High-throughput parameter estimation from experimental data using Bayesian Inference with accelerated sampling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract BIAS (Bayesian Inference with Accelerated Sampling) is a high-throughput parameter estimation framework designed to rapidly infer the root causes of device underperformance in real time. It integrates a deep neural network surrogate model with accelerated Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to efficiently explore high-dimensional parameter spaces and identify needle-like regions corresponding to the ground truth values of key physical parameters. BIAS is scalable to complex systems and has been used to infer eight underlying parameters in perovskite solar cell stacks with a speedup of 4800× compared to conventional Bayesian inference methods. Its rapid and robust inference capabilities make it suitable for integration into high-throughput fabrication workflows, enabling real-time feedback that links process variations to changes in material properties and their impact on device performance. By embedding BIAS in high-throughput fabrication cycles, researchers can accelerate the transition from novel materials to devices and obtain real-time insight into how novel material properties translate in the context of a device, and the root cause of performance limitations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Epps, R. W. et al. Artificial chemist: an autonomous quantum dot synthesis bot. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001626 (2020).10.1002/adma.202001626 ↗
2. Ismail, M. et al. ADEL: an automated drop-cast electrode setup for high-throughput screening of battery materials. Digit. Discov. 4, 943–953 (2025).10.1039/D4DD00381K ↗
3. Wang, T. et al. Sustainable materials acceleration platform reveals stable and efficient wide-bandgap metal halide perovskite alloys. Matter 6, 2963–2986 (2023).10.1016/j.matt.2023.06.040 ↗
4. Siemenn, A. E. et al. Archerfish: a retrofitted 3D printer for high-throughput combinatorial experimentation via continuous printing. Digit. Discov. 4, 896–909 (2025).10.1039/D4DD00249K ↗
5. Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w ↗
6. Zhang, J., Hauch, J. A. & Brabec, C. J. Toward self-driven autonomous material and device acceleration platforms (AMADAP) for emerging photovoltaics technologies. Acc. Chem. Res. 57, 1434–1445 (2024).10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00095 ↗
7. Zuo, C. & Ding, L. Drop-casting to make efficient perovskite solar cells under high humidity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 11242–11246 (2021).10.1002/anie.202101868 ↗
8. Xiao, H., Zuo, C., Liu, F. & Ding, L. Drop-coating produces efficient CsPbI2Br solar cells. J. Semicond. 42, 050502 (2021).10.1088/1674-4926/42/5/050502 ↗
9. Sánchez-Díaz, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, X., Córcoles-Guija, L., Mora-Martín, G. & Campoy-Quiles, M. High-throughput multiparametric screening of solution processed bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Electron. Mater. 4, 1700477 (2018).10.1002/aelm.201700477 ↗
10. Um, M. et al. Tailoring molecular space to navigate phase complexity in Cs-based quasi-2d perovskites via gated-gaussian-driven high-throughput discovery. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2404655 (2025).10.1002/aenm.202404655 ↗
11. Nandishwara, K. M. et al. Data-driven microstructural optimization of Ag-Bi-I perovskite-inspired materials. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 210 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01701-7 ↗
12. Sun, S. et al. Accelerated development of perovskite-inspired materials via high-throughput synthesis and machine-learning diagnosis. Joule 3, 1437–1451 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.014 ↗
13. Sun, S. et al. A physical data fusion approach to optimize compositional stability of halide perovskites. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.12601997.v2 (2020).10.26434/chemrxiv.12601997.v2 ↗
14. Perales, V. M. et al. Accelerating electrolyte discovery for sodium-metal batteries with high-throughput and active learning approaches. ECS Meet. Abstr. MA2025-02, 784 (2025).10.1149/MA2025-025784mtgabs ↗
15. Stolberg, M. A. et al. A data-driven platform for automated characterization of polymer electrolytes. Matter 8, 102129 (2025).10.1016/j.matt.2025.102129 ↗
16. Pablo-García, S. et al. An affordable platform for automated synthesis and electrochemical characterization. Device 3, 100567 (2025).10.1016/j.device.2024.100567 ↗
17. Deng, T. et al. Discovery of high-performance thermoelectric copper chalcogenide using modified diffusion-couple high-throughput synthesis and automated histogram analysis technique. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 3041–3053 (2020).10.1039/D0EE02209H ↗
18. Ortiz, B. R., Adamczyk, J. M., Gordiz, K., Braden, T. & Toberer, E. S. Towards the high-throughput synthesis of bulk materials: thermoelectric PbTe–PbSe–SnTe–SnSe alloys. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 4, 407–420 (2019).10.1039/C8ME00073E ↗
19. Jha, P. et al. Photo-induced bandgap engineering of metal halide perovskite quantum dots in flow. Adv. Mater. 37, 2419668 (2025).10.1002/adma.202419668 ↗
