Effect of Electric Field on Carbon Encapsulation and Catalytic Activity of Pd for Efficient Formic Acid Decomposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Utilizing carbon coated ferroelectric materials to introduce polarization‐induced electric field (PIEF) stimulates research of electric field‐assisted catalysts for various reactions. However, effect of PIEF on carbon coating mechanism has not been studied. Herein, tourmaline nanoparticles (TNPs) with spontaneous dipole moments were applied as the PIEF supplier and sucrose was utilized as the carbon precursor to synthesize carbon coated TNPs (TNP@SC) to uncover the influence of PIEF on the carbon coating and catalytic activity of Pd toward formic acid decomposition (FAD). PIEF enhanced the adsorption capacity of TNPs for the caramelized intermediate species and increased H+ concentration by facilitating water ionization. Polymerization of adsorbed caramelized intermediate species on TNPs was accelerated. Uniformly coated carbon layer with more defects, larger specific surface area, and higher porosity was coated on TNP. Such surface properties of the carbon layer were beneficial for strongly anchoring ultrafine Pd nanoparticles. Owing to the specific properties of carbon layer and existence of PIEF, Pd/TNP@SC exhibited higher FAD activity than the catalysts absent of PIEF. Stronger PIEF leaded to higher initial turnover frequency. This study provides guidance to supply electric field for catalysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Ionic liquids properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Engineering and Industrial Catalysis School of Chemical Engineering East China University of Science and Technology Shanghai 200237 China
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces Department of Chemistry College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Xiamen University Xiamen 361005 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12564010.1016/j.cej.2020.125640 ↗
2. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0158710.1021/acscatal.7b01587 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467–024–44700-w10.1038/s41467–024–44700-w ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467–024–47568-y10.1038/s41467–024–47568-y ↗
5. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11585410.1016/j.molliq.2021.115854 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1551–2916.2008.02487.x10.1111/j.1551–2916.2008.02487.x ↗
7. Li M. · Fresen. Environ. Bull. · 2022 · 31 · 9369
8. 10.1166/jnn.2010.207210.1166/jnn.2010.2072 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12497110.1016/j.seppur.2023.124971 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.08110.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.081 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17436210.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174362 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12870610.1016/j.matlet.2020.128706 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.10.04810.1016/j.jiec.2023.10.048 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1872–2067(07)60020–510.1016/S1872–2067(07)60020–5 ↗
15. 10.1166/jnn.2010.207010.1166/jnn.2010.2070 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12131310.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121313 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11789310.1016/j.seppur.2020.117893 ↗
18. 10.1088/2053–1591/ab4d2210.1088/2053–1591/ab4d22 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cattod.2024.11482810.1016/j.cattod.2024.114828 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.28910.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.289 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.14810.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.148 ↗
22. 10.1021/ACSCATAL.8B0441410.1021/ACSCATAL.8B04414 ↗
23. 10.1039/D1NR05777D10.1039/D1NR05777D ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0184110.1021/acsanm.8b01841 ↗
25. 10.3390/ijms1109322610.3390/ijms11093226 ↗
26. 10.1515/ntrev-2017–016010.1515/ntrev-2017–0160 ↗
27. 10.1002/asia.20190131810.1002/asia.201901318 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.40910.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.409 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.04010.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.040 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12282410.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122824 ↗
31. 10.1039/D3TC01871G10.1039/D3TC01871G ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.9b0977910.1021/acsami.9b09779 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.04210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.042 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13529010.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135290 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.08710.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.087 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cap.2007.04.03810.1016/j.cap.2007.04.038 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20060050110.1002/adfm.200600501 ↗
38. 10.1039/C7CY02272G10.1039/C7CY02272G ↗
39. 10.1166/jnn.2010.208710.1166/jnn.2010.2087 ↗
40. 10.1111/j.1551–2916.2008.02487.x10.1111/j.1551–2916.2008.02487.x ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13702310.1016/j.electacta.2020.137023 ↗
42. 10.21883/pss.2022.05.54012.27310.21883/pss.2022.05.54012.273 ↗
43. R. Xu Y. J. Feng X. Y. Wei Z. Xu Acta Phys. Sin.2020 69 127710–1–127710–9 https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.69.20200209.10.7498/aps.69.20200209 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2012.04.01010.1016/j.vibspec.2012.04.010 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12613–014–0872–210.1007/s12613–014–0872–2 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0319710.1021/acsaem.0c03197 ↗
47. 10.1002/celc.20180145210.1002/celc.201801452 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.02.02610.1016/j.cclet.2022.02.026 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14719410.1016/j.cej.2023.147194 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15170310.1016/j.cej.2024.151703 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10853–006–0312–410.1007/s10853–006–0312–4 ↗