journal article·2021-06-17Open access

First-principles prediction of electronic transport in fabricated semiconductor heterostructures via physics-aware machine learning

Artem K. Pimachev, Sanghamitra Neogi

npj Computational Materials· Volume 7· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract First-principles techniques for electronic transport property prediction have seen rapid progress in recent years. However, it remains a challenge to predict properties of heterostructures incorporating fabrication-dependent variability. Machine-learning (ML) approaches are increasingly being used to accelerate design and discovery of new materials with targeted properties, and extend the applicability of first-principles techniques to larger systems. However, few studies exploited ML techniques to characterize relationships between local atomic structures and global electronic transport coefficients. In this work, we propose an electronic-transport-informatics (ETI) framework that trains on ab initio models of small systems and predicts thermopower of fabricated silicon/germanium heterostructures, matching measured data. We demonstrate application of ML approaches to extract important physics that determines electronic transport in semiconductor heterostructures, and bridge the gap between ab initio accessible models and fabricated systems. We anticipate that ETI framework would have broad applicability to diverse materials classes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Thermal properties of materials · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. Alferov, Z. I. Nobel lecture: the double heterostructure concept and its applications in physics, electronics, and technology. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 767 (2001).10.1103/RevModPhys.73.767 ↗
2. Thompson, S. E. et al. A 90-nm logic technology featuring strained-silicon. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51, 1790–1797 (2004).10.1109/TED.2004.836648 ↗
3. Meyerson, B. S. High-speed silicon-germanium electronics. Sci. Am. 270, 62–67 (1994).10.1038/scientificamerican0394-62 ↗
4. Nissim, Y. & Rosencher, E. Heterostructures on Silicon: One Step Further with Silicon, Vol. 160 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
5. Paul, D. J. Si/SiGe heterostructures: from material and physics to devices and circuits. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, R75 (2004).10.1088/0268-1242/19/10/R02 ↗
6. Koester, S. J., Schaub, J. D., Dehlinger, G. & Chu, J. O. Germanium-on-SOI infrared detectors for integrated photonic applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 12, 1489–1502 (2006).10.1109/JSTQE.2006.883160 ↗
7. Liu, J., Sun, X., Camacho-Aguilera, R., Kimerling, L. C. & Michel, J. Ge-on-Si laser operating at room temperature. Opt. Lett. 35, 679–681 (2010).10.1364/OL.35.000679 ↗
8. Alam, H. & Ramakrishna, S. A review on the enhancement of figure of merit from bulk to nano-thermoelectric materials. Nano Energy 2, 190–212 (2013).10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.10.005 ↗
9. Taniguchi, T. et al. High thermoelectric power factor realization in Si-rich SiGe/Si superlattices by super-controlled interfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c04982 ↗
10. Shi, Z. et al. Tunable singlet-triplet splitting in a few-electron Si/SiGe quantum dot. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 233108 (2011).10.1063/1.3666232 ↗
11. Euaruksakul, C. et al. Heteroepitaxial growth on thin sheets and bulk material: exploring differences in strain relaxation via low-energy electron microscopy. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 025305 (2013).10.1088/0022-3727/47/2/025305 ↗
12. Brehm, M. & Grydlik, M. Site-controlled and advanced epitaxial Ge/Si quantum dots: fabrication, properties, and applications. Nanotechnology 28, 392001 (2017).10.1088/1361-6528/aa8143 ↗
13. Lee, C. et al. Interplay of strain and intermixing effects on direct-bandgap optical transition in strained Ge-on-Si under thermal annealing. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 ↗
14. Chen, P. et al. Role of surface-segregation-driven intermixing on the thermal transport through planar Si/Ge superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 115901 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.115901 ↗
