Quasiparticle energies and optical response of RbTiOPO4 and KTiOAsO4
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Many-body perturbation theory based on density-functional theory calculations is used to determine the quasiparticle band structures and the dielectric functions of the isomorphic ferroelectrics rubidium titanyl phosphate (RbTiOPO4) and potassium titanyl arsenide (KTiOAsO4). Self-energy corrections of more than 2 eV are found to widen the transport band gaps of both materials considerably to 5.3 and 5.2 eV, respectively. At the same time, both materials are characterized by strong exciton binding energies of 1.4 and 1.5 eV, respectively. The solution of the Bethe–Salpeter equation based on the quasiparticle energies results in onsets of the optical absorption within the range of the measured data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Crystal Structures and Properties · Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Bierlein · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 50 · 121610.1063/1.97913 ↗
2. Cheng · Ferroelectrics · 1993 · 142 · 20910.1080/00150199308237899 ↗
3. Hagerman · Chem. Mater. · 1995 · 7 · 60210.1021/cm00052a004 ↗
4. Rosenman · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 365010.1063/1.122851 ↗
5. Roth · 2010 · pp 691
6. Roelofs · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 76 · 499910.1063/1.357211 ↗
7. Risk · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 69 · 415710.1063/1.116970 ↗
8. Jiang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 8810.1063/1.2162665 ↗
9. Atuchin · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2012 · 2410.1088/0953-8984/24/40/405503 ↗
10. Ghoohestani · J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 12310.1063/1.5000242 ↗
11. Khyzhun · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 477 · 76810.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.144 ↗
12. Lowther · Phys. Status Solidi b · 2005 · 242 · 139210.1002/pssb.200440014 ↗
13. Reshak · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 11410.1021/jp1072878 ↗
14. Neufeld · J. Phys. Mater. · 2019 · 210.1088/2515-7639/ab29ba ↗
15. Ghoohestani · J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 12810.1063/5.0022362 ↗
16. Atuchin · Proc. SPIE · 2013 · 877210.1117/12.2017597 ↗
17. Hansson · Appl. Opt. · 2000 · 39 · 505810.1364/AO.39.005058 ↗
18. Dudelzak · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 211010.1063/1.372147 ↗
19. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 5410.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
20. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 10010.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
21. Zhang · New J. Phys. · 2018 · 2010.1088/1367-2630/aac7f0 ↗
22. Bocchini · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2020 · 410.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.124402 ↗
23. Bocchini · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2019 · 3110.1088/1361-648X/ab295c ↗
24. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
25. Del Sole · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 4810.1103/PhysRevB.48.11789 ↗
26. Schmidt · Phys. Status Solidi b · 2005 · 242 · 275110.1002/pssb.200541112 ↗
27. Shishkin · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 7410.1103/PhysRevB.74.035101 ↗
28. Albrecht · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 451010.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4510 ↗
29. Rohlfing · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 231210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2312 ↗
30. Schmidt · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 6710.1103/PhysRevB.67.085307 ↗
31. Thomas · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1992 · 48 · 40110.1107/S0108768192002465 ↗
32. Bokdam · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 610.1038/srep28618 ↗
33. Mangin · Phys. Status Solidi a · 1990 · 120 · K11110.1002/pssa.2211200151 ↗