Comments on Raman Spectra of SrTi18O3: Imperfect Softening and Intrinsic Inhomogeneity of the Ferroelectric Phase
Source abstract
Abstract
A peculiar nature of the ferroelectric phase transition of isotope exchanged SrTi 18 O 3 (STO18) are discussed by comparing three independent Raman studies which have been recently published. The results reported in a paper by the present authors (Phys.Rev. B 74, 174121 (2006)) are quite different from others as follows: (a) Contrary to the report by Takesada et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 227602 (2006)), the perfect softening does not take place. Instead, a quasi-elastic mode appears near T c indicating the order-disorder nature of STO18; (b) Contrary to the report by Taniguchi et al. (Phys.Rev.Lett. 99 , 017602 (2007)), the ferroelectric phase of STO18 is intrinsically inhomogeneous regardless of the isotope concentration. By comparison, it is shown that the conclusions in the latter two papers are not the case. The reason is that in these papers the spectra for only a single phonon propagation direction K p were measured and analyzed without taking into account the consistency to the spectra for other K p 's. Contrary to other ordinary ferroelectric crystals, the transition in STO18 is peculiar because the ferroelectric domains are generated from the polar nano-region (PNR) and its percolation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.354010.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3540 ↗
2. Itoh M. · Ferroelectrics · 2003 · 85 · 377
3. 10.1080/0015019970801283210.1080/00150199708012832 ↗
4. 10.1143/JPSJ.70.64810.1143/JPSJ.70.648 ↗
5. Abe K. · Ferroelectrics · 2002 · 272 · 15510.1080/713716289 ↗
6. 10.1080/0015019039020586110.1080/00150190390205861 ↗
7. Yamaguchi M. · Phys. Rev. · 2002 · 65 · 17210210.1103/PhysRevB.65.172102 ↗
8. Shigenari T. · Phys. Rev. · 2006 · 74 · 17412110.1103/PhysRevB.74.174121 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22760210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.227602 ↗
10. 10.1080/0015019060118009110.1080/00150190601180091 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.01760210.1103/PhysRevLett.99.017602 ↗
12. Comparison of [8] with [9] has been briefly given on EMF-11, Bled, Slovenia, 2007
13. Zalar B. · Phys. Rev. · 2005 · 71 · 06410710.1103/PhysRevB.71.064107 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.14760110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.147601 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A98110.1103/PhysRev.134.A981 ↗
16. Vogt H. · Phys. Rev. · 1995 · 51 · 804610.1103/PhysRevB.51.8046 ↗
17. From this reason, TO(A1) and TO(B2) and the quasi-elastic mode are also observed in the depolarized (VH) spectra ofKp//Z as shown in Fig. 8(a2) of ref.[8]
18. Effects of the external electric field to the soft mode in STO18 are observed in [6] as the significant upward frequency shift
19. Uwe H. · Phys. Rev. · 1986 · 33 · 643610.1103/PhysRevB.33.6436 ↗
20. The reason why the 5 cm− 1mode is not seen in otherKpdirections is the Raman tensor ZZ is large for FMR in the tetragonal structure but it is small for the soft mode in orthorhombic C2vsymmetry (ZZ in D4hcorresponds to xx, not zz, in C2v. See Tables in [8]). In other directions, large Raman tensors for the soft mode XX or YY (zz in C2v) masks the weak 5 cm− 1mode
21. 10.1143/JPSJ.73.113910.1143/JPSJ.73.1139 ↗
22. 10.1209/epl/i2006-10369-010.1209/epl/i2006-10369-0 ↗
23. 10.1080/0015019890821675810.1080/00150198908216758 ↗
24. This would be also the reason why the strong quasi-elastic mode is observed in the depolarized spectra VH ofKp//Z (see Fig.8 of [8]) since the orientational fluctuations ofPin the XY plane has B2symmetry and it would be as large as the amplitude fluctuations with A1symmetry