Epoxy adhesive behaviour on ceramic surfaces in commercial optoelectronic assemblies
Source abstract
Abstract
Chemical and physical variability in the as-received state of aluminium oxide and aluminium nitride ceramic substrate materials used in optoelectronic modules currently leads to a process yield less than 100% when adhesives are used for assembly and interconnection. The phenomenon of epoxy bleed is a contributing factor to this yield and steps are not yet taken in the industry to control or inhibit the undesirable wetting. Standard surface texture measurement techniques, XPS and contact angle measurements were implemented to characterise and compare commercial as-received samples. The quality controls currently in place are assessed and additional analysis methods in the QC stage are suggested for increasing yield. Commercially available conductive and thermally conductive adhesives, also used in optoelectronic module manufacture, were studied along with the surfaces. In this work the surface property measurements, wetting observations and shear failure modes are compared and discussed. It was found that varying as-received surface properties did not affect adhesion strength between the adhesives and ceramics enough to induce an undesirable failure mode, although epoxy bleed distance varies dramatically with varying surface conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Hall J, Edge C, Randle F, Pope S, Fraser J, Loosley J, et al. Integrated tunable transmitters for 10Gb/s long-haul DWDM applications. In: 53rd electronic components and technology conference, New Orleans, 27–30 May 2003, p. 796–800.10.1109/ECTC.2003.1216377 ↗
2. Surface roughness and contact angle10.1021/j150474a015 ↗
3. A surface energy approach for analyzing die attach adhesive resin bleed10.1163/15685610360472402 ↗
4. Elimination of epoxy resin bleed through thin film plasma deposition
5. Brewis · 1982
6. Pocius · 2002
7. Lawrence J (Jonathan), Li L (Lin). Laser modification of the wettability characteristics of engineering materials. London: Professional Engineering; 2001.
8. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
9. White-light interferometry on rough surfaces—measurement uncertainty caused by surface roughness10.1364/AO.47.002941 ↗
10. Contrast mechanisms of secondary electron images in scanning electron and ion microscopy10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00773-9 ↗
11. The surface energy of quasi-amorphous [gamma] alumina calculated from the temperature of the [gamma]—>[alpha] transition10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.08.012 ↗
12. Starov VM, Velarde, Manuel G (Manuel García). Wetting and spreading dynamics. Boca Raton, FL, London: CRC/Taylor & Francis; 2007.10.1201/9781420016178 ↗