journal article·2019-01

Relationship between sintering methods and physical properties of the low positive thermal expansion material Al 2 W 3 O 12

Luciana P. Prisco, Mayara Marzano, Patricia I. Pontón, Antonio M. L. M. Costa, Celio A. da Costa Neto, Greg Sweet, Carl P. Romao, Mary Anne White, Bojan A. Marinkovic

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ceramic materials from the A 2 M 3 O 12 family with near‐zero thermal expansion are good candidates for applications requiring high thermal shock resistance. Considering their inherently low thermal conductivity, the bulk forms of A 2 M 3 O 12 have to present Young's moduli and mechanical strength close to 100 GP a and 100 MP a, respectively, in order to compete with the state‐of‐the‐art materials used to avoid thermal shock. The relationship between sintering, microstructure, and physical properties within the A 2 M 3 O 12 family is generally unknown while the preparation of bulks with high mechanical resistance remains a great challenge. Bulk samples of dense Al 2 W 3 O 12 (96% TD ) have been obtained by pressureless three‐stage sintering ( TSS ) and spark plasma sintering ( SPS ). The Young's moduli and hardness of samples prepared by SPS were 50% higher than that measured for TSS samples and more than 100% in comparison to the Al 2 W 3 O 12 bulk (91% TD ). UV ‐Vis spectroscopy confirmed that A 2 M 3 O 12 phases are wide band‐gap semiconductors (3.11 eV ). When prepared by SPS , black Al 2 W 3 O 12 absorbed light within the visible spectrum due to the introduction of donor sites within the band‐gap. No enhancement of the mechanism causing negative thermal expansion was observed for black Al 2 W 3 O 12 . The mechanical properties achieved were significantly improved over those previously reported in literature for Al 2 W 3 O 12 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Department of Materials New Materials Laboratory Escuela Politécnica Nacional Quito Ecuador

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering COPPE/UFRJ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Department of Chemistry Clean Technology Research Institute Dalhousie University Halifax NS Canada

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10853-012-6548-210.1007/s10853-012-6548-2 ↗
2. 10.1111/jace.1416010.1111/jace.14160 ↗
3. CB Carter MG Norton 2007 Springer New York NY 712
4. 10.1038/3500454810.1038/35004548 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03117.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb03117.x ↗
6. 10.5772/3361610.5772/33616 ↗
7. 10.1080/0371750X.2007.1101227110.1080/0371750X.2007.11012271 ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00425-310.1016/B978-0-08-097774-4.00425-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.045 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.04810.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.048 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.07.02010.1016/j.materresbull.2009.07.020 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02787.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02787.x ↗
13. 10.1111/ijac.1220110.1111/ijac.12201 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.021 ↗
17. 10.1590/S0366-6913200700010000910.1590/S0366-69132007000100009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.00810.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/0025-5408(83)90147-210.1016/0025-5408(83)90147-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.10.00810.1016/j.jssc.2008.10.008 ↗
21. Enhanced negative thermal expansion and optical absorption of In0.6(HfMg)0.7Mo3O12 with oxygen vacancies
22. 10.1006/jssc.1999.850210.1006/jssc.1999.8502 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00771-510.1016/S0022-0248(00)00771-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.03010.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.030 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.14110.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.141 ↗
26. 10.1166/jnn.2017.1306410.1166/jnn.2017.13064 ↗
27. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000025832.93840.b010.1023/B:JMSC.0000025832.93840.b0 ↗
28. 10.1155/2017/362091010.1155/2017/3620910 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1973.tb12428.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1973.tb12428.x ↗
30. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06091.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06091.x ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04071.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04071.x ↗
32. 10.1007/s10853-012-7076-910.1007/s10853-012-7076-9 ↗
33. 10.1039/C6CP06356J10.1039/C6CP06356J ↗
34. 10.1063/1.294666510.1063/1.2946665 ↗
35. 10.1039/c0cs00163e10.1039/c0cs00163e ↗
36. Relationship between mechanical strength and Young's modulus in traditional ceramics
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.07610.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.076 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20160181610.1002/adma.201601816 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.06610.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.066 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.02430510.1103/PhysRevB.90.024305 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10971-015-3775-410.1007/s10971-015-3775-4 ↗
42. 10.1039/C4CS00330F10.1039/C4CS00330F ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0042910.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00429 ↗
44. 10.1039/C6RA21136D10.1039/C6RA21136D ↗
45. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb07737.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb07737.x ↗
46. 10.1557/jmr.2016.32910.1557/jmr.2016.329 ↗