journal article·2025-07Open access

Impact of Organic Precursors on the Optoelectronic Properties of As‐Synthesized Carbon Dots

Ashwini Nawade, Kumar Babu Busi, Kunchanapalli Ramya, Sabyasachi Chakrabortty, Sabyasachi Mukhopadhyay

ChemNanoMat· Volume 11· Issue 7

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDs), versatile carbon‐based luminescent nanomaterials, offer environmental friendliness, cost‐effectiveness, and tunable optical properties for diverse optoelectronic applications, including light‐emitting diodes, photodetectors, and flexible electronics. These nanoscale materials exhibit unique optical behaviors like highly tunable photoluminescence and efficient multiphoton up‐conversion. Herein, it explores how precursor selection influences CDs’ sp2/sp3 hybridization ratios and their optoelectronic properties. CDs are synthesized from four distinct sources: polymeric polyvinylpyrrolidone, protein, biomass, and citric acid. Biomass‐ and protein‐derived CDs display remarkable photocurrent enhancements under blue light, attributed to balanced sp2/sp3 ratios, while polymer‐derived CDs show limited optoelectronic response. These findings reveal the critical role of precursor composition in tailoring the structural and electronic properties of CDs, offering sustainable pathways for their application in advanced optoelectronic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics SRM University‐AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh Neerukonda Village Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522240 India

Department of Chemistry SRM University‐AP, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh Neerukonda Village Guntur Andhra Pradesh 522240 India

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4NR05712K10.1039/C4NR05712K ↗
2. 10.1039/D4TC01396D10.1039/D4TC01396D ↗
3. 10.3390/nano1102036410.3390/nano11020364 ↗
4. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0130610.1021/acscentsci.0c01306 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.00410.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.004 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0540610.1021/acsnano.5b05406 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.5b0044810.1021/acsami.5b00448 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-023-08797-610.1007/s10853-023-08797-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10092410.1016/j.apmt.2020.100924 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.08.00610.1016/j.nantod.2016.08.006 ↗
11. 10.3390/nano1106144810.3390/nano11061448 ↗
12. 10.1039/c2jm34690g10.1039/c2jm34690g ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b1781010.1021/acsami.7b17810 ↗
14. 10.1021/ja066907010.1021/ja0669070 ↗
15. 10.1039/b906252a10.1039/b906252a ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20130111410.1002/anie.201301114 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20070127110.1002/anie.200701271 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20120149910.1002/adfm.201201499 ↗
19. 10.1002/advs.20180036910.1002/advs.201800369 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20120259910.1002/adma.201202599 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl400368v10.1021/nl400368v ↗
22. 10.1039/D4NR01569J10.1039/D4NR01569J ↗
23. 10.1038/s41551-020-0540-y10.1038/s41551-020-0540-y ↗
24. 10.1002/anie.20090662310.1002/anie.200906623 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsabm.4c0000410.1021/acsabm.4c00004 ↗
26. 10.1002/eem2.1203810.1002/eem2.12038 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.05410.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.13314310.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133143 ↗
29. 10.3390/chemosensors302007010.3390/chemosensors3020070 ↗
30. 10.1007/s12274-014-0644-310.1007/s12274-014-0644-3 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6CP01269H10.1039/C6CP01269H ↗
32. 10.1002/jccs.20010009610.1002/jccs.200100096 ↗
33. C. H.Moore S.GiriJ. T.McLeskeyJr. P.Jena inProc. SPIE 10174 Int. Symp. on Clusters and Nanomaterials Richmond VA December2016 p.101740J https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2235800.10.1117/12.2235800 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0805410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08054 ↗