Synthesis of Host‐Guest Hematite Photoelectrodes for Solar Water Splitting
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hematite (α‐Fe2O3) is a promising semiconductor for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting, due to its abundance, low‐cost and excellent stability. However, the efficiency of α‐Fe2O3 photoelectrodes has been limited by its low hole mobility and fast electron‐hole recombination. Host‐guest architectures have emerged as a suitable design, which involves the use of a nanostructured collector for high solar absorption while maintaining an ultrathin absorber layer for better charge transport. In this study, a thin mesoporous SiO2 host template coated with a conductive thin layer of TiO2 was optimized to support the α‐Fe2O3 film. The α‐Fe2O3 thin layer was deposited by spray pyrolysis and then coated with a FeNiOOH co‐catalyst. A photocurrent improvement of ca. 85% over planar α‐Fe2O3 thin film reference was registered demonstrating the potential of this host‐guest approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Mine drainage and remediation techniques · Arsenic contamination and mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LEPABE – Faculdade de Engenharia Universidade do Porto Rua Dr. Roberto Frias 4200-465 Porto Portugal
IFIMUP and IN-Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Departamento de Física e Astronomia Universidade do Porto Rua do Campo Alegre 687 4169-007 Porto Portugal
Funding
Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras · FCT
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. N. S. Lewis Crabtree G Office of Basic Energy Science Washington DC 2005.
2. R. van de Krol M. Grätzel Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production 2012.10.1007/978-1-4614-1380-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.09810.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.098 ↗
4. F. L. Formal École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne2011.
5. 10.1021/ja210755h10.1021/ja210755h ↗
6. Sivula K. · 2011
7. 10.1039/c3cy00310h10.1039/c3cy00310h ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.04910.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.049 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja412058x10.1021/ja412058x ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20170750210.1002/adma.201707502 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5NH00098J10.1039/C5NH00098J ↗
12. 10.1039/C8CS00868J10.1039/C8CS00868J ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.05110.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.051 ↗
14. Liu Q. · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 3
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0489210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04892 ↗
16. 10.3390/catal711035010.3390/catal7110350 ↗
17. 10.1002/admi.20150062610.1002/admi.201500626 ↗
18. 10.1021/cm900565a10.1021/cm900565a ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0369410.1021/acsnano.5b03694 ↗
20. 10.1039/C4EE01581A10.1039/C4EE01581A ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.05610.1016/j.solener.2017.10.056 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.008 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20090206010.1002/adfm.200902060 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b0772310.1021/acsami.6b07723 ↗
25. 10.1038/srep0268110.1038/srep02681 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0438610.1021/acscatal.7b04386 ↗
27. Haschke S. · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 6
28. 10.1039/c0cp02408b10.1039/c0cp02408b ↗
29. 10.1039/C5EE03871E10.1039/C5EE03871E ↗
30. 10.1039/C1EE02567H10.1039/C1EE02567H ↗
31. 10.1039/C4EE02869D10.1039/C4EE02869D ↗
32. 10.1021/jz301090910.1021/jz3010909 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8SC03297A10.1039/C8SC03297A ↗
34. 10.1002/pip.76810.1002/pip.768 ↗