15. David, T. et al. New strategies for producing defect free SiGe strained nanolayers. Sci. Rep. 8, 2891 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-21299-9 ↗
16. Samarelli, A. et al. The thermoelectric properties of Ge/SiGe modulation doped superlattices. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 233704 (2013).10.1063/1.4811228 ↗
17. Koga, T., Cronin, S., Dresselhaus, M., Liu, J. & Wang, K. Experimental proof-of-principle investigation of enhanced Z3DT in (001) oriented Si/Ge superlattices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1490–1492 (2000).10.1063/1.1308271 ↗
18. Watling, J. R. & Paul, D. J. A study of the impact of dislocations on the thermoelectric properties of quantum wells in the Si/SiGe materials system. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 114508 (2011).10.1063/1.3665127 ↗
19. Vargiamidis, V. & Neophytou, N. Hierarchical nanostructuring approaches for thermoelectric materials with high power factors. Phys. Rev. B 99, 045405 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.045405 ↗
20. Snyder, J. C., Rupp, M., Hansen, K., Müller, K.-R. & Burke, K. Finding density functionals with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 253002 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.253002 ↗
21. Behler, J. Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).10.1063/1.4966192 ↗
22. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 1–13 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
23. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 1–7 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
24. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094104 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094104 ↗
25. Jain, A., Shin, Y. & Persson, K. A. Computational predictions of energy materials using density functional theory. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–13 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2015.4 ↗
26. Wang, T., Zhang, C., Snoussi, H. & Zhang, G. Machine learning approaches for thermoelectric materials research. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1906041 (2020).10.1002/adfm.201906041 ↗
27. Gaultois, M. W. et al. Perspective: web-based machine learning models for real-time screening of thermoelectric materials properties. APL Mater. 4, 053213 (2016).10.1063/1.4952607 ↗
28. Jain, A. et al. The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
29. Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. The NOMAD laboratory: from data sharing to artificial intelligence. J. Phys. Mater. 2, 036001 (2019).10.1088/2515-7639/ab13bb ↗
30. Gaultois, M. W. et al. Data-driven review of thermoelectric materials: performance and resource considerations. Chem. Mater. 25, 2911–2920 (2013).10.1021/cm400893e ↗
31. Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M. & Fazzio, A. From dft to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review. J. Phys. Mater. 2, 032001 (2019).10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
32. Xie, T., France-Lanord, A., Wang, Y., Shao-Horn, Y. & Grossman, J. C. Graph dynamical networks for unsupervised learning of atomic scale dynamics in materials. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10663-6 ↗
33. Nye, J. F. et al. Physical properties of crystals: their representation by tensors and matrices (Oxford University Press, 1985).
34. Proshchenko, V. S., Settipalli, M. & Neogi, S. Optimization of Seebeck coefficients of strain-symmetrized semiconductor heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 211602 (2019).10.1063/1.5123294 ↗
35. Proshchenko, V. S., Settipalli, M., Pimachev, A. K. & Neogi, S. Role of substrate strain to tune energy bands–seebeck relationship in semiconductor heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 129, 025301 (2021).10.1063/5.0031523 ↗
36. Settipalli, M. & Neogi, S. Theoretical prediction of enhanced thermopower in n-doped si/ge superlattices using effective mass approximation. J. Electron. Mater. 49, 4431–4442 (2020).10.1007/s11664-020-08136-4 ↗
37. Hinsche, N., Mertig, I. & Zahn, P. Thermoelectric transport in strained Si and Si/Ge heterostructures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 24, 275501 (2012).10.1088/0953-8984/24/27/275501 ↗
