MFFN: Multiscale Feature Fusion Network with Pruning for photovoltaic cell anomaly detection
Source abstract
Abstract
The accurate detection of surface defects on photovoltaic (PV) cell is the pivot of ensuring the stable operation of solar power systems. However, this task remains challenging due to the diversity in defect sizes and the complexity of the background environment. This article proposes a novel deep learning approach for PV cell surface defect detection based on a Multiscale Feature Fusion Network with Pruning (MFFN). To enhance feature representation capabilities, an innovative backbone network architecture referred to as the Feature Fusion Pruning Efficient Multi-Scale Attention (FFPEMA) network is introduced. The dilated convolutional content-aware reassembly of features (DCCARAFE) module is designed to enhance the flexibility of feature extraction. Furthermore, an efficient adaptive feature integration strategy is proposed to strengthen the model’s ability to extract and learn features across different defect scales. The experimental results show that the average accuracy of the method proposed in this paper on the PV-elad dataset has increased by 2.5%, and it also performs well in the small object detection task.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Image Processing Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Anhui University of Technology
Funding
Key Natural Science Foundation of Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province · Project of Anhui International Joint Research Center for Metallurgical Process and System Science, Anhui University of Technology
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11512110.1016/j.measurement.2024.115121 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2024.231926310.1080/10589759.2024.2319263 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.10110.1016/j.rser.2014.11.101 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11216010.1016/j.rser.2022.112160 ↗
5. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245667310.1080/10589759.2025.2456673 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solener.2023.11218610.1016/j.solener.2023.112186 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10637510.1016/j.jobe.2023.106375 ↗
8. 10.1109/CVPR.2001.99051710.1109/CVPR.2001.990517 ↗
9. Navneet D. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: International Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition. San Diego, USA; 2005. Vol. 2. p. 886–893.
10. 10.1006/jcss.1997.150410.1006/jcss.1997.1504 ↗
11. 10.3182/20130902-3-CN-3020.0004410.3182/20130902-3-CN-3020.00044 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.12218410.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122184 ↗
13. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9110.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_210.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
15. Ross T-Y, Dollár G. Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Venice, Italy; 2017. p. 2980–2988.
16. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.8110.1109/CVPR.2014.81 ↗
17. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
18. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242253010.1080/10589759.2024.2422530 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.12403310.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124033 ↗
20. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240289010.1080/10589759.2024.2402890 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41598-024-69722-810.1038/s41598-024-69722-8 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41598-024-67953-310.1038/s41598-024-67953-3 ↗
23. 10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.0072110.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 ↗
24. 10.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.1009651610.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.10096516 ↗
25. 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.0135010.1109/CVPR46437.2021.01350 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compag.2020.10521410.1016/j.compag.2020.105214 ↗
27. 10.1109/TPAMI.2023.333461410.1109/TPAMI.2023.3334614 ↗
28. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.0115210.1109/CVPR.2019.01152 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.inffus.2025.10303910.1016/j.inffus.2025.103039 ↗
30. 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.342081810.1109/TNNLS.2024.3420818 ↗
31. 10.32604/cmc.2024.05806310.32604/cmc.2024.058063 ↗
32. 10.1155/int/178049910.1155/int/1780499 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.10937310.1016/j.patcog.2023.109373 ↗
34. 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.0009510.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00095 ↗
35. 10.1145/353337810.1145/3533378 ↗
36. 10.1109/TCSVT.2021.305672510.1109/TCSVT.2021.3056725 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.02610.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.026 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.10222010.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102220 ↗
39. 10.1073/pnas.200254511710.1073/pnas.2002545117 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solener.2023.11220710.1016/j.solener.2023.112207 ↗
41. Ming K, Wang J, Wei B, et al. Pv-elad: a benchmark dataset for photovoltaic cell anomaly detection. J Renewable Energy. 2021;180:1620–1635.
42. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2019;32: 8026–8037.
43. 10.32604/cmc.2023.04141910.32604/cmc.2023.041419 ↗
44. 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.0107910.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01079 ↗
45. 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.0160510.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_110.1007/978-3-031-72751-1_1 ↗
47. 10.52202/079017-342910.52202/079017-3429 ↗
48. 10.1109/CCDC65474.2025.1109097310.1109/CCDC65474.2025.11090973 ↗
49. Tian Y Ye Q Doermann D. Yolov12: attention-centric real-time object detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12524. 2025.