20. Wu, J. et al. Inverse design workflow discovers hole-transport materials tailored for perovskite solar cells. Science 386, 1256–1264.10.1126/science.ads0901 ↗
21. Kirchartz, T. Challenges and opportunities for the characterization of electronic properties in halide perovskite solar cells. Chem. Sci. 16, 8153–8195 (2025).10.1039/D5SC00504C ↗
22. Kirchartz, T. & Das, B. Transforming characterization data into information in the case of perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Energy 5, 031001 (2023).10.1088/2515-7655/ace07b ↗
23. Wang, Y., Hüpkes, J., Ravishankar, S., Klingebiel, B. & Kirchartz, T. Loss analysis of halide-perovskite solar cells deposited on textured substrates. Sol. RRL 9, 2400829 (2025).10.1002/solr.202400829 ↗
24. Krückemeier, L., Krogmeier, B., Liu, Z., Rau, U. & Kirchartz, T. Understanding transient photoluminescence in halide perovskite layer stacks and solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003489 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202003489 ↗
25. i-MEET/boar. i-MEET https://pypi.org/project/boar-pv/ (2024).
26. Brandt, R. E. et al. Rapid photovoltaic device characterization through Bayesian parameter estimation. Joule 1, 843–856 (2017).10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.001 ↗
27. Kurchin, R., Romano, G. & Buonassisi, T. Bayesim: a tool for adaptive grid model fitting with Bayesian inference. Comput. Phys. Commun. 239, 161–165 (2019).10.1016/j.cpc.2019.01.022 ↗
28. Kurchin, R. et al. How much physics is in a current–voltage curve? Inferring defect properties from photovoltaic device measurements. IEEE J. Photovolt. 10, 1532–1537 (2020).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3010105 ↗
29. Ren, Z. et al. Embedding physics domain knowledge into a Bayesian network enables layer-by-layer process innovation for photovoltaics. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 199 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0277-x ↗
30. Kupfer, C. et al. Unravelling material properties of halide perovskites by combined microwave photoconductivity and time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy. J. Mater. Chem. C. 12, 95–102 (2023).10.1039/D3TC03867J ↗
31. Fai, C., Hages, C. J. & Ladd, A. J. C. Rapid optoelectronic characterization of semiconductors by combining Bayesian inference with metropolis sampling. PRX Energy 2, 033013 (2023).10.1103/PRXEnergy.2.033013 ↗
32. Sun, J. et al. Towards Fast Bayesian inference of equivalent circuit parameters of perovskite solar cell. Sol. Energy 288, 113308 (2025).10.1016/j.solener.2025.113308 ↗
33. McCallum, S. G. et al. Bayesian parameter estimation for characterising mobile ion vacancies in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Energy 6, 015005 (2023).10.1088/2515-7655/ad0a38 ↗
34. Zhan, H. et al. Physics-based extraction of material parameters from perovskite experiments via Bayesian optimization. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 4735–4745 (2024).10.1039/D4EE00911H ↗
35. Zhao, X. et al. Accelerating device characterization in perovskite solar cells via neural network approach. Appl. Energy 392, 125922 (2025).10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125922 ↗
36. McCallum, S. G., Lerpinière, J. E., Jensen, K. O., Friederich, P. & Walker, A. B. Bayesian optimization approach to quantify the effect of input parameter uncertainty on predictions of numerical physics simulations. APL Mach. Learn. 1, 046106 (2023).10.1063/5.0151747 ↗
37. Kober-Czerny, M. et al. Determining Parameters of Metal-Halide Perovskites Using Photoluminescence with Bayesian Inference. PRX Energy 4, 013001 (2025).10.1103/PRXEnergy.4.013001 ↗
38. Le Corre, V. M., Sherkar, T. S., Koopmans, M. & Koster, L. J. A. Identification of the dominant recombination process for perovskite solar cells based on machine learning. Cell Repo. Phys. Sci. 2, 100346 (2021).10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100346 ↗
39. Sadeghi, M. A., Zhang, R. & Hattrick-Simpers, J. AutoEIS: automated equivalent circuit modeling from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy data using statistical machine learning. J. Open Source Softw. 10, 6256 (2025).10.21105/joss.06256 ↗
40. Kurchin, R. C. et al. How much physics is in a current–voltage curve? Inferring defect properties from photovoltaic device measurements. IEEE J. Photovolt. 10, 1532–1537 (2020).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3010105 ↗
41. Kennedy, M. C. & O’Hagan, A. Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B 63, 425–464 (2001).10.1111/1467-9868.00294 ↗
42. Yan, L. & Zhou, T. Adaptive multi-fidelity polynomial chaos approach to Bayesian inference in inverse problems. J. Comput. Phys. 381, 110–128 (2019).10.1016/j.jcp.2018.12.025 ↗
43. Giannoukou, K., Marelli, S. & Sudret, B. Uncertainty-aware multifidelity surrogate modeling with noisy data. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. A. 11, 04025037 (2025).10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1441 ↗
44. Fare, C., Fenner, P., Benatan, M., Varsi, A. & Pyzer-Knapp, E. O. A multi-fidelity machine learning approach to high throughput materials screening. npj Comput Mater. 8, 257 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00947-9 ↗
45. Acerbi, L. Variational Bayesian Monte Carlo with noisy likelihoods. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 8211–8222 (2020).
