journal article·2008Open access

Phase evolution and ferroelectric behavior in BaTiO3-BiScO3-PbTiO3 ceramics

Zhonghua YAO, Hanxing LIU, Yang LIU, Zhuo LI, Xiangbang CHENG, Minghe CAO, Hua HAO

Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan· Volume 116· Issue 1358

Abstract

Phase evolution and ferroelectric behavior in 0.8BaTiO3-(0.2-x) BiScO3-xPbTiO3 ceramics, x = 0-0.20, has been investigated in this paper. The phase assemblage and lattice parameters indicate the appearance of tetragonal-rhombohedral phase transition and the existence of a MPB region in the composition range x = 0.15-0.20. All these compositions exhibit relaxor ferroelectric behavior due to cation disorder for the substitution on the A-site by Bi and on the B-site by Sc. The dielectric permittivity of the specimens as well as the polarization decreases with increasing BiScO3. However, close to MPB region, the composition with dominance of rhombohedral phase (x = 0.15) exhibits higher remnant polarization than that with tetragonal for the more reorientational directions of the rhombohedral phase than that of the tetragonal one (x = 0.17).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology

Department of material science, Wuhan University of Technology

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 1) M. Matsuura, K. Hirota, P. M. Gehring, Z. G. Ye, W. Chen and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. B, 74, 144107 (2006).
2. 2) E. L. Venturini, R. K. Grubbs, G. A. Samara, Y. Bing and Z. G. Ye, Phys. Rev. B, 74, 064108 (2006).
3. 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00017-410.1016/S0167-2738(98)00017-4 ↗
4. 4) R. M. Glaister, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 43, 348-353 (1960).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1960.tb13669.x ↗
5. 5) M. M. Kumar, M. B. Suresh and S. V. Suryanarayana, J. App. Phys., 86, 1634-1367 (1999).10.1063/1.370939 ↗
6. 6) M. M. Kumar, M. B. Suresh, S. V. Suryanarayana, G. S. Kumar and T. Bhimasankaram, J. App. Phys., 84, 6811-6814 (1998).10.1063/1.368875 ↗
7. 7) D. S. Tinberg and S. Trolier-McKinstry, J. Appl. Phys., 101, 024112 (2007).10.1063/1.2430627 ↗
8. 8) V. A. Isupov, Sov. Phys. Sol. State, 5, 136 (1963).
9. 10.1063/1.150735210.1063/1.1507352 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ssc.2004.04.01610.1016/j.ssc.2004.04.016 ↗
11. 10.1143/JJAP.40.599910.1143/JJAP.40.5999 ↗
12. WEN HAI · 2006 · 89 · 234510.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01031.x ↗
13. 13) C. J. Stringer, T. R. Shrout, C. A. Randal and I. M. Reaney, J. Appl. Phys., 99, 024106 (2006).10.1063/1.2163986 ↗
14. 10.1039/a605546j10.1039/a605546j ↗
15. 10.1080/0731517820820187510.1080/07315178208201875 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-005-5915-710.1007/s10853-005-5915-7 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.252710.1103/PhysRevB.28.2527 ↗