Investigating contact-limited scaling in sub-15-nm TMD FETs from first-principles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we present a first-principles field-effect transistors (FETs) contact study based on density functional theory and the non-equilibrium Green’s function method. We estimate device performance for three transition-metal-dichalcogenide (TMD) channel materials (WSe 2 , WS 2 , and MoS 2 ), including metal contacts (Ni) at source and drain for the first time. The results show that the variation in R c has less impact on I ON and I OFF at a given V DD than the variation in subthreshold swing ( SS ; with differences exceeding 30 mV/dec), suggesting SS may be more sensitive to the contacting material choice than previously realized at gate lengths below 15 nm. Among the channel and contact material combinations studied, Ni/WSe 2 FET leads to the best short-channel device performance. The quantum transport calculation shows the highest density of charge accumulation at the Ni/WSe 2 contact edge. Inspired by this first-principles study, we performed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and verified the bonding strength at the Ni/WSe 2 contact to be stronger than Ni/WS 2 and Ni/MoS 2 contacts. This supports the theoretical finding that the contact/channel materials need to be chosen to optimize SS and I ON in short-channel TMD FETs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao, W. et al. The future transistors. Nature 620, 501–515 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06145-x ↗
2. Zhuo, F. et al. Modifying the power and performance of 2-dimensional MoS2 field effect transistors. Research 6, 0057 (2023).10.34133/research.0057 ↗
3. Liu, Y. et al. Promises and prospects of two-dimensional transistors. Nature 591, 43–53 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03339-z ↗
4. Allain, A., Kang, J., Banerjee, K. & Kis, A. Electrical contacts to two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1195–1205 (2015).10.1038/nmat4452 ↗
5. Wang, Y. et al. Van der Waals contacts between three-dimensional metals and two-dimensional semiconductors. Nature 568, 70–74 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1052-3 ↗
6. Desai, S. B. et al. MoS2 transistors with 1-nanometer gate lengths. Science 354, 99–102 (2016).10.1126/science.aah4698 ↗
7. Park, J. H. et al. Band Structure Engineering of Layered WSe2 via One-Step Chemical Functionalization. ACS Nano 13, 7545–7555 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.8b09351 ↗
8. Cheng, Z. et al. How to report and benchmark emerging field-effect transistors. Nat. Electron. 5, 416–423 (2022).10.1038/s41928-022-00798-8 ↗
9. Shen, P. C. et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature 593, 211–217 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 ↗
10. Li, W. et al. Approaching the quantum limit in two-dimensional semiconductor contacts. Nature 613, 274–279 (2023).10.1038/s41586-022-05431-4 ↗
11. Jiang, J. et al. Yttrium-doping-induced metallization of molybdenum disulfide for ohmic contacts in two-dimensional transistors. Nat. Electron 7, 545–556 (2024).10.1038/s41928-024-01176-2 ↗
12. Jiang, J., Xu, L., Qiu, C. & Peng, L. M. Ballistic two-dimensional InSe transistors. Nature 616, 470–475 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-05819-w ↗
13. Yang, E., Seo, J. E., Seo, D. & Chang, J. Intrinsic limit of contact resistance in the lateral heterostructure of metallic and semiconducting PtSe2. Nanoscale 12, 14636–14641 (2020).10.1039/D0NR03001E ↗
14. Ding, Y. et al. High-Performance ballistic quantum transport of sub-10 nm monolayer GeS field-effect transistors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 1151–1161 (2021).10.1021/acsaelm.0c01019 ↗
15. Zhao, H. et al. Quantum Transport of Sub-10 nm Monolayer WGe2N4 Transistors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 5086–5094 (2021).10.1021/acsaelm.1c00829 ↗
16. Quhe, R. et al. Simulations of Quantum Transport in Sub-5-nm Monolayer Phosphorene Transistors. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 024022 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.024022 ↗
17. Quhe, R. et al. High-performance sub-10 nm monolayer Bi2O2Se transistors. Nanoscale 11, 532–540 (2019).10.1039/C8NR08852G ↗
18. Klinkert, C. et al. 2-D Materials for Ultrascaled Field-Effect Transistors: One Hundred Candidates under the Ab Initio Microscope. ACS Nano 14, 8605–8615 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c02983 ↗
19. Duflou, R., Pourtois, G., Houssa, M. & Afzalian, A. Fundamentals of low-resistive 2D-semiconductor metal contacts: an ab-initio NEGF study. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 7, 38 (2023).10.1038/s41699-023-00402-3 ↗
20. Arnab, P. et al. in 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 28.25.21-28.25.24 (San Francisco, CA, USA, 2022).
21. Parto, K. et al. One-Dimensional Edge Contacts to Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides: Uncovering the Role of Schottky-Barrier Anisotropy in Charge Transport across MoS2/Metal Interfaces. Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 064068 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.064068 ↗
22. Wu, T. & Guo, J. Multiscale modeling of semimetal contact to two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 023507 (2022).10.1063/5.0097213 ↗
23. Somvanshi, D. et al. Nature of carrier injection in metal/2D-semiconductor interface and its implications for the limits of contact resistance. Phys. Rev. B 96, 205423 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205423 ↗
24. Lizzit, D., Khakbaz, P., Driussi, F., Pala, M. & Esseni, D. Ohmic Behavior in Metal Contacts to n/p-Type Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides: Schottky versus Tunneling Barrier Trade-off. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 6, 5737–5746 (2023).10.1021/acsanm.3c00166 ↗
25. Yang, N. et al. Ab Initio Computational Screening and Performance Assessment of van der Waals and Semimetallic Contacts to Monolayer WSe2 P-Type Field-Effect Transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 70, 2090–2097 (2023).10.1109/TED.2023.3241569 ↗
26. Liu, H.-T. et al. Growth behavior of Ni on hydrogen-etched WS2 Surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16(41), 56336–56342 (2024).
27. Stephen, M. et al. Hole Contacts on Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Interface Chemistry and Band Alignments. ACS Nano 8(6), 6265–6272 (2014).10.1021/nn501728w ↗
28. Soler, J.eM. et al. The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 2745–2779 (2002).
29. Garcia, A. et al. Siesta: Recent developments and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 204108 (2020).10.1063/5.0005077 ↗
30. Taylor, J., Guo, H. & Wang, J. Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices. Phys. Rev. B 63, 245407 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407 ↗
31. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mat. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
32. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
33. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
34. Tang, W., Sanville, E. & Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009).
35. Sanville, E., Kenny, S. D., Smith, R. & Henkelman, G. An improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. J. Comp. Chem. 28, 899–908 (2007).10.1002/jcc.20575 ↗
36. Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A. & Jónsson, H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput. Mater. Sci. 36, 354–360 (2006).10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 ↗
37. Yu, M. & Trinkle, D. R. Accurate and efficient algorithm for Bader charge integration. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 064111 (2011).10.1063/1.3553716 ↗