Influence of Mg doping on the structural, optical, and electrical properties of Zn 0.95 Li 0.05 O Nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the effect of Li and Mg codoping on the structural, optical, and electrical properties of the ZnO. Zn 0.95− x L i 0.05 Mg x O ( x = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03) nanoparticles are synthesized by hydrothermal method. X‐ray diffraction ( XRD ) results confirmed that all samples are polycrystalline with a hexagonal‐wurtzite structure. The surface morphology of the samples were examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy ( SEM ). The SEM analysis showed that all samples exhibit cheese‐like plates and the plate sizes increase with Mg addition. Optical properties were examined by UV ‐ VIS diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. The optical measurements indicate that the reflectance edge of the samples have red shift up to 2% Mg doping level, but blue‐shift for 3% Mg doping. The optical band gap of Zn 0.95− x L i 0.05 Mg x O nanostructures are calculated as 3.227, 3.214, 3.209, and 3.221 eV with x = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02, 0.03 respectively. Electrical properties including the carrier concentration, Hall mobility, and resistivity were studied using Van‐der Pauw method. The temperature resistivity curves of the samples shown typical semiconductor behavior. The carrier concentration decreases with increasing doping level up to 2% Mg, and it slightly increases for 3% Mg. The variation of the Hall mobility for the samples is inversely proportional to the carrier concentration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Bolu Turkey
Funding
Abant Izzet Baysal Üniversitesi
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.199266610.1063/1.1992666 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.304672610.1063/1.3046726 ↗
3. 10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/12650110.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501 ↗
4. 10.1039/c2ce06650e10.1039/c2ce06650e ↗
5. 10.2109/jcersj2.1620210.2109/jcersj2.16202 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.05.06510.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.05.065 ↗
7. 10.1002/pssa.20102644810.1002/pssa.201026448 ↗
8. 10.1088/0031-8949/90/2/02580610.1088/0031-8949/90/2/025806 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.02410.1016/j.msea.2013.10.024 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.09.05810.1016/j.jallcom.2011.09.058 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00182-010.1016/S0955-2219(01)00182-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.00610.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.spmi.2011.03.00510.1016/j.spmi.2011.03.005 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.350593010.1063/1.3505930 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.08110.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.10.081 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.22710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.227 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.06910.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.069 ↗
18. 10.1088/1468-6996/10/1/01300110.1088/1468-6996/10/1/013001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.16010.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.160 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.11110.1016/j.jallcom.2009.03.111 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRev.93.63210.1103/PhysRev.93.632 ↗