46. Omidshafiei, S., Lopez, B. T., How, J. P. & Vian, J. Hierarchical Bayesian Noise inference for robust real-time probabilistic object classification. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.01042 (2016).10.48550/arXiv.1605.01042 ↗
47. Bishop, C. M. & Qazaz, C. S. Bayesian inference of noise levels in regression. In Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 96 (eds von der Malsburg, C., von Seelen, W., Vorbrüggen, J. C. & Sendhoff, B.) 59–64 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996).10.1007/3-540-61510-5_14 ↗
48. Liu, X., De Breuck, P.-P., Wang, L. & Rignanese, G.-M. A simple denoising approach to exploit multi-fidelity data for machine learning materials properties. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 233 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00925-1 ↗
49. Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC Hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306–312 (2013).10.1086/670067 ↗
50. Silverman, B. W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Routledge, 2018).10.1201/9781315140919 ↗
51. Waskom, M. L. seaborn: statistical data visualization. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3021 (2021).10.21105/joss.03021 ↗
52. Cover, T. M. & Thomas, J. A. Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, 2006).10.1002/047174882X ↗
53. emcee — Emcee. https://emcee.readthedocs.io/en/stable/.
54. Goodman, J. & Weare, J. Ensemble samplers with affine invariance. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 5, 65–80 (2010).10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 ↗
55. Advanced Numerical Simulation Tool for Solar Cells - ASA5. In 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion 1513–1516 (IEEE, 2006).10.1109/WCPEC.2006.279758 ↗
56. Schropp, R. E. I. Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Solar Cells: Modeling, Materials and Device Technology. (Springer, 1998).10.1007/978-1-4615-5631-2 ↗
57. Foreman-Mackey, D. Autocorrelation analysis & convergence. emcee: The MCMC Hammer https://emcee.readthedocs.io/en/stable/tutorials/autocorr/ (2021).
58. Kirchartz, T. et al. The state of the art in photovoltaic materials and device research. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 335–354 (2025).10.1038/s41578-025-00784-4 ↗
59. deQuilettes, D. W. et al. Reduced recombination via tunable surface fields in perovskite thin films. Nat. Energy 9, 457–466 (2024).10.1038/s41560-024-01470-5 ↗
60. Park, N.-G. & Zhu, K. Scalable fabrication and coating methods for perovskite solar cells and solar modules. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 333–350 (2020).10.1038/s41578-019-0176-2 ↗
61. Braly, I. L. et al. Hybrid perovskite films approaching the radiative limit with over 90% photoluminescence quantum efficiency. Nat. Photon 12, 355–361 (2018).10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z ↗
62. Brenes, R. et al. Metal halide perovskite polycrystalline films exhibiting properties of single crystals. Joule 1, 155–167 (2017).10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.006 ↗
63. Siekmann, J., Ravishankar, S. & Kirchartz, T. ApparEnt defect densities in halide perovskite thin films and single crystals. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 3244–3251 (2021).10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01449 ↗
64. Suchan, K. et al. Rationalizing performance losses of wide bandgap perovskite solar cells evident in data from the Perovskite Database. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2303420 (2024).10.29363/nanoge.hopv.2024.125 ↗
65. Altermatt, P. P. Models for numerical device simulations of crystalline silicon solar cells—a review. J. Comput. Electron. 10, 314–330 (2011).10.1007/s10825-011-0367-6 ↗
66. Cover, T. M. & Thomas, J. A. Elements of Information Theory 2nd edn, Ch. 2 (Wiley, 2006).