channel materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 1001–1023 (2023).10.1039/D2CS00920J ↗
33. Nawaz, A., Liu, Q., Leong, W. L., Fairfull‐Smith, K. E. & Sonar, P. Organic Electrochemical Transistors for In Vivo Bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 33 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101874 (2021).10.1002/adma.202101874 ↗
34. Rivnay, J. et al. Organic electrochemical transistors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17086–17086 (2018).10.1038/natrevmats.2017.86 ↗
35. Makhinia, A., Beni, V. & Andersson Ersman, P. Screen-Printed Piezoelectric Sensors on Tattoo Paper Combined with All-Printed High-Performance Organic Electrochemical Transistors for Electrophysiological Signal Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 61428–61434 (2024).10.1021/acsami.3c10299 ↗
36. Shintaku, H., Inaoka, T., Nakagawa, T., Kawano, S. & Ito, J. Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response by Using Bionic Auditory Membrane in Guinea Pigs. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng. 8, 198–208 (2013).10.1299/jbse.8.198 ↗
37. Cea, C. et al. Enhancement-mode ion-based transistor as a comprehensive interface and real-time processing unit for in vivo electrophysiology. Nat. Mater. 19, 679–686 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0638-3 ↗
38. Spyropoulos, G. D., Gelinas, J. N. & Khodagholy, D. Internal ion-gated organic electrochemical transistor: A building block for integrated bioelectronics. Sci. Adv. 5 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7378 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aau7378 ↗
39. Mai, M., Ke, S., Lin, P. & Zeng, X. Ferroelectric Polymer Thin Films for Organic Electronics. J. Nanomater. 2015 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/812538 (2015).10.1155/2015/812538 ↗
40. Shao, H., Fang, J., Wang, H. & Lin, T. Effect of electrospinning parameters and polymer concentrations on mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion of randomly-oriented electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber mats. RSC Adv. 5, 14345–14350 (2015).10.1039/C4RA16360E ↗
41. Ruggero, M. A. Cochlear Delays and Traveling Waves: Comments on ‘Experimental Look at Cochlear Mechanics’: [A. Dancer, Audiology 1992;31:301-312]. Int. J. Audiol. 33, 131–142 (1994).10.3109/00206099409071874 ↗
42. Lepak-Kuc, S. et al. Low-temperature silver-based ink for highly conductive paths through industrial printing processes suitable for thermally sensitive substrates and beyond. J. Mater. Res. 39, 297–310 (2024).10.1557/s43578-023-01223-2 ↗
43. Idris, M. K. & Grau, G. Dispense Printing of Silver Flake Inks on Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces. Adv. Eng. Mater. 26 https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202401302 (2024).10.1002/adem.202401302 ↗
44. Sharova, A. S. et al. Chitosan-gated organic transistors printed on ethyl cellulose as a versatile platform for edible electronics and bioelectronics. Nanoscale 15, 10808–10819 (2023).10.1039/D3NR01051A ↗
45. Spyropoulos, G. D. et al. Organic and perovskite solar modules innovated by adhesive top electrode and depth-resolved laser patterning. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2302–2313 (2016).10.1039/C6EE01555G ↗
46. Friedlein, J. T., McLeod, R. R. & Rivnay, J. Device physics of organic electrochemical transistors. Org. Electron. 63, 398–414 (2018).10.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.010 ↗
47. Braendlein, M., Lonjaret, T., Leleux, P., Badier, J. M. & Malliaras, G. G. Voltage Amplifier Based on Organic Electrochemical Transistor. Adv. Sci. 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600247 (2017).10.1002/advs.201600247 ↗
48. O’Rourke, M. F., Pauca, A. & Jiang, X. J. Pulse wave analysis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 51, 507–522 (2001).10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01400.x ↗
49. Mulder, M. P. et al. Distinct morphologies of arterial waveforms reveal preload‐, contractility‐, and afterload‐deficient hemodynamic instability: An in silico simulation study. Physiological Rep. 10 https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15242 (2022).10.14814/phy2.15242 ↗
50. Mitchell, G. F. Arterial stiffness and wave reflection: Biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. Artery Res. 3, 56–56 (2009).10.1016/j.artres.2009.02.002 ↗
51. Wu, Y. et al. From electricity to vitality: the emerging use of piezoelectric materials in tissue regeneration. Burns Trauma 12 https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkae013 (2024).10.1093/burnst/tkae013 ↗
52. Yue, X. et al. Silk fibroin-based piezoelectric nanofibrous scaffolds for rapid wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 11, 5232–5239 (2023).10.1039/D3BM00308F ↗