Temporary property changes and moisture-driven recovery in thermo-mechanically densified birch and aspen wood
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the moisture-induced recovery of temporary property changes in thermo-mechanically densified (TMD) birch and aspen wood, compared to thermally modified (TM) wood. Both treatments were prepared under identical thermal conditions, differing only by compression in TMD. Dimensional stability, water vapour sorption, and Brinell hardness were assessed before and after repeated wetting and drying cycles to evaluate the effect of stress storage in the polymer matrix and its recovery during moisture exposure. The results indicate that both TMD and TM treatments induce a temporary reduction in moisture uptake, consistent with the formation of an annealed polymer structure. Water saturation and subsequent drying restored higher moisture content and reduced Brinell hardness in TMD wood, highlighting a moisture-driven recovery of the annealed polymer conformation. Notably, the decrease in hardness could not be attributed solely to the reduction in bulk density, indicating additional effects of polymer plasticisation. The presence of compression stresses during TMD appeared to enhance stress storage, thereby influencing the recovery of moisture-induced properties. Initial wood moisture content before TMD had little effect on the temporary reduction in moisture content, suggesting that annealing also occurs in dry states. These findings emphasise the need to account for moisture cycling in TMD wood’s service life. Future work should focus on the interplay between compression stresses and the annealing effect to reduce the temporary nature of the property improvements by TMD.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Altgen M, Militz H (2016) Influence of process conditions on hygroscopicity and mechanical properties of thermally modified wood in a closed reactor system. Holzforschung 70:971–979. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2015-023510.1515/hf-2015-0235 ↗
2. Blomberg J, Persson B, Blomberg A (2005) Effects of semi-isostatic densification of wood on the variation in strength properties with density. Wood Sci Technol 39:339–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-005-0290-810.1007/s00226-005-0290-8 ↗
3. Borrega M, Kärenlampi P (2010) Hygroscopicity of heat-treated Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 68:233–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-009-0371-810.1007/s00107-009-0371-8 ↗
4. Cabral JP, Kafle B, Subhani M et al (2022) Densification of timber: a review on the process, material properties, and application. J Wood Sci 68:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10086-022-02028-310.1186/s10086-022-02028-3 ↗
5. Cai J, Yang Xu, Cai Liping, Shi SQ (2013) Impact of the combination of densification and thermal modification on dimensional stability and hardness of poplar lumber. Dry Technol 31:1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.77514710.1080/07373937.2013.775147 ↗
6. CEN (2020) EN 1534:2020 Wood flooring and parquet-Determination of resistance to indentation - Test method. European Committee for Standardization
7. Doyle J, Walker JCF (1985) Indentation hardness of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 17:369–376
8. Dubois H, Verkasalo E, Claessens H (2020) Potential of birch (Betula pendula Roth and B. pubescens Ehrh.) for forestry and forest-based industry sector within the changing climatic and socio-economic context of Western Europe. Forests 11:336. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1103033610.3390/f11030336 ↗
9. Endo K, Obataya E, Zeniya N, Matsuo M (2016) Effects of heating humidity on the physical properties of hydrothermally treated spruce wood. Wood Sci Technol 50:1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-016-0822-410.1007/s00226-016-0822-4 ↗
10. Götmark F, Fridman J, Kempe G, Norden B (2005) Broadleaved tree species in conifer-dominated forestry: regeneration and limitation of saplings in southern Sweden. Ecol Manage 214:142–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.00110.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.001 ↗
11. Hill C, Ramsay J, Keating B et al (2012) The water vapour sorption properties of thermally modified and densified wood. J Mater Sci 47:3191–3197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6154-810.1007/s10853-011-6154-8 ↗
12. Hill C, Altgen M, Rautkari L (2021) Thermal modification of wood—a review: chemical changes and hygroscopicity. J Mater Sci 56:6581–6614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05722-z10.1007/s10853-020-05722-z ↗
