journal article·2026-09-01Open access

Coordination flexibility as key factor for variability of local structure in amorphous Zn–Sn–O and Cu–Sn–O thin films

Corvin Krohn, Arne Jörns, Sofie Vogt, Konrad Ritter, Sandra Montag, Sergiu Levcenko, Marius Grundmann, Holger von Wenckstern, Claudia S Schnohr

Journal of Physics: Materials· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Earth-abundant amorphous oxide semiconductors like Zn–Sn–O and Cu–Sn–O feature electrical conductivities that can be tuned over several orders of magnitude by adjusting the metal composition and oxygen content. This study investigates the element-specific local structure and amorphous nature of Zn–Sn–O and Cu–Sn–O thin films with varying Zn/Sn and Cu/Sn ratios, grown at different oxygen partial pressures by room temperature pulsed laser deposition. X-ray absorption spectroscopy was performed at the Zn, Cu and Sn K -edges, providing local coordination and structural parameters for each metal species by in-depth analysis of near edge and extended fine structures. Except for very high copper contents, all thin films are fully amorphous with no noticeable order beyond the first coordination shell. Zinc atoms keep a tetrahedral configuration with an average bond length slightly larger than that of crystalline ZnO. Tin atoms prefer an octahedral coordination similar to crystalline SnO {}2 but with reduced average coordination number and slightly smaller average bond length. Copper atoms feature a CuO-like coordination with reduced average coordination number and bond length for high copper contents, while further reduction of these structural parameters for low copper contents indicates a broad distribution of local environments. The variability of the Zn–O, Sn–O and Cu–O local building blocks is thus determined by the coordination flexibility of the respective metal, being small for zinc with only one stable oxide but large for tin and copper with two stable oxides at ambient conditions. The dominant effect of the metal composition on the electrical properties of the material is given by the changing fraction of Zn–O, Cu–O and Sn–O building blocks. Undercoordinated tin atoms provide negative charge carriers, leading to increasing n-type conductivity with increasing tin content. In contrast, CuO-like environments promote p-type conductivity for Cu–Sn–O thin films with high enough copper contents.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Leipzig University

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · DESY (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron), Hamburg, Germany

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Bao · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2025 · 3510.1002/adfm.202503755 ↗
2. Vogt · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 11310.1063/1.5038941 ↗
3. Lahr · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2019 · 66 · 337610.1109/TED.2019.2922696 ↗
4. Lahr · APL Mater. · 2020 · 810.1063/5.0022975 ↗
5. Lahr · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 510.1002/aelm.201900548 ↗
6. Silva · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2023 · 910.1002/aelm.202300286 ↗
7. Bitter · ACS Comb. Sci. · 2016 · 18 · 18810.1021/acscombsci.5b00179 ↗
8. Welk · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2022 · 1710.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.024007 ↗
9. Jörns · Adv. Phys. Res. · 2024 · 310.1002/apxr.202300140 ↗
10. Schlupp · MRS Proc. · 2014 · 1633 · 10110.1557/opl.2014.117 ↗
11. Kim · J. Soc. Inf. Display · 2020 · 28 · 59110.1002/jsid.886 ↗
12. Cheng · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2020 · 67 · 233610.1109/TED.2020.2986489 ↗
13. Mukhopadhyaya · IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2021 · 101210.1088/1757-899X/1012/1/012055 ↗
14. Isherwood · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 11810.1063/1.4929752 ↗
15. Cho · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 9810.1063/1.3596701 ↗
16. Zhu · App. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10310.1063/1.4815984 ↗
17. Zhu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 11510.1063/1.4861378 ↗
18. Siah · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 10410.1063/1.4884115 ↗
19. Lee · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 206 · 10310.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.004 ↗
20. Trejo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2023 · 127 · 33810.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05656 ↗
21. Callaghan · J. Phys. Chem. · 2024 · C 12810.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04225 ↗
22. Varshney · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2025 · 87710.1016/j.cplett.2025.142285 ↗
23. Hoel · Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. · 2011 · 637 · 88510.1002/zaac.201000430 ↗
24. Proffit · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2012 · 95 · 365710.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05390.x ↗
25. Zollner · Phys. Status Solidi a A · 2023 · 22010.1002/pssa.202200646 ↗
26. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10310.1063/1.4850895 ↗
27. Körner · Thin Solid Films · 2014 · 555 · 8110.1016/j.tsf.2013.05.146 ↗
28. Pandey · J. Non-Crys. Solids · 2017 · 455 · 9810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.10.035 ↗
29. Mora-Fonz · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 9910.1103/PhysRevB.99.014202 ↗
30. Wahila · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 470610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01608 ↗
31. Medvedeva · J. Appl. Phys. · 2025 · 13710.1063/5.0246364 ↗
32. Körner · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8610.1103/PhysRevB.86.165210 ↗
33. Wahila · APL Mater. · 2019 · 710.1063/1.5053683 ↗
34. Husein · Chem. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 644410.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01672 ↗
35. Medvedeva · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 310.1002/aelm.201700082 ↗
36. Grundmann · J. Phys. D · 2016 · 49 · 2510.1088/0022-3727/49/21/213001 ↗
37. Jörns · Phys. Stat. Sol. RRL · 2025 · 1910.1002/pssr.202500021 ↗
38. Welter · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2019 · 205410.1063/1.5084603 ↗
39. Newville · J. Synchrotron Rad. · 2001 · 8 · 32210.1107/S0909049500016964 ↗
40. Ravel · J. Synchrotron Rad. · 2005 · 12 · 53710.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
41. Rehr · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 550310.1039/b926434e ↗
42. Albertsson · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1989 · 45 · 3410.1107/S0108768188010109 ↗
43. Asbrink · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1970 · 26 · 810.1107/S0567740870001838 ↗
44. Meyer · Phys. Status Solidi · 2012 · 249 · 148710.1002/pssb.201248128 ↗
45. Bolzan · Acta Crystallogr. · 1997 · 53 · 37310.1107/S0108768197001468 ↗
46. Haubold · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 774 · 80310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.026 ↗
47. Ghorbani · J. Phys. Energy · 2023 · 510.1088/2515-7655/acd95b ↗
48. Lazar · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2025 · 2310.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.054095 ↗
49. Ridgway · Nucl. Instrum. Methods · 2005 · 238 · 29410.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.066 ↗
50. Araujo · Phys. Rev. · 2008 · 7810.1103/PhysRevB.78.094112 ↗
51. Schnohr · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7710.1103/PhysRevB.77.073204 ↗
52. Schnohr · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 7910.1103/PhysRevB.79.195203 ↗
53. Reuter · Crystals · 2023 · 13 · 128110.3390/cryst13081281 ↗