38. Peter, Y. & Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties (Springer Science & Business Media, 2010).
39. Ridley, B. Quantum Processes in Semiconductors (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).
40. Schäffler, F. High-mobility Si and Ge structures. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12, 1515 (1997).10.1088/0268-1242/12/12/001 ↗
41. Proshchenko, V. S., Dholabhai, P. P., Sterling, T. C. & Neogi, S. Heat and charge transport in bulk semiconductors with interstitial defects. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014207 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014207 ↗
42. Ward, L. et al. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via voronoi tessellations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 024104 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024104 ↗
43. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
44. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
45. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Hierarchical visualization of materials space with graph convolutional neural networks. J. Chem. Phys. 149, 174111 (2018).10.1063/1.5047803 ↗
46. Gong, S. et al. Predicting charge density distribution of materials using a local-environment-based graph convolutional network. Phys. Rev. B 100, 184103 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184103 ↗
47. Cowley, J. An approximate theory of order in alloys. Phys. Rev. 77, 669 (1950).10.1103/PhysRev.77.669 ↗
48. Wen, C.-Y., Reuter, M. C., Su, D., Stach, E. A. & Ross, F. M. Strain and stability of ultrathin Ge layers in Si/Ge/Si axial heterojunction nanowires. Nano Lett. 15, 1654–1659 (2015).10.1021/nl504241g ↗
49. Gupta, G., Rajasekharan, B. & Hueting, R. J. Electrostatic doping in semiconductor devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 64, 3044–3055 (2017).10.1109/TED.2017.2712761 ↗
50. Mahan, G. & Sofo, J. O. The best thermoelectric. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7436–7439 (1996).10.1073/pnas.93.15.7436 ↗
51. Popescu, V. & Zunger, A. Extracting E versus $$\overrightarrow{k}$$ effective band structure from supercell calculations on alloys and impurities. Phys. Rev. B 85, 085201 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085201 ↗
52. Boykin, T. B., Kharche, N., Klimeck, G. & Korkusinski, M. Approximate bandstructures of semiconductor alloys from tight-binding supercell calculations. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 036203 (2007).
53. Yang, B., Liu, J., Wang, K. & Chen, G. Characterization of cross-plane thermoelectric properties of Si/Ge superlattices. In Proceedings ICT2001. 20 International Conference on Thermoelectrics (Cat. No. 01TH8589), 344–347 (IEEE, 2001).
54. Dismukes, J., Ekstrom, L., Steigmeier, E., Kudman, I. & Beers, D. Thermal and electrical properties of heavily doped Ge-Si alloys up to 1300 K. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2899–2907 (1964).10.1063/1.1713126 ↗
55. Zhang, Y. et al. Measurement of Seebeck coefficient perpendicular to SiGe superlattice. In Thermoelectrics, 2002. In Proceedings ICT’02. Twenty-First International Conference on, 329–332 (IEEE, 2002).
56. Pearsall, T. P. Strained-Layer Superlattices: Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 33 (Academic Press, 1991).
57. Manasreh, M. O., Pantelides, S. T. & Zollner, S. Optoelectronic Properties of Semiconductors and Superlattices, Vol. 15 (Taylor & Francis Books, INC, 1991).
58. Van de Walle, C. G. & Martin, R. M. Theoretical calculations of heterojunction discontinuities in the Si/Ge system. Phys. Rev. B 34, 5621 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5621 ↗
59. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
60. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
61. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
62. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
63. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
64. Hybertsen, M. S. & Schlüter, M. Theory of optical transitions in Si/Ge (001) strained-layer superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 36, 9683 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.36.9683 ↗
65. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
66. Ziman, J. M. Electrons and Phonons: the Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids (Oxford University Press, 1960).
67. Madsen, G. K. & Singh, D. J. BoltzTraP. a code for calculating band-structure dependent quantities. Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 67–71 (2006).10.1016/j.cpc.2006.03.007 ↗
68. Chollet, F. et al. Keras (Internet) (GitHub, 2015). https://github.com/fchollet/keras.
69. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
70. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
71. Wang, L.-W., Bellaiche, L., Wei, S.-H. & Zunger, A. "majority representation” of alloy electronic states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4725 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4725 ↗
72. Perdew, J. P. et al. Understanding band gaps of solids in generalized Kohn–Sham theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2801–2806 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1621352114 ↗
73. Morales-García, Á., Valero, R. & Illas, F. An empirical, yet practical way to predict the band gap in solids by using density functional band structure calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 18862–18866 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07421 ↗
74. Hummer, K., Harl, J. & Kresse, G. Heyd-scuseria-ernzerhof hybrid functional for calculating the lattice dynamics of semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 80, 115205 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115205 ↗
75. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).10.1063/1.1564060 ↗
76. Dziekan, T., Zahn, P., Meded, V. & Mirbt, S. Theoretical calculations of mobility enhancement in strained silicon. Phys. Rev. B 75, 195213 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.195213 ↗
77. Cuantam lab - github repository. https://github.com/CUANTAM.