13. Hill C, Altgen M, Penttilӓ P, Rautkari L (2024) Review: interaction of water vapour with wood and other hygro-responsive materials. J Mater Sci 59:7595–7635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09636-y10.1007/s10853-024-09636-y ↗
14. Inoue M, Norimoto M, Tanahashi M, Rowell RM (1993) Steam or heat fixation of compressed wood. Wood Fiber Sci 25:224–235
15. Jones D, Sandberg D, Goli G, Todaro L (2019) Wood modification in Europe: a state-of-the-art about processes, products and applications. Firenze University Press
16. Jones G, Ulan M, Liziniewicz M et al (2024) Relating estimates of wood properties of birch to stem form, age and species. J For Res 35:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01669-410.1007/s11676-023-01669-4 ↗
17. Klüppel A (2016) Instrumented macrohardness testing of wood. Int Wood Prod J 7:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.114213610.1080/20426445.2016.1142136 ↗
18. Klüppel A (2017) Hardness and indentation modulus of resin-treated wood. Int Wood Prod J 8:41–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.126835810.1080/20426445.2016.1268358 ↗
19. Laine K, Segerholm K, Wålinder M et al (2016) Wood densification and thermal modification: hardness, set-recovery and micromorphology. Wood Sci Technol 50:883–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-016-0835-z10.1007/s00226-016-0835-z ↗
20. Luan Y, Fang C-H, Ma Y-F, Fei B-H (2022) Wood mechanical densification: a review on processing. Mater Manuf Process 37:359–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2021.201681610.1080/10426914.2021.2016816 ↗
21. Neyses B, Peeters K, Buck D et al (2021) In-situ penetration of ionic liquids during surface densification of Scots pine. Holzforschung 75:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2020-014610.1515/hf-2020-0146 ↗
22. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
23. Peng H, Jiang J, Zhan T, Lu J (2016) Influence of density and equilibrium moisture content on the hardness anisotropy of wood. Prod J 66:443–452. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-15-0007210.13073/FPJ-D-15-00072 ↗
24. Penttilä PA, Zitting A, Lourençon T et al (2021) Water-accessibility of interfibrillar spaces in spruce wood cell walls. Cellulose 28:11231–11245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04253-310.1007/s10570-021-04253-3 ↗
25. Poncsak S, Kocaefe D, Simard F, Pichette A (2009) Evolution of extractive composition during thermal treatment of Jack pine. J Wood Chem Technol 29:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0277381090292858210.1080/02773810902928582 ↗
26. Rautkari L, Laine K, Kutnar A et al (2013) Hardness and density profile of surface densified and thermally modified Scots pine in relation to degree of densification. J Mater Sci 48:2370–2375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7019-510.1007/s10853-012-7019-5 ↗
27. Scharf A, Neyses B, Sandberg D (2023) Continuous densification of wood with a belt press: the process and properties of the surface-densified wood. Wood Mater Sci Eng 18:1573–1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2023.221666010.1080/17480272.2023.2216660 ↗
28. Schoch W, Heller I, Schweingruber FH, Kienast F (2004) Wood anatomy of central European species. www.woodanatomy.ch. Accessed 11 Aug 2025
29. Schwarzkopf M (2021) Densified wood impregnated with phenol resin for reduced set-recovery. Wood Mater Sci Eng 16:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.172923610.1080/17480272.2020.1729236 ↗
30. Sellman FA, Benselfelt T, Larsson PT, Wågberg L (2023) Hornification of cellulose-rich materials – a kinetically trapped state. Carbohydr Polym 318:121132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12113210.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121132 ↗
31. Thybring EE, Thygesen LG, Burgert I (2017) Hydroxyl accessibility in wood cell walls as affected by drying and re-wetting procedures. Cellulose 24:2375–2384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1278-x10.1007/s10570-017-1278-x ↗
32. Wentzel M, Altgen M, Militz H (2018) Analyzing reversible changes in hygroscopicity of thermally modified eucalypt wood from open and closed reactor systems. Wood Sci Technol 52:889–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1012-310.1007/s00226-018-1012-3 ↗
33. Willems W (2016) Glassy state of wood polymers in native and thermally modified wood: effects on long-term material performance in service. Int Wood Prod J 7:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20426445.2016.116058910.1080/20426445.2016.1160589 ↗
34. Zhang S, Meinhard H, Collins S et al (2024) Effect of ionic liquid [emim][OAc] on the set recovery behavior of densified wood. Cellulose 31:8267–8278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-06043-z10.1007/s10570-024-06043